Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 2014; 9: 129-139. DOI:10.3329/bjp.v9i1.15622 |
| Research | Article | |
Endophytic Natural Product Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Shridevi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Tumkur 572 106, Karnataka, India.
All parts of Tabebuia argentia were used for isolation and identified the lapachol producing endophytes were used for evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity (antimitotic, antiproliferative, determination of cell viability, DNA fragmentation). Five endophytes (leaf endophytes, Alternaria alternata, Alternaria sp., Aspegerillus niger, Penicillium sp. and the bark endophyte, A. alternata) are able to produce potent anticancer agent lapachol. The 3rd and 4th fractions of endophytic extracts (A. niger and Penicillium sp.) exhibited the pure lapachol. The 3rd fraction of A. niger lapachol strongly inhibited the Allium cepa root actively growing cells at various stages of cell cycle in antimitotic assay and the index was 22.5 mg/mL, the yeast cells were died due to toxicity and possessed the cell necrosis and they exhibited the DNA fragmentation. Present promised endophytes can be used for production of lapachol using endophyte A. niger for large scale production of lapachol within short period of time.
Natural products are naturally derived metabolites and/or byproducts from microorganisms, plants, or animals (Baker et al., 2000). Endophytes, microorganisms that reside in the tissues of living plants, are relatively unstudied and potential sources of novel natural products for exploitation in medicine, agriculture, and industry. It is noteworthy that, of the nearly 300,000 plant species that exist on the earth, each individual plant is host to one or more endophytes. Only a few these plants have ever been completely studied relative to their endophytic biology (Strobel and Daisy, 2003). Novel antibiotics, antimycotics, immunosuppressants, and anticancer compounds are only a few examples of what has been found after the isolation, culture, purification, and characterization of some choice endophytes in the recent past. The potential prospects of finding new drugs that may be effective candidates for treating newly developing diseases in humans, plants, and animals are great (Strobel and Daisy, 2003). Many endophytes are producing antibiotics, antiviral compounds, anticancer agents, antioxidant molecules, insecticidal compounds, antidiabetic compounds, immunosuppressive compounds etc.
Tabebuia argentea (Bignoniaceae) is a large and yellow flowering tree (Figure 1) and have proven to be a rich source of many organic compounds, especially, of phenolic and poliophenolic nature. The plant able to produce anti-cancer agent, lapachol it is ability to interfere with the bioactivities of enzymes known as, topoisomerases, a group of enzymes that are critical for DNA replication in cells (Wuerzberger et al., 1998). The antitumor activity of lapachol may be due to its interaction with nucleic acids and the interaction of the naphthoquinone moiety between base pairs of the DNA helix occurs with subsequent inhibition of DNA replication and RNA synthesis (Murray and Pizzorno, 1998). Other biological activities of lapachol are antimetastatic activity (Balassiano et al., 2005), antimicrobial and antifungal activity (Da Silva et al., 2003), antiviral activity (Breger et al., 2007), anti-inflammatory (Almeida et al., 1990), antiparasitic activity (Murray and Pizzorno, 1998), leishmanicidal activity (Teixeira et al., 2001) and molluscicidal activity (Silva et al., 2005). Only one report is avaliable on identification of lapachol producing endophytes of Tabebuia argentea from our lab only (Sadananda et al., 2011). Present investigation was aimed to isolate and identification of lapachol producing different endophytes and evaluation of endophytic lapachol for antimitotic, antiproliferative and DNA fragmentation assays in in vitro. This is the first report of endophytic lapachol and its in vitro antimitotic, antiproliferative and DNA fragmentation assays nationally and internationally.
Plant material collection
T. argentea collected in the month of September 2012 from Shridevi Institute of Engineering and Technology campus, Tumkur, Karnataka, India and it is authenticated by Dr. P. Sharanappa, Department of Studies in Biosciences, University of Mysore, Hemagangothri, Hassan, Karnataka.
Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi
The protocol for isolation follows methods used in other endophyte studies (Theantana et al., 2009) but adjusted for the specific plant tissues used here following pilot experiments. The plant parts were washed in running tap water for one hour. Fifty segments of leaves from each plant were cut into 5 mm 2 pieces, including a vein (25 samples) and intervein (25 samples). 25 segments of branches were then cut randomly to a length of 5 mm. Endophytic fungi were isolated from the different parts of the plant (25 segments). Twenty five segments (5 mm long) were cut from the stems and the roots. The total 150 segments of plant material were treated by triple surface sterilization techniques (Bussaban et al., 2001). Each piece is then placed on malt extract agar (malt extract (20 g/L), rose Bengal (0.033 g/L), chloromphenicol (50 mg/L, agar (15 g/L). All plates were incubated at 26+2°C until mycelium grew out hyphal tips were cut and transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA). Half strength PDA is used for subculture and stock culture. Identification was made based on colony and hyphal morphology of the fungal cultures, characteristics of the spores (Barnett and Hunter, 1972).
Fungal cultivation and extraction of metabolite
The fungal endophytes were cultivated on potato dextrose broth (Himedia) by placing agar blocks of actively growing pure culture (3 mm diameter) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of the medium. The flasks were incubated at 26 ± 2°C for 1 week with periodical shaking at 150 rpm. After the incubation period, the cultures were taken out and filtered through sterile cheesecloth to remove the mycelia mats.
The fungal metabolites from different endophytic mycelial mats were extracted by using methanol. Equal volume of the filtrate and solvents were taken in a separating funnel and shaken vigorously for 10 min. The solution were then allowed to stand, where the cell mass got separated and the solvent so obtained was collected. All solvents were evaporated and the resultant compound was dried in vacuum evaporator using MgSO4 to yield the crude extracts (Raviraja et al., 2006).
Test for lapachol identification
Dried endophytic extract and plant flower extract of T. argentea was extracted with ethyl acetate. 1 g of the endophytic and flower extract was recrystallized in petroleum ether and benzene (80:60) and heated at 139°C to 140°C for 5 min. 2 mL of ferric chloride solution was added and observed for the color change (Thomson, 1987).
Test for anthraquinones (Borntrager test)
2 mL of endophytic test sample (of plant and endophytic extracts) was shaken with 4 mL of hexane. The lyophilic layer was separated and adds 4 mL of dilute ammonia was added and color change was observed.
Thin layer chromatography
A thin mark is made at the bottom of the plate with a pencil to apply the sample spots. Then samples solutions are applied on the spots marked on the line at equal distances.
The mobile phase (chloroform: methanol, 19:1) (Houghton et al., 1994) is poured into the TLC chamber to a level few centimeters above the chamber bottom. Then the plate prepared with sample spotting is placed in TLC chamber such that the side of the plate with sample line is towards the mobile phase. Then the chamber is closed with a lid.
The plate is immersed such that sample spots are well above the level of mobile phase but not immersed in the solvent for development. Allow sufficient time for development of spots. Then the plates were removed and allowed to dry. The sample spots were visualized in UV light chamber for the sample.
Column chromatography
Column chromatography is a type of adsorption chromatography techniques. Here stationary phase is a solid material packed in a vertical column. The column chromatography requires a vertical glass column with a knob at the bottom end. Silica gel used as stationary phase for the column. Hexane used as the mobile phase of chromatography for the separation. Cotton wool has plugged before to hold stationary phase and let allow only the solvent and sample. The stationary phase material (silica) is suitably moistened with mobile phase (hexane) and packed sufficiently in the column with a cotton pad at the bottom. The extract sample to be separated is placed on the top of packed stationary phase. The mobile phase is poured into the column over the sample. A collecting beaker is placed at the bottom of column near the end to collect the elute. Totally 12 endophytes were used, six fractions were collected (for each endophytes) in 10 mL intermetant gap.
Antimitotic activity
Method adopted by Shweta et al (2012) was used for determination of antimitotic activity using Allium cepa root with slight modification. A. cepa were collected from Tumkur vegetable market. A. cepa bulbs were sprouted in water for 24 hours at room temperature. The uniform root tips of A. cepa were selected for the study. These roots were dipped in the extract (10 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL) for 48 hours. Water was used for dilution and lapachol was used as a standard for study. After 48 hours, the root tips were fixed in the fixing solution of acetic acid and alcohol (1:3). Squash preparation was made by staining with acetocarmine stain. Morphology and the number of the cells were observed under microscope (40x). In all 350-400 cells were counted and cells manifesting different stages of mitosis i.e., interphase and prophase (P), metaphase (M), anaphase (A) and telophase (T) were recorded. The mitotic index was calculated using the following formula (Shweta et al., 2012; Subhadradevi et al., 2011).
