Spot Urine Sodium to Potassium Ratio as a Tool to Assess Severity and Mortality among Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis having Ascites

Authors

  • Safikul Islam Medical Officer, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Sheikh Russel National Gastroliver Institute & Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mohammad Golam Azam Associate Professor and Unit Head, Department of GHPD, BIRDEM
  • Md Abu Sayeed Mustafa Medical Officer, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Sheikh Russel National Gastroliver Institute & Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Sarker Mohammed Sajjad Assistant Professor, Department of GHPD, BIRDEM
  • Indrajit Kumar Datta Associate Professor, Department of GHPD, BIRDEM
  • A H M Rowshon Professor & Honorary Senior Consultant, Department of GHPD, BIRDEM
  • Arif Mahmud Registrar, Department of GHPD, BIRDEM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bccj.v12i2.76456

Keywords:

Ascites, Decompensated Cirrhosis

Abstract

Background: Decompensated cirrhosis of liver is considered as a systemic disease affecting the functions of several other organs. Renal function is an independent prognostic factor for patients with decompensated cirrhosis, but assessing renal function through glomerular filtration rate are not convenient, especially for routine use. Previous study found that spot urinary sodium to potassium ratio (UNa/K) was associated with renal dysfunction which influences the severity and outcome in decompensated cirrhosis of liver patients having ascites.

Aims and objectives: The present study was aimed to determine the relation of the ratio of sodium to potassium in randomly collected urine samples with severity of disease and mortality in decompensated cirrhosis having ascites.

Materials and Methods: This longitudinal study was conducted at the Department of Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disorders, BIRDEM General Hospital, Shahbagh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from July, 2019 to August, 202l. A total of 150 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of decompensated cirrhosis with ascites were enrolled in this study. A detailed history and thorough clinical examination were carried out in each patient, along with relevant investigations. Data collection was done through a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the statistical software SPSS 23.

Results: Age of the patients was 59.0±12.91 (mean±SD) years, male predominance was observed (52%). The UNa/K ratio was 4.24±3.25 (mean±SD) with a range of 0.42 to 18.46. Diagnostic accuracy of UNa/K ratio in the detection of severity and mortality was estimated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The AUC of UNa/K ratio was 0.608 and 0.640 for severity and mortality respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV at cut-off  2.55 were 50.0, 66.0, 42.4 and 72.5; at 2.65 were 54.0, 66.0, 44.3, and 74.2; at 2.87 were 58.0, 62.0, 43.3, and 74.7; at 3.21 were 58.0, 58.0, 40.8, and 73.4 respectively for severity score (MELD). Patients with UNa+/K+ less than 2.87 or equal, had a significantly higher MELD score category (p= 0.02).  At 3 months follow-up, 24.7% mortality was observed. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV at cut-off 1.62 were 51.4, 85.8, 54.3 and 84.3; at 1.79 were 54.1, 79.7, 46.5 and 84.1; at 1.83 were 59.5, 77.0, 45.8 and 85.3; at 2.87 were 58.0, 62.0, 43.3, and 74.7 respectively for mortality. The UNa/K ratio was statistically low among the patients who didn’t survive (p<.05).

Conclusion: This study revealed that decreased ratio of spot urinary sodium to potassium was associated with the severity and mortality among decompensated cirrhosis of liver patients with ascites.

Bangladesh Crit Care J September 2024; 12 (2): 118-124

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
38
PDF
20

Downloads

Published

2024-10-16

How to Cite

Islam, S., Azam, M. G., Mustafa, M. A. S., Sajjad, S. M., Indrajit Kumar Datta, Rowshon, A. H. M., & Mahmud, A. (2024). Spot Urine Sodium to Potassium Ratio as a Tool to Assess Severity and Mortality among Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis having Ascites. Bangladesh Critical Care Journal, 12(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.3329/bccj.v12i2.76456

Issue

Section

Original Articles