Randomized Controlled Study of Ultrasonic Scalpel Tonsillectomy Versus Cold Dissection Tonsillectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v23i4.76529Keywords:
cold dissection; operative time; post-operative pain; tonsillectomy; ultrasonic scalpel.Abstract
Background The purpose of this study is to compare two different techniques of tonsillectomy, the ultrasonic scalpel, and the cold dissection tonsillectomy. In this study, the duration of the surgery, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative pain and post-operative hemorrhage rate will be compared. Material and Methods This is a randomized controlled study involving 72 patients within the age of 3-40 years old with history of recurrent tonsillitis or tonsillar hypertrophy with obstructive symptoms. The patients are randomized to have both tonsils removed either by cold dissection method or ultrasonic scalpel method. During the surgery, operative time and intra-operative blood loss will be documented. The post-operative pain score was documented by the patient using the visual analog pain score. Post-operative hemorrhage will also be documented if present. Results The data collected will be analysed statistically. The duration of surgery for ultrasonic scalpel tonsillectomy was significantly shorter (mean 14.11 minutes versus 29.09 minutes, p <0.001) and intra-operative bleeding was also significantly lower (mean 9.58 ml versus 87.57 ml, p <0.001). There were no significant mean differences of post-operative pain score between cold dissection and ultrasonic scalpel in first 6 hours up to day 6 of post-surgery. However, post-operative pain score for cold dissection tonsillectomy was significantly less on the 7th day of post-surgery. Conclusions There was no documented post-operative hemorrhage. Ultrasonic scalpel tonsillectomy is more superior compared to cold dissection tonsillectomy in terms of operative time and intra-operative blood loss, however there is no difference in the post-operative pain score.
Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol. 23 No. 04 October’24 Page : 1142-1148
Downloads
148
242
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rajinder Singh Hardyal Singh, Ramiza Ramza Ramli, Irfan Mohamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science agree to the following terms that:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science the right of first publication of the work.
Articles in Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0.This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.