Antiproliferative activity
Evaluation of antiproliferative activity of plant extract was done by yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae model according to Shwetha et al (2012).
Yeast inoculum preparation
The yeast was inoculated with sterilized potato dextrose broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and it was referred as seeded broth.
Determination of cell viability
Cell viability assay was performed with 2.5 mL of potato dextrose broth and 0.5 mL of yeast inoculums in four separate test tubes. In the first test tube distilled water, in second test tube quercetin (Sigma Aldrich) as standard (1 mg/mL), in third and fourth test tubes plant extract (10 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL respectively) were added. All tubes were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. In the above cell suspension, 0.1%methylene blue dye was added in all tubes and they were observed under low power microscope. The number of viable cells, those does not stain and look transparent with oval shape while dead cells get stained and appeared blue in color were counted in 16 chambers of hemocytometer and the average number of cell was calculated. The percentage of cell viability was calculated using the formula (Sehgal et al., 2006).
DNA fragmentation assay
DNA fragmentation assay was performed by the method of Bicas et al. (2011). Briefly, 0.1 mL of extract mixed with 2.5 mL potato dextrose broth and 0.5 mL of yeast inoculums. Cell suspension was incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. DNA was isolated from the treated cell suspension with Tris EDTA buffer and DNA was electrophoresed (Shwetha et al., 2012).
Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium sp., Penicillium sp., Rhizopus sp., the bark yileded A. anlternata, F. oxysporum and unidentified fungi whereas, A. alternata and Alternaria sp (Table I; Figure 2). Each fungal species were identified based on morphology and conidial structures using different standard fungal manuals. The identified endophytes were mass cultured on potato dextrose agar (Figure 3) and potato dextrose broth.
Endophytes |
Parts used |
||
---|---|---|---|
Bark |
Leaf |
Stem |
|
Alternaria alternata |
+ [10] |
+ [3] |
+ [12] |
Alternaria sp. |
- |
+ [6] |
+ [7] |
Aspergillus niger |
- |
+ [5] |
- |
Fusarium oxysporum |
+ [2] |
+ [1] |
- |
Fusarium sp. |
- |
+ [9] |
- |
Penicillium sp. |
- |
+ [4] |
- |
Rhizopus sp. |
- |
+ [11] |
- |
Unidentified fungi |
+ [8] |
- |
- |
+: present, each experiment was repeated for thrice for each. Parenthesis given numbers are given for identification of endophytes from different parts origin |
Yellow color confirmed the presence of quinoned compounds (Naphthoquinone). The leaf endophytes, A. alternata, Alternaria sp., A. niger, Penicillium sp., the bark endophytes, A. alternata has showed the presence of lapachol compared with standard lapachol and plant parts. Naphthoquinone was identified inleaf endophytes, A. alternata, Alternaria sp., A. niger, Penicillium sp., the bark endophytes, A. alternata and in plant extract. Other endophytes did not show the presence of naphthoquinone presence. The five endophytes have shown the presence of napthoquinone and lapachol (Table II), whereas the Figure 4 showing only positive reports of A. niger and Penicillium sp.
The leaf endophytes, A. alternata, Alternaria sp., A. niger, Penicillium sp., and the bark endophyte, A. alternata has showed confirmed the presence of lapachol. TLC was performed for the extract of endophyte in comparison with standard (Figure 5). The developed bands were observed under UV light. TLC for the endophytic extract was compared with standard lapachol.
Endophytes |
Napthoquinone |
Lapachol |
---|---|---|
Alternaria alternata [10] |
+ |
+ |
Alternaria alternata [3] |
+ |
+ |
Alternaria alternata [12] |
- |
- |
Alternaria sp. [6] |
+ |
+ |
Alternaria sp. [7] |
- |
- |
Aspergillus niger [5] |
+ |
+ |
Fusarium oxysporum [2] |
- |
- |
Fusarium oxysporum [1] |
- |
- |
Fusarium sp. [9] |
- |
- |
Penicillium sp. [4] |
+ |
+ |
Rhizopus sp. [11] |
- |
- |
Unidentified fungi [8] |
- |
- |
Bark |
+ |
+ |
Leaf |
+ |
+ |
Stem |
+ |
+ |
+: present, -: not present, each experiment was repeated for thrice for each |
Column chromatography was performed to partially purify the lapachol from the endophytic extract using silica gel as the stationary phase and the hexane used as the mobile phase solvent. Only two leaf endophytes (A. niger and Penicillium sp.) were used for this experiment. The column fractions of about 20 mL for every 20 min was collected, 6 fractions were collected.
