Arsenic-safe drinking water and antioxidants for the management of arsenicosis patients
Abstract
The role of arsenic-safe drinking water and antioxidants in the management of arsenicosis patients were observed. Two hundred and fifty patients of arsenicosis from an arsenic-affected area of Bangladesh were included and divided into five groups based on the source of drinking water (green- or red-marked tube well) and intake of antioxidants (vitamin A, C and E). Melanosis improved in 43 patients of the group who took arsenic-safe drinking water from green-marked tube well and antioxidants regularly. Patients of the group who took green-marked tube well water regularly but not the antioxidant showed improvement in melanosis in 22 cases. The respondents who were using red-marked tube well water and antioxidants, only two of them improved; and all other respondents either deteriorated or did not improve. The respondents who were using red-marked tube well water but not the antioxidant, none did show any improvement of their illness. The respondents who took antioxidants irregularly and had irregular intake of safe water, were not considered to compare the prognosis of skin lesions. Regarding keratosis, the respondents who took green-marked tube well water regularly and antioxidant regularly, 8 of them improved, 1 case didn’t change; while the respondents who took green-marked tube well water regularly but not the antioxidant, 8 cases didn’t improve much but majority of them remain unchanged. Among the respondents of other groups, keratosis deteriorated. This study suggests that both arsenic-safe drinking water and use of antioxidants gave good result in improvement of the arsenicosis.
Key words: antioxidant, arsenic, arsenicosis, drinking water
DOI: 10.3329/bjp.v1i2.487
Bangladesh J Pharmacol 2006; 1: 42-50
Keywords
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
IndexCopernicus 2009 value: 9.00; 2010 value: 9.00
SJR h-index 2009 value: 3.00; 2010 value: 4.00
Downloaded by more than 5,000 readers: Saha MR, Alam MA, Akter R, Jahangir R. In vitro free radical scavenging activity of Ixora coccinea L. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 2008; 3: 90-96.
On average 907 downloads per research article (pdf); 1329 registered user (22 April 2012).
On average 846 downloads per research article (pdf); 1225 registered user (22 December 2011).
On average 814 downloads per research article (pdf); 1117 registered user (22 August 2011).
Abstracted/indexed in (19): Academic Search Complete, Agroforestry Abstracts, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Asia Journals Online, Bangladesh Journals Online, Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Current Abstracts, Directory of Open Access Journals, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Forest Products Abstracts, Google Scholar, HINARI (WHO), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Open J-gate, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS and Social Sciences Citation Index.
For longterm preservation, the journal has been archived in the e-Depot archive.
Journal impact analysis 4-years (Harzing's Publish or Perish):
Citation/year: 81.80; Citation/paper: 3.12; h-index: 10.0 (March 20, 2012)
Citation/year: 54.25; Citation/paper: 2.13; h-index: 8.0 (September 8, 2011)
Citation/year: 42.25; Citation/paper: 1.67; h-index: 7.0 (May 29, 2011)
Citation/year: 34.25; Citation/paper: 1.36; h-index: 6.0 (March 13, 2011)
Citation/year: 31.67; Citation/paper: 1.02; h-index: 5.0 (September 2, 2010)
Available in institutional webpage (20): Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University; Eastern Michigan University Library;Halmstad University, Sweden; John Hopkins University; National Taiwan University; Oxford University; San Jose State University; Tel Aviv University; Tokyo University of Agriculture; University of Hong Kong; University of Maine; University of Nevada; University of North Carolina; University of Oklahama; University of Saskatchewan; University of Toronto; University of Washington; University of Windsor; Vrije Universiteit Brussel; York University
The Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology does not accept responsibility for views expressed in articles, mini-reviews, and other contributions that appear in its pages.