Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Prevalence and Its Risk Factors in Rural Bangladesh
Ghosh DK1*, Nath M1, Ghosh CK2, Ahmed A1, Rahim S1, Rowshon AHM1
1Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Principal Contact


Abstract

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a global disease, and evidence suggests that its prevalence is increasing. Prevalence estimates show considerable geographic variation. According to WHO, prevalence of GERD in far East Asia currently consistently lower than 10%, which is 8-20% in India. No such population based data are available in Bangladesh. Thus, the study was designed to determine the prevalence of GERD and its risk factors in rural community of Bangladesh. This descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out from January to June 2015 by using validated questionnaire through door to door interview among randomly selected 2000 participants in a rural community of Bangladesh. A cutoff point 3 was chosen as a valid and reliable scale to confirm GERD. Among the study participants, 1212 were male and 788 were female. Their average age range was 18 to 60 years. A total of 136 participants were found to have GERD symptoms and among them 43 were men and 93 were women. Thus, the prevalence of GERD in the study was 6.8%. GERD was highly associated with higher age group, women, Muslims, and participants with diabetes mellitus, asthma and overweight. Prevalence of GERD in rural community of Bangladesh is lower than that of the western world. For a better understanding on GERD, it is important that a study should be carried in a representative samples across Bangladesh.


Key Words: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Risk factors, Prevalence
Introduction

GERD is a global disease, and evidence suggests that its prevalence shows considerable geographic variation, and in far East Asia that prevalence estimates are currently consistently lower than western countries. The high prevalence of GERD, and hence of troublesome symptoms, has significant societal consequences, impacting adversely on work productivity and many other quality of life aspects for individual patients.

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is gradually increasing day by day in the world. GERD is estimated for symptoms at least once per week, varies greatly with ethnicity and geography: 18.1–27.8% in North America, 8.8–25.9% in Europe, and 2.5–7.8% in East Asia, as estimated from a number studies.1 GERD has traditionally been considered less common in Asian countries in comparison to western world.2,3 It has been shown in recent study report that its prevalence in India ranges between 8-20% which is comparable to that in the west.4-6

In Bangladesh, there is scarcity of data on the magnitude of the problem.7,8 A population-based survey reported a prevalence of heart-burn and or acid regurgitation at least monthly, at least weekly and daily was 5.5%, 5.25% and 2.5% respectively and overall, unadjusted estimate of GERD was 5.5 on questionnaire based.9

GERD affects quality of life of patients, reduces their functional activity, increases the economic burden and predisposes them to more serious conditions as in Barrett′s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma which is difficult to treat eventually.10-13 There are many factors whichare thought to be associated with GERD symptoms, including dietary factors, alcohol consumption, smoking, the intake of NSAIDs and sleeping position.14 Various studies indicate that increased body mass index (BMI) is also a risk factor for GERD.15

Patients who develop GERD can have symptoms without objective evidence of oesophagitis.16 Considering the limitations of objective medical testing, GERD symptoms play a vital role in the diagnosis of the problem. Heart burn and or acid regurgitation are considered to be reasonably specific symptoms for the diagnosis.17 Further diagnostic evaluation is necessary, if treatment is not responding properly, there should be alarm symptoms suggestive of complications or for confirmation of diagnosis prior to anti-reflux surgery.18,19 In some studies, it is reported that there is association of GERD with asthma, hoarseness of voice, dyspepsia, atypical chest pain and non-obstructive dysphagia.2,3,20

At the present time, questionnaires have been used as a useful diagnostic tool in the epidemiological settings of GERD. Questionnaires may quantify the characteristics of individual symptom (frequency, duration and severity) and also can measure the quality of life. The validity and reliability of symptom-based diagnosis of GERD has been proved in several studies.17,20-25 Awareness on prevalence estimates and associated risk factors of GERD in this population plays a part in defining local and national health needs and also to improve the management of these patients. Bangladesh is a developing country and there are few population based data regarding GERD and people are suffering from this condition from acute to severe. Therefore, the study was designed to determine the prevalence of GERD and its risk factors in rural community of Bangladesh.


Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Ghior, one of the largest Upzilla of Manikganj District in Bangladesh through the technical support from Department of Gastroenterology of Shaheed Suhrawardy Medial College from January to June 2015. Sampleswere selected using two-step random sampling technique. Ghior Upzilla consists of 7 (seven) unions, among those Unions, 3 (three) were selected by using lottery method. All the apparently healthy individual of either sex aged between 18 – 60 years of above mentioned area was included in this study. There were total 75,714 peoples aged between 18 – 60 years in the selected unions. Among the total population, 2000 were selected using simple random sampling. The data were collected by face to face interview of the respondents who met the selection criteria of the study. The participants who were not willingly to participate in this study had been excluded. Data collection instruments were a validated structured questionnaire and a checklist. The Questionnaire by Manterola et al provides a valid and reliable scale to detect GERD with a high sensitivity (91.6%) and specificity (94.9%).23 Data were collected through door to door interview of the respondents at the rural community. Before the interview, the detail of the study was explained to the eligible respondents and informed written consent was obtained (through undersigned or finger print) from every respondent. All interviews were carried out in a private setting according to the participants choice and safety. All the relevant collected data were compiled on a master chart first and then statistical analysis of the results was obtained by using windows-based computer software device with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-18) (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance of individual symptoms and combined symptoms were analysed by applying a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age and gender. The result was presented as odd ratios with 95% confidence intervals. A two- sided p value less than 0.05 was regarded as statically significant, and 95% confidence intervals was computed using a logistic regression model. Prior to the commencement of this study, the research protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Committee (NERC) of the BMRC.


Result

The study population consisted of 2000 participants, 60.6% male and 39.4% female. The male to female ratio in percentage was 121.2: 78.8. Nearly 88.9% of the sample population was married, among them 84.8% male, 95.2% female. In regard to the occupation of the respondent′s majority was from housewives (27%), about 23% from non-government employees and about 50% constituted other occupation like businessman, farmers, industrial worker and others. With respect to the educational background, more than 22% of the respondents were secondary education not completed and the next highest group 19.4% were secondary education completed, 15.9% were primary education completed, 13% were illiterate and 10.9% graduate and above. The highest literate women group (22%) belonged to class VI-X. About 56.7% of the respondents reported to earn a monthly income of Tk. 5000 – 10000.

Prevalence of Gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD): Out of 2000 participants screened for GERD using the Questionnaire by Manterola (cut off point 3), 136 cases were found to be positive, thus giving a prevalence of 6.8% (95% CI, 5.78 – 7.99).23 Age-wise distribution showed that majority of individuals associated with GERD belongs to age group 41 – 50 years (n= 26.4%) followed by age group 21 – 30 years (n=23.8%). Prevalence of GERD was the highest (11.8) in age group 30 – 40 years (95% CI, 9.14 – 15.12). Significantly, more women had GERD than men (11.8%, n=93 VS 3.55%, n=43; table-I).

Table I: Prevalence of GERD and demographic details of GERD Patients

Age

Number of participants

Number of GERD patients

Prevalence of GERD (95% CI)

Total

2000

136

6.80 (5.78 – 7.99)

Age stratification

 

 

 

≤ 20

75 (3.8)

2

2.67 (0.73 – 9.21)

21 – 30

476 (23.8)

32

6.72 (4.80 – 9.34)

31 – 40

449 (22.4)

53

11.80 (9.14 – 15.12)

41 – 50

528 (26.4)

35

6.63 (4.80 – 9.08)

51 – 60

472 (23.6)

14

2.30 (1.26 – 4.19)

Gender (p = 0.003)

 

 

 

Male

1212 (60.6%)

43

3.55 (2.64 – 4.74)

Female

788 (39.4%)

93

11.80 (9.73 – 14.24)


Risk factor of GERD: Prevalence of GERD was dominant among betel and tobacco chewer followed by smoker. Body Mass Index, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, asthma have association with GERD. It has been observed that prevalence of GERD is more among obese and overweight patient (table-II).