TLC was performed for the collected fractions in comparison with standard lapachol; at fraction 3 and 4 exhibited the clear band of lapachol (Figure 6). The both endophytes exhibited presence of lapachol clearly. Most of the lpachol is yielded at 3 and 4 fractions of endophytic extracts. The 3rd fraction of leaf endophyte, A. niger extract was used for in vitro antimitotic, antiproliferative and DNA fragmentation assay.
The antimitotic assay revealed that the lapachol fraction of A. niger extract showed good inhibition of meristamatic cell in different stages of cell cycle due various process. We have found that A. niger lapachol is induced mitotic activity at various levels of cell cycle viz., shrinked interphase cells, abnormal chromosomal distribution after metaphase, chromosomal bridges with vagrant chromosomes at anaphase, chromosomal stickiness and clumping in telophase, chromosomal bridge and clumping, chromosomal degeneration, large nucleolus, binucleolar and nucleolar burst and mega cell and chromosomal clumping in small cells was observed was compared with normal mitotic phases of interphase, metaphase and anaphase (Figure 7 and Figure 8). The value decrease dose dependently with lapachol from standard lapachol, A. niger and Penicillium sp. lapachol and the mitotic index was found to be 12.2, 22.5, 28.7 mg/mL respectively whereas the untreated control showed 91.6 mg/mL (Figure 9).
The A. niger lapachol (3rd fraction) was evaluated using Saccharomyces cerevisiae in antiproliferative activity and it showed potent inhibition of yeast cell growth. The number of dead cells was calculated using above mentioned formula. The A. niger lapachol inhibited the yeast cell growth above 70% whereas the standard showed more than 80%. This result confirms the purity of the lapachol and also similar activity (Figure 10). The A. niger lapachol leads to death of yeast by showing dead cells with debris (Figure 11). We sequentially observed the yeast cells treatment of A. niger lapachol after 24 hours. This results clearly idicates that how our endophytic lapachol acts on yeast cells. The antiproliferative activity of standard lapachol, endophytes, A. niger and Penicillium sp was noticed at different range was 86.5, 72.8 and 68.2 respectively (Figure 12).
DNA fragmentation assay confirmed the antiproliferative activity of A. niger lapachol. After 48 hours treatment with A. niger and Penicillium sp. lapachol is breakdown the DNA of yeast it is one of the method of inhibition of DNA replication in cancer therapy. The DNA fragmentation is may be due to inhibtion of topoisomerase, are the key enzymes in DNA replication (Figure 13).
Many of the natural anti-cancer agents are exploring by using of endophytes. Taxol is a diterpenoids it can kill tumor cells by enhancing the assembly of microtubules and inhibiting their depolymerisation, which was first extracted from endophyte, Taxomyces andreanae (Stierle et al., 1993), Pestalotiopsis microspora (Li et al., 1996), A. alternata, Periconia sp., Pithomyces sp., Chaetomella raphigera, Monochaetia sp. and Seimatoantlerium nepalense (Visalakchi and Muthumary, 2010). Torreyanic acid, a selectively cytotoxic quinone dimer (anticancer agent), was isolated from a P. microspora strain (Lee et al., 1996). The lapachol ability to interfere with the bioactiviries of enzymes, topoisomerases are group of enzymes are critical for DNA replication in cells (Wuerzberger et al., 1998). Sadananda et al. (2011) have primarily reported the lapachol producing endophytic fungi (A. niger and A. alternata). In curent study, we have identified four endophytic which are capable to produce lapachol. The pure endophytic lapachol was isolated at 3rd and 4th fraction in column chromatography and it was proved in TLC comparision with the standard. The 3rd fraction of A. niger and Penicillium sp. lapachol induced the antimitotic, antiproliferative and DNA fragmentation activity and by this results clearly indicating that it has potential role in cancer management like plant lapachol. The antimitotic activity, the endophytic lapachol arrest the cell growth in cell cycle as reduce the rate of cell division by preventing the entry of cell into the other different stages. This result is confirmation with the reports of others (Shwetha et al., 2012; Bhujbal et al., 2011; Jangala et al., 2012; Ping et al.. 2012; Sehgal et al., 2006).
