Evaluation of prescribing pattern of the private practitioners by the undergraduate medical students

Authors

  • Zaida Rahman Enam Medical College
  • Rumana Nazneen
  • Mahmuda Begum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v4i1.1583

Keywords:

Medical student, Private practitioner, Rational prescribing

Abstract

To sensitize the fourth year undergraduate medical students about rational prescribing, 600 prescriptions of private practitioners were collected by them and analyzed using WHO/INRUD indicators. There were average 3.81 drugs per prescriptions. Drugs were prescribed in generic name only in 5 prescriptions. About 50% drugs were prescribed from the Essential Drug List; only 17.5% of prescriptions were complete in respect to patient medical information. Antibiotics were prescribed in 72.5% of the prescriptions; injections were prescribed in about 12.1% of the prescriptions. Although the exercise revealed few elementary aspects of the prescribing, the medical students participated in the exercise enthusiastically and perhaps understood the issues related to rational prescribing effectively.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
106
Download
155 Read
2

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2008-11-23

How to Cite

Rahman, Z., R. Nazneen, and M. Begum. “Evaluation of Prescribing Pattern of the Private Practitioners by the Undergraduate Medical Students”. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 4, no. 1, Nov. 2008, pp. 73-75, doi:10.3329/bjp.v4i1.1583.

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2009)

Section

Research Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).