Table II: Risk factors of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Risk factos

Number of participants

Number of GERD patients

Prevalence of GERD (95% CI)

Smoker

520 (26.0%)

13

2.50 (1.47 – 4.23)

Betel nut

629 (31.4%)

32

5.09 (3.63 – 7.09)

Tobacco

479 (24.0%)

27

5.64 (3.90 – 8.08)

Alcoholic

40 (2.0%)

2

5.00 (1.38 – 16.50)

Vegetarian

92 (4.6%)

8

8.70 (4.47 – 16.23)

Co-morbidity

 

 

 

DM

108 (5.4%)

18

16.67 (10.81 – 24.81)

HTN

154 (7.7%)

18

11.69 (7.52 – 17.72)

IHD

54 (2.7%)

6

11.11 (5.19 – 22.19)

Asthma

80 (4.0%)

12

15.00 (8.79 – 24.41)

BMI

 

 

 

Under weight

35 (1.8%)

4

11.43 (4.54 – 25.95)

Normal weight

749 (37.4%)

29

3.87 (2.71 – 5.51)

Over weight

621 (31.0%)

61

9.82 (7.72 – 12.42)

Obese

595 (29.8%)

42

7.06 (5.26 – 9.40)

Endoscopy findings of GERD patients: Most of the clinical diagnosed (according to scale) GERD patients (n=136) have normal endoscopic finding (n=74).

Symptoms of GERD according to religion and sex: Presence of Heartburn in this population at least once a week was 19% followed by Heartburn with regurgitation was 7% (table-III).

Table III: Symptoms of GERD according to religion and sex

Symptoms of GERD

Muslim

Hindu

Total
n (%)

Male
n (%)

Female
n (%)

Total
n (%)

Male
n (%)

Female
n (%)

Total
n (%)

Normal

653 (65.7)

415 (64.8)

1068 (65.4)

148 (67.9)

110 (74.3)

258 (70.5)

1326 (66.3)

Heartburn only

211 (21.2)

107 (16.7)

318 (19.5)

44 (20.2)

18 (12.2)

62 (16.9)

380 (19.0)

Regurgitation only

94 (9.5)

37 (5.8)

131 (8.0)

16 (7.3)

12 (8.1)

28 (7.7)

159 (8.0)

Heartburn with regurgitation

36 (3.6)

81 (12.7)

117 (7.2)

10 (4.6)

8 (5.4)

18 (4.9)

135 (6.8)

Total

944 (100.0)

640 (100.0)

1634 (100.0)

218 (100.0)

148 (100.0)

366 (100.0)

2000 (100.0)

Factors associated with gastroesophageal reflux diseases: Logistic regression analysis female sex Muslim, DM, Asthma and overweight were significantly associated with presence of GERD (table IV).

Table IV: Logistic regression of risk factors of GERD patients

 

B

S.E.

Wald

Sig.

OR

95% C.I.for OR

Lower

Upper

Gender (Male)

-1.185

0.222

28.432

0.000

.306

.198

.473

Religion (Muslim)

1.142

0.339

11.325

0.001

3.133

1.611

6.092

DM (Positive)

.671

0.339

3.931

0.047

1.957

1.008

3.799

HTN (Positive)

.418

0.327

1.633

0.201

1.519

.800

2.882

IHD (Positive)

-.419

0.618

.458

0.498

.658

.196

2.211

Asthma (Positive)

.889

0.459

3.757

0.053

2.433

.990

5.978

Normal weight

-.459

0.227

4.096

0.043

.632

.406

.986

Smoker

-.106

0.173

.373

0.542

.900

.641

1.263

Betel Nut chewer

-.197

0.309

.406

0.524

.821

.448

1.505

Tobacco chewer

.150

0.331

.206

0.650

1.162

.607

2.225

Alcoholic

-1.005

0.775

1.679

0.195

.366

.080

1.674

Vegetarian

-.007

0.438

.000

0.987

.993

.421

2.340

Total

2000

100.0

Discussion


This descriptive cross-sectional study has shown a low prevalence (6.8%) of GERD in a general population residing in rural community of Bangladesh and significantly associated with Body Mass Index, DM, HTN and Asthma. Prevalence of GERD was dominant among betel and tobacco chewer followed by smoker. It has been observed that prevalence of GERD is more among obese and overweight patient in the study.