Nowadays, yeast is using as a model system for anticancer drug discovery in in vitro assays against enzyme inhibition or selective toxicity or in screen using model organism. Use of yeast as model organism for anticancer drug discovery is that of the process affected by cancer related genetic and epigenetic alterations are fundamentals to all living organisms; cell cycle progression, DNA replication and segregation, maintenance of genomic integrety and stress responses are highly conserved among eukaryotes, making yeast an attactive model in which to results in premature death of the living cells. It was observed with endophyte, A. niger lapachol.
In the present investigation of cell antiproliferative activity, most of the cells died and cell debris was observed due to the treatment of endophytic lapachol toxicity. An interesting point, we have observed that yeast cell necrosis sequentially due to lapachol toxicity. Similar results were reported by using cancer cell lines using plant extracts (Türk et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2007). Another set was subjected to DNA fragmentation assay concludes the breakdown of yeast DNA due to the effect of endophytic lapachol.
Thus, it can assume the possible mechanism of 50% concentration of lapachol anticancer activity it induces strong cytotoxicity, antiproliferative, DNA fragmentation activity in tested experiments. Present investigation reports support the therapeutic use of endophytic lapachol as anticancer agent. Isolation, identification of endophytes and its lapachol isolation and cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo experiments are needed to obtain more details on mechanism of action of lapachol.
The authors are grateful to Visvesvaraya Technological Univer-sity, Karnataka, India for providing financial support for this investigation under research grants. We thank Dr. MR Hulinaykar, Sri Shridevi Charitable Trust and Dr. Sukumaran K, Principal, SIET, Tumkur, India for encouragement and Dr. S Lokesh, Applied Botany and Biotechnology, University of Mysore, Mysore, and Dr. Sharanappa P, Department of Studies in Biosciences, University of Mysore, Hemagangothri, Hassan, India for assistance in identifying endophytic fungi.
Almeida ER, Filha AAS, Santos ERD, Lopes CAC. Anti-inflammatory action of lapachol. J Ethnopharmacol. 1990; 29: 239-41.
Baker D, Mocek U, Garr C. Natural products vs. combinatorials: A case study. In: Biodiversity: new leads for pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries. Wrigley SK, Hayes MA, Thomas R, Chrystal EJT, Nicholson N (ed). United Kingdom, The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2000, pp 66-72.
Balassiano II, Paulo SA, Silva NH, Cabral MC, Carvalho MC. Demonstration of lapachol as a potential drug for fighting cancer metastases. Oncol Rep. 2005; 13: 329.
Barnett HL, Hunter BB. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. II ed. Burgess Publishing Company. Minnesota. 1972.
Bicas JL, Neri-Numa IA, Ruiz ALTG, De Carvalho JE, Pastore GM. Evaluation of the antioxidant and antiproliferative potential of bioflavors. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011; 49: 1610-15.
Bhujbal SS, Deshmukh RP, Bidkar JS, Thatte VA, Awasare SS, Garg PP. Evaluation of cytotoxicity activity of barks of Mimosops elengi. EurAsian J BioSci. 2011; 5: 73-79.
Breger J, Fuchs BB, Aperis G, Moy TI, Ausubel FM, Mylonakis E. Antifungal chemical compounds identified using a C. elegans pathogenicity assay. Plos Pathog. 2007; 3: 168-78.
Bussaban B, Lumyong S, Lumyong P, McKenzie EH, Hyde KD. Endophytic fungi from Amomum siamense. Canadian J Microbiol. 2001; 47: 943-48.
Da Silva MN, Da Souza MCBV, Ferreira VF, Pinto AV, Pinto MCRF, Solange MSV, Wardell SMSV, Wardell JL. Synthesis of new aldehyde derivatives from β-lapachone and nor-β-lapachone. Arkivoc. 2003; 156-68.
