Quantification of Pre-Analytical Quality Indicator in a Clinical Laboratory

Authors

  • Saritha Kamath U Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Sushma Belurkar Department of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Reshma GS Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Shifani Edline D’Souza Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
  • Asha Patil Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v20i3.52793

Keywords:

Pre-analytical errors; Quality indicator; Turnaround time

Abstract

Introduction: Quality in laboratory medicine have a significant role in ensuring the adequate and complete total testing process. Clinical laboratory and testing process is an integral part of modern medicine as it has a direct effect on the patient. As per the requirement of certification or accreditation bodies, different laboratories use different ways of developing quality indicators (QI), which helps to monitor, progress and maintain the quality of the laboratory services.

Materials and Methods: A cross sectional retrospective study carried out in the Hematology Laboratory of a tertiary care hospital. Data of pre-analytical quality indicators was collected for months from August 2015 to January 2016. Pre-analytical quality indicators analysed for sample collections were clotted sample, hemolyzed sample, incompletely filled form, wrong labelled sample, insufficient sample volume and patient waiting for sample collection after registration in the laboratory- turnaround time (TAT). Turn around time for patient waiting for sample collection is 15 minutes from the registration of the request form.

Results: The overall sample received during the six months was 2,03,337 among these pre-analytical errors found in 1067. The highest rate indicators were clotted sample 589 (0.28%), followed by insufficient sample volume 376(0.18), incompletely filled form and wrongly labelled sample 67(0.03%), Hemolyzed sample 35(0.017%). 94.49 % of the patient waiting time for the sample collection from registration was within the Turnaround time (TAT).

Conclusion: The development of a quality indicator for clinical laboratory medicine helps to improve quality in processing and testing of samples. Quality indicator plays a vital role in continuous improvement activities of clinical practice, which are aiming to deliver quality result and reducing the errors.

Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.20(3) 2021 p.525-529

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
910
PDF
562

Downloads

Published

2021-04-04

How to Cite

U, S. K., Belurkar, S., GS, R., D’Souza, S. E., & Patil, A. (2021). Quantification of Pre-Analytical Quality Indicator in a Clinical Laboratory. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 20(3), 525–529. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v20i3.52793

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish in the Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science agree to the following terms that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science the right of first publication of the work.

  2. Creative Commons Licence
    Articles in Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0.This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.