GERD is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorders. GERD has an adverse impact on patients quality of life and also is the most important predisposing factor for Barrett′s esophagus and intestinal metaplasia of esophageal mucosa that predisposes to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.26–29 In addition to the risk of cancer, GERD is well recognized to be associated with some upper respiratory diseases that have some troublesome effects on the quality of life. So, it is crucial to diagnose GERD early to protect patients from the above-mentioned serious complications of GERD.

The prevalence of GERD varies among different geographical areas and among investigators even in the same geographical area. A gulf of difference in the reported GERD prevalence is mainly attributed to the differences in the methods used by each investigator as well as to the absence of a generally adopted definition of GERD. There is no gold standard diagnostic test for GERD. Most common investigations like upper GI endoscopy and 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring lack sensitivity and have several limitations.30-32 Questionnairebased diagnosis of GERD is reliable with high sensitivity and specificity. In the present study the prevalence of GERD based on questionnaire (cut-off point 3) was 6.8% which is similar to population-based survey in Korea, Singapore, China, Iran and Indiabut is lower than that in the western population.4,21-25,34-38 The prevalence of GERD in this study was lower than that of only population-based study in Dhaka city (40.9%).7 Only published study8 involved Out Patient Department (OPD) population of a referral center of Dhaka city and reported a GERD prevalence of 22.8%. This significant difference may be due to selected population who came for consultation in Gastroenterology outpatient clinic. Presence of heartburn in this population at least once a week was 19% followed by Heartburn with regurgitation was 7%. The corresponding prevalence’s reported by Masud were 17.2% and 12.5% respectively.8 Studies from United Stated of America (USA) showed that heart burn and or acid regurgitation occurred in approximately in 7% of adult population on a daily basis, 14-20% on a weekly basis and 44% on monthly basis.20,39 A Chinese population survey reported that the annual, monthly and weekly prevalence rates of GERD were 29.8%, 8.9% and 2.5% respectively in their population.22 The weekly prevalence of GERD on the basis of heart-burn and or acid regurgitation in Korea (3.0%)33 is comparable to our study. Geographic differences in GERD prevalence estimates are difficult to interpret, but may be related to differences in study definitions, questionnaire used, population selection and socio-cultural factors. In this series prevalence estimates of GERD were higher among women than men based on symptom score (11.8% versus 3.55%). This prevalence is comparable to the finding in India,4 but higher than that of Korea33 and lower than that of China22 and western countries like USA,20 Belgium36 and Sweden.37 Differences in GERD prevalence estimates may be due to differences in dietary habit, environmental and socio-cultural factors and work pattern. GERD prevalence was equal in both men and women in USA20 but in Belgium prevalence was more in women (31.1% and 25.6% respectively).36 GERD is variably associated with age of the respondents. On multiple logistic regression analysis an increasing prevalence of GERD was found with increasing age in our study. In our survey highest prevalence was found in the 31 – 40 years in age group. The finding conforms to the finding of Shahed et al. and in China highest prevalence was found in 30-39 years in age group and in Japan in 40-49 years age group was more vulnerable. On the other hand, studies from USA, Korea, Singapore, Belgium and Spain failed to show any association of GERD with age.7,20,25,33,36,38,40 BMI was found as a risk factor for GERD in the studies from China, Spain and Dhaka. But 112 studies from korea and Iran found no association between GERD and BMI.7,33,38,40,41 In this series, BMI was also found as a significant risk factor for GERD. Association between smoking and GERD is controversial. Several reports showed direct relationship of GERD with smoking.14 However, studies from Spain and India did not find any relation between smoking and GERD.34,38 In this study association of GERD with smoking was unclear which is consistent with the finding of Masud.8 Most of the clinical diagnosed (according to scale)GERD patients (n=136) have normal endoscopic finding. On Logistic regression analysis female sex,muslim, DM, Asthma and overweight were significantly associated with presence of GERD.