Houghton PJ, Photiou A, Uddin S, Shah P, Browning M, Jackson SJ, Retsas S. Activity of extracts of Kigelia pinnata against melanoma and renal carcinoma cell lines. Planta Med. 1994; 60: 430-33
Jangala M, Manche S, Mudigonda S, Raja MK, Sangras BR, Konagurtu V. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of atenolol in Allium cepa L. Int J Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012; 2: 18-24.
Lee JC, Strobel GA, Lobkovsky E, Clardy JC. Torreyanic acid: A selectively cytotoxic quinone dimer from the endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis microspora. J Org Chem. 1996; 61: 3232-33.
Li JY, Stroble GA, Sidhu R, Hess WM, Ford EJ. Endophytic Taxol producing fungi from bald cypress, Taxodium distichum. Microbiology. 1996; 142: 2223-26.
Murray MT, Pizzorno JE. Encyclopedia of natural medicine 2nd ed. PA4 Rocklin, CA. Prima Pub 1998; pp. 967-72.
Ping KY, Darah I, Yusuf UK, Sasidharan S. Genotoxicity of Euphorbia hirta on Allium cepa assay. Int Conf Nutr Food Sci. 2012; 39: 222-25.
Raviraja NS, Maria GL, Sridhar KR. Antimicrobial evaluation of endophytic fungi inhabiting medicinal plants of the Western Ghats of India. English Life Sci. 2006; 6515-20.
Sadananda TS, Nirupama R, Chaithra K, Govindappa M, Chandrappa CP, Vinay Raghavendra B. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of endophytes from Tabebuia argentea and identification of anticancer agent (lapachol). J Med Plant Res. 2011; 5: 3643-52.
Sehgal R, Roy S, Kumar VL. Evaluation of cytotoxic potential of latex of Calotropis procera and Podophyllotoxin in Allum cepa root model. J Biocell. 2006; 30: 9-13.
Shweta S, Khadabadi S, Ganesh TG. In vitro antimitotic, antiproliferative, DNA fragmentation and anticancer activity of chloroform and ethanol extract of Revia hypocrarerformis. Asian Pacific J Trop Dis. 2012; S503-06.
Silva TMS, Camara CA, Barbosa TP, Soares AZ, Cunha LC, Pinto AC, Vargas MD. Design, synthesis and antifungal activity of a novel water soluble prodrug of antifungal triazole. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2005; 13: 193-96.
Stierle A, Strobel GA, Stierle D. Taxol and taxane production by Taxomyces andreanae, an endophytic fungus of Pacific yew. Science 1993; 260: 214-16.
Strobel G, Daisy B. Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev.2003; 67: 491-502
Subhadradevi V, Khairunissa K, Asokkumar K, Umamaheswari M, Sivashanmugam A, Jagannath P. Induction of apoptosis and cytotoxic activities of Apium graveolens Linn. using in vitro models. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2011; 9: 90-94.
Teixeira MJ, Almeida YM, Viana JR, Holanda Filha JG, Rodrigues TP, Prata JRC, Jr, Coelho ICB, Rao VS, Pompeu MML. In vitro and in vivo leishmanicidal activity of 2-hydroxy-3-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-1,4-naphthoquinone (lapachol). Phytother Res. 2001; 15: 44-48.
Theantana T, Hyde KD, Lumyong S. Aspaginase production by endophytic fungi from Thai medicinal plants: Cytotoxic properties. Int J Integra Biol. 2009; 7: 1-8.
Thomson RH. Naturally Occurring Quinones, III. Recent advances. London, Chapman and Hall, 1987, 142, pp 144-47.
Türk M, Kaya B, Menemen Y, Oğuztüzün S. Apoptotic and necrotic effects of plant extracts belonging to the genus Alchemilla L. species on HeLa cells in vitro.J Med Plants Res. 2011; 5: 4566-71.
Visalakchi S, Muthumary J. Taxol (anticancer drug) producing endophytic fungi: An overview. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 2010; 1: 1-9.
Wuerzberger SM, Pink JJ, Planch SM, Byers KL, Bornmann WG, Boothman DA. Induction of apoptosis in MCF-7:WS8 breast cancer cells by /3-lapachone1. Cancer Res. 1998; 58: 1876-85.
Yu SF, Chen TM, Chen YH. Apoptosis and necrosis are involved in the toxicity of Sauropus androgynus in an in vitro study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007; 106: 537-47.