When leaders fail: Exploring the role of dysfunctional leader cells in autoimmune disease pathogenesis
Authors
- Falah Hasan Obayes AL-Khikani
Department of Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, College of Medical Technology, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraqhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-7090
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i2.79761Keywords
Downloads
Correspondence
Publication history
Responsible editor
Reviewers
Funding
Ethical approval
Trial registration number
Declaration
Copyright
Published by Bangabandhu Sheikh
Mujib Medical University (currently, Bangladesh Medical University).
The precise mechanisms by which dysfunctional leader cells could trigger or perpetuate autoimmunity are likely multifaceted. Aberrant tissue repair responses represent a key pathway; failure of leader cells to properly orchestrate repair can lead to chronic inflammation, excessive release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and inappropriate exposure of self-antigens, providing triggers for autoreactive immune responses [4, 5]. Furthermore, dysfunctional leader cells might alter the local immune microenvironment through dysregulated production of cytokines, chemokines, or extracellular vesicles, shifting the balance towards a pro-inflammatory state and impairing regulatory immune cell function [6, 7]. Specific leader cell populations have been implicated in tissues prone to autoimmune attack. For instance, in the pancreas, specialized 'hub' or 'leader' beta cells that normally coordinate islet responses could, if dysfunctional, contribute to the inflammatory milieu and beta cell destruction seen in Type 1 Diabetes [8, 9]. Similarly, compromised leader cell function during repair in epithelial tissues like the gut or skin could impair barrier integrity, potentially driving conditions like inflammatory bowel diseases or psoriasis [7, 10].
This leader cell perspective complements established autoimmune mechanisms like genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers [3]. However, significant challenges remain. Distinguishing whether leader cell dysfunction is a primary cause or a secondary consequence of the autoimmune process (cause or effect) is crucial. Experimental hurdles include the precise identification and specific manipulation of leader cells in vivo within complex tissue environments. Furthermore, the potential overlap in mechanisms between leader cells in repair and cancer necessitates caution when considering therapeutic interventions [1].
Categories | Number (%) |
Sex |
|
Male | 36 (60.0) |
Female | 24 (40.0) |
Age in yearsa | 8.8 (4.2) |
Education |
|
Pre-school | 20 (33.3) |
Elementary school | 24 (40.0) |
Junior high school | 16 (26.7) |
Cancer diagnoses |
|
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia | 33 (55) |
Retinoblastoma | 5 (8.3) |
Acute myeloid leukemia | 4 (6.7) |
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma | 4 (6.7) |
Osteosarcoma | 3 (5) |
Hepatoblastoma | 2 (3.3) |
Lymphoma | 2 (3.3) |
Neuroblastoma | 2 (3.3) |
Medulloblastoma | 1 (1.7) |
Neurofibroma | 1 (1.7) |
Ovarian tumour | 1 (1.7) |
Pancreatic cancer | 1