Conclusion


Through the prevalence of GERD in rural community of Bangladesh was 6.8% in the study which is lower than that of western world. Again, the prevalence of GERD is higher in 31-40 age group (11.80) than the other participants.This questionnaire-based community survey showed that the prevalence of which is less than that of western world.Higher body mass index, DM, presence of Asthma is significantly associated with GERD in this study. There is not significant association between smoking and GERD but extensive research is required involving different population in different parts of country and preferably with some investigations for exact estimation of the disease burden so that pragmatic health care can be planned.At present, the study is very important and should be carried on all over the Bangladesh for the better understanding on GERD.


Acknowledgement


Authors acknowledge the financial support of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council to conduct this study. They are also grateful to all colleagues of the Department of Gastroenterology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical Hospital, Dhaka.


References


  1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014; 63:871-80.
  2. Sontag SJ, Schnell TG, Miller TQ, Khandelwal S, O′Connel S, CheifeeG, et al. Prevalence of oesophagitis in asthmatics. Gut 1992; 33:872-76.
  3. Field SKK, Underwood M, Brant R, CowieRL.Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in asthma. Chest. 1996;109: 316-22.
  4. Bhatia SJ, Reddy DN, Ghoshal UC, Jayanthi V, Abraham P, Choudhuri G, et al. ISG Task Force Report: Epidemiology and symptom profile of gastroesophageal reflux in the Indian population: Report of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology Task Force. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2011; 30:118-27.
  5. Sharma PK, Ahuja V, Madan K, Gupta S, Raizada A, Sharma MP. Prevalence, severity, and risk factors of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease among employees of a large hospital in Northern India. Indian Journal of gastroenterology 2011:30:128-34.
  6. Kumar S, Sharma S, Norboo T, Dolma D, Norboo A, Stobdan T,et al. Population based study to assess prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a high altitude area.Indian J Gastoenterology 2011 30:135-43.
  7. Shahed MM. Epidemiological study of gastroesophageal reflux disease in an urban population using a validated questionnaire (Thesis), Dhaka, BangaBandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University. 2006 January: 150P.
  8. Rahman MM, Kibria MG, Miah MAR, Bhuiyan MMR, Hasan M. Prevalence of gastro oesophageal reflux disease in outpatient population of a referral centre using a validated questionnaire. Bangladesh J Medicine, 2005; 16: 68-74.
  9. Shaha M, Perveen I, Alamgir MJ, Masud MH, Rahman MH.Prevalence and risk factors for gastro-esophageal reflux disease in the North-Eastern part of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2012; 38: 108-13.
  10. Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M, Adams E, Cronin K, Goodman C, et al. The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122:1500-11.
  11. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340:825-31.
  12. Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA. Outpatient physiologic testing and surgical management of foregut motility disorders. CurrProbl Surg 1992; 29:415-555.
  13. Gaddam S, Sharma P. Shedding light on the epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in India a big step forward. Indian J Gastroenterology2011; 30:105-07.
  14. Nocon M, Labenz J, Willich SN. Lifestyle factors and symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux-apopulationbased study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:169-74
  15. Sharma P, Wani S, Romero Y, Johnson D, Hamilton F. Racial and geographic issues in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:2669-80.
  16. Lim SL, Goh WT, Lee JM, NgTP, HoKY. Community Medicine GI study group. Changing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux with changing time: longitudinal study in an Asian population J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 200: 995-1001.
  17. Klauser Ag, Schindlbeck NE, Muuler-Listner SA. Symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Lancet 1990;335: 205-08.
  18. Kahrila PJ, Pandoltino JE. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications, including Barrett′s metaplasis. In: Feldman M Friedman LS and Sleisenger MH (eds): Sleisinger and Fordtan′s Gastrointestinal and Liver disease: patjophysiology, diagnosis, management -7th ed. Elsvier Science (USA), 2002, pp. 640-63.
