Demographic characteristics |
Frequency |
Percentage(%) |
Age |
|
|
0-5 yrs |
5 |
20.0 |
6-10 yrs |
13 |
52.0 |
11-15 yrs |
7 |
28.0 |
Total |
25 |
100.0 |
Sex |
|
|
Male |
21 |
84.0 |
Female |
4 |
16.0 |
Age at disease onset (years) (mean±SD) |
5.50±2.37 |
|
Age at diagnosis (years) (mean±SD) |
6.54±2.58 |
|
Disease duration (years) |
|
|
1-3 yrs |
17 |
68.0 |
4-6 yrs |
7 |
28.0 |
7-9 yrs |
1 |
4.0 |
Treatment history |
||
MTX |
25 |
100% |
Hydroxychloroquine |
25 |
100% |
Prednisolone dose (mean±SD) |
0.635±0.123 |
Baseline |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
Presence of systemic features |
|
|
Fever |
25 |
100.0% |
Rash |
23 |
92.0% |
Lymphadenopathy |
21 |
84.0% |
Hepatomegaly |
23 |
92.0% |
Splenomegaly |
20 |
80.0% |
Serositis |
3 |
12.0% |
Lab parameters: |
Range |
Mean±SD |
Hb (%) |
5.7 – 11.4 |
9.04±1.38 |
ESR |
4.0 – 180.0 |
76.74±42.15 |
Platelet |
180.0 – 850.0 |
553.70±173.09 |
Total count |
5.0 – 35.0 |
15.20±7.00 |
Neutrophil |
52.0 – 84.0 |
70.48±7.82 |
ALT |
16.0 – 176.0 |
47.96±46.55 |
Serum Creatinine |
0.30 – 0.90 |
0.57±0.14 |
Variables |
Baseline |
At 6 months |
At 12 months |
p value |
||||||
Baseline Vs. |
Baseline |
|||||||||
Number of patients with active arthritis |
25(100.0%) |
10(45.45%) |
6 (27%) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|||||
Presence of systemic Features: |
|
|
||||||||
Fever |
25(100.0%) |
9(40.9%) |
6(27.27%) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Rash |
23(92%) |
7(31.8%) |
4(18.18%) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Lymphadenopathy |
21(84%) |
0 |
0 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Hepatomegaly |
23(92%) |
6(27.27%) |
0 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Splenomegaly |
20(80%) |
7(31.8%) |
0 |
0.004 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Serositis |
3(12.0%) |
0 |
0 |
0.233 |
0.233 |
|
||||
ESR* > 20 (mm in 1sthr) |
21(84%) |
11(50.0%) |
7(31.8%) |
0.006 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Physician’s Visual Analogue Scale |
7.99±0.71 |
4.35±1.92 |
1.30±1.56 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Number of patients with active disease |
25(100.0%) |
14(63.6%) |
9(40.9%) |
0.004 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Prednisolone (mg/kg) (mean+SD)# |
0.625±0.125 |
0.485±0.142 |
0.412±0.119 |
0.07 |
<0.001 |
|
Discussion
Systemic arthritis has a variable disease course. Among about the half of the patients the disease is characterized by monocyclic or intermittent course with relapses followed by remission. Remaining half of the patients, the disease follows an unremitting course.11 Persistently active systemic JIA represents a major challenge to paediatric rheumatologists. Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have limited benefit in this type of JIA.12 In a study, thalidomide was shown efficacious for treating refractory sJIA.10 The present study have also shown the efficacy of thalidomide therapy in 22 patients who were nonresponsive to traditional DMARDs. Before starting thalidomide they were offered biological therapy, but due to economic constraint they could not afford that. Boys and girls ratio was 5.25: 1 which was different from other established study.9 where boys and girls ratio was nearly 1: 1. This may be due to the fact that boys get more preference and attention by the male dominating society in Bangladesh and are taken to health service facilities early. Another study from Bangladesh also showed similar findings where M:F ratio among JIA patients were 2:1.13 The number of patients with active arthritis were significantly improved at 6th month (54.55%) and 12th month (73%) of follow-up when compared with time of enrollment (p<0.001). Systemic features like fever, rash, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly were also significantly improved in this study. Normalisation of acute phase reactant (ESR) was found in 68.2% cases. These findings were almost similar with Lehman et al’s results.10 García-Carrasco et al reported three cases of recalcitrant sJIA that improved dramatically after treatment with thalidomide.14 An Indian study with three children with refractory sJIA also reported improvement after treatment with thalidomide.6 Dose of steroid was reduced significantly in this study and two of our patients were able to discontinue prednisolone, whereas 6 (out of 13) patients were able to discontinue prednisolone in Lehman et al study.10 The difference may be explained by the facts that, perhaps severity of the disease at presentation might have been different in this study. Delay in diagnosis and treatment before seeking medical services might have also influenced the outcome. Thalidomide is a well-known teratogen which was withdrawn from market in 19615 but this risk is not a problem in this study population. Tolerability of thalidomide is generally found to be better with single night time administration. Thalidomide is a cheap and available drug in comparison to other biological agents.6 Common side effects in this study included transient elevation of aminotransferase in two cases and somnolence in three cases. Short lived paresthesia (tingling, numbness) were found during initial period of therapy in another study.10 No neurotoxicity amongstthe cases of this study was to be found though in literature neurotoxicity/ paraesthesia is commonly found.1Conclusion
Beneficial effects of thalidomide in sJIA patients as adjunct therapy were found in this study amongstthe patients, who were non responsive to traditional DMARDs. So, it may be concluded from this study that thalidomide may be used in children with sJIA who have failed to conventional therapy. Though the adverse effects of this drug were minimal, use of this drug in children should be carefully supervised.References