A Study of Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: Transphenoidal Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

Authors

  • Haradhan Deb Nath Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka
  • Kanak Kanti Barua Professor and Chiarman, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka
  • Kazi Hafiz Uddin Resident, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka
  • Monirul Islam Resident, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka
  • Omar Faruque Resident, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka
  • Atiqur Rahman Resident, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka
  • Shahnewaz Bari Resident, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka
  • Rahul Quddus Resident, Department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372

Keywords:

Pituitary adenoma, transphenoidal approach, endoscopic endonasal approach, microscopic approach, acromegally, cushing’s syndrome.

Abstract

Background: Transphenoidal endoscopic approach is minimal invasive surgery in case of pituitary adenoma.

Objective : To see the outcome of transphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic approach in case of pituitary tumor.

Results : This study showed among the 37 patients, 25 (67.6%) were done by transphenoidal microscopic approach and 12 (32.4%) patients were done by endonasal endoscopic approach. Among the 12 patients 8(66.7%) were male and 4(33.3%) were female. Among the 25, patients 15(60%) were male and 10(40%) were female. It was documented that in 12 patients, 10(83.3%) were macroadenoma and 2(16.7%) were microadenoma. It was evident that among the 25 patient 18(72%) were macroadenoma and 7(28%) were microadenoma. Among 12 patients, 11 (91.7%) had preoperative visual disturbance and 1(8.3%) had normal vision. It was observed that among 25 patients, 23(92%) patients had preoperative visual disturbance and 2 (8%) patients had normal vision. Tumor was totally removed in 9(75%) patients in endoscopic approach and 14(56%) in microscopic approach. Clinically 10(83.3%) patients were improved in endoscopically and 16(64%) patients were improved in microscopic group.

Conclusion: It was concluded that endoscopic endonasal approach is better than transphenoidal microscopic approach.

Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (1): 21-29

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
22
PDF
44

Downloads

Published

2015-01-31

How to Cite

Nath, H. D. ., Barua, K. K., Uddin, K. H. ., Islam, M. ., Faruque, O., Rahman, A. ., Bari, S., & Quddus, R. . (2015). A Study of Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: Transphenoidal Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach. Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience, 31(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372

Issue

Section

Original Articles