  19. deVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 190-200.
  20. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Fell SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a populationbased study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1448-56.
  21. Khosbaten M. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in Nortwestern Tabriz, Iran. Indian J Gastroenterol 2003;22: 138-39.
  22. Wong WM, Lai KC, Lam KFK, Hui WM, Hu WH, Lam CLK, et al. Prevalence, clinical spectrum and health care utilization of gastroesophageal disease in a Chinese population: a population-based study. Aliment PharmacolTher 2003; 18:595-604.
  23. Manterola C, Munoz S, Grandes L, Bustos L. Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease in epidemiological settings. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2002;55: 1041-45.
  24. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR. A new questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Mayo Clin Proc 1994; 69: 539-47.
  25. Ho KY, Kang JY, Seow A. prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in a multiracial Asian population, with particular reference to reflux-type symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 1816-22.
  26. Farrow DC, Vaughan TL, Sweeney C, Gammon MD, Chow WH, Risch HA, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, use of H2 receptor antagonists, and risk of esophageal and gastric cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:231-38.
  27. Wu AH, Tseng CC, Bernstein L. Hiatal hernia, reflux symptoms, body size, and risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2003;98:940-48.
  28. Anderson LA, Watson RG, Murphy SJ, Johnston BT, Comber H, Mc Guigan J, et al. Risk factors for Barrett′s oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR study. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:1585-94.
  29. Whiteman DC, Sadeghi S, Pandeya N, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Bain CJ, et al. Combined effects of obesity, acid reflux and smoking on the risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus. Gut. 2008;57:173-80.
  30. Nandukar S, Tally NJ. Epidemiology and natural history of reflux disease. Bailliere′s Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 14: 743-53.
  31. Vitale GC, Rimmer AR, Hunter BE, et al. Computerised system for 24-hour oesophageal pH recording in the ambulatory patient . Gut 1983; 24:A468.
  32. Quigly EM. 24 H pH monitoring for gastrooesophageal reflux disease: Already standard but not gold. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 1071-75.
  33. Cho YS, Choi MG, Jeong JJ, Chung WC, Lee IS, Kim SW, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Asan-si, korea. Am j gastroenterol 2005; 100: 747-53.
  34. Sharma PK, Ahuja V, Madan K, Gupta S, Raizada A, Sharma MP. Prevalence, severity, and risk factors of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease among employees of a large hospital in India. Indian J Gastroenterol 2011; 30:128-34.
  35. ffman JJ, Shaw M, Sadik K, Grogg A, Emery K, Lee J, et al. Identifying patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: Validation of a practical screening too. Digestive Disease and Sciences 2002;47: 1863-69.
  36. Lous E, DeLooze D, Deorez P, Hiele M, Urbain D, Pelckmans P, et al. Heartburn in Belgium: prevalence, impact on daily life, and utilization of medical resources. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14: 279-84.
  37. Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T, Johansson S, Lind T, Bolling-Sternevald E, et al. High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and oesophagitis with or without symptoms in the general adult Swedish population: A Kalixanda study report. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 275-85.
  38. Diaz-Rubio M, Moreno-Elola-Olaso C, Locke GR, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux: prevalence, severity, duration and associated factors in a Spanish population. Alimental PharmacolTher 2004; 19: 95-105.
  39. Nebel OT, Fornes MF, Castell DO. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: incidence and precipitating factors. Dig Dis Sci 1976; 21: 953-56.
  40. Wang JH, Luo JY, Dong L, Gong J, Tong M. Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A general population based study in Xi′an of northwest China. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10: 1647-51.
  41. Solhpour A, Pourhoseingholi MA, Sotani F, Zarghi A, Habibi M, Ghafarnejad F, et al.Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and body mass index: no relation among the Iranian population. Indian J Gastroenterol 2008;27: 153-55