Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Disease Burden among Rural Households in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study from Mirsharai, Chittagong

Authors

  • Md Zahirul Islam Resident, MD (Cardiology), National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Habibur Rahman Senior Research Assistant, IPDI Foundation. Dhaka, Bangladesh. E-mail: habib.ipdi21@gmail.com
  • Md Ebanul Rahman Resident MD (Radiation Oncology), NICRH, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Md Jewel Rana MD (Cardiology), National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Tanvir Ahmed Resident, MD (Cardiology), National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Nafiz Saadman Ahsan Resident, MD (Cardiology), National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mezbah Ul Hoque MS (Neurosurgery), BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Umme Kanij Fatema Clinical Research Assistant, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  • SA Shiblee Director, IPDI Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Mir Khalid Hossain M.Sc. student, Department of Statistics and Data science, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  • Mohsin Ahmed Professor & Head of the Department, Cardiology, Kurmitola General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Keywords:

Rural health, health expenditure, catastrophic spending, non-communicable diseases, Bangladesh, socioeconomic burden, health financing, out-of-pocket costs.

Abstract

Households in rural Bangladesh face severe financial hardship due to rising healthcare costs, particularly for chronic and non-communicable diseases. This study examined the patterns of illness, treatment practices, and catastrophic health expenditure among residents of Masjidia village, Mirsharai, Chittagong. A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2016 among 152 households to retrospectively assess healthcare utilization and expenditure patterns for 2015-2016. Convenience sampling was used due to geographical constraints. Catastrophic health expenditure was defined as spending exceeding 10% of total household income. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed descriptively. Illness prevalence was 84.2% among respondents. The average annual household income was BDT 35,352, while total healthcare expenditure accounted for 52.5% of this income, exceeding the catastrophic threshold by fivefold. Medication costs were the major expense, comprising 49–82% of total healthcare spending, followed by consultation, investigation, and transport costs. Most treatments were sought from private clinics and specialists, indicating high out-of-pocket dependency. The reliance on allopathic medicine remained dominant (above 94%), reflecting both accessibility and perceived efficacy. Health spending in rural Bangladesh imposes a catastrophic financial burden on households, driven primarily by medication costs and private-sector dependence. Targeted interventions—including subsidized essential medicines, expansion of community-based insurance, and improved public primary healthcare—are essential to reduce financial vulnerability and promote equitable access.

Bangladesh Med J. 2024 Sept; 53(3): 7-15

Abstract
320
PDF
297

Downloads

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

Zahirul Islam, M., Rahman, H., Ebanul Rahman, M., Jewel Rana, M., Ahmed, T., Saadman Ahsan, N., Hoque, M. U., Fatema, U. K., Shiblee, S., Khalid Hossain, M., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Disease Burden among Rural Households in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study from Mirsharai, Chittagong. Bangladesh Medical Journal, 53(3), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v53i3.85526

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Zahirul Islam, M., Rahman, H., Ebanul Rahman, M., Jewel Rana, M., Ahmed, T., Saadman Ahsan, N., Hoque, M. U., Fatema, U. K., Shiblee, S., Khalid Hossain, M., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Disease Burden among Rural Households in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study from Mirsharai, Chittagong. Bangladesh Medical Journal, 53(3), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v53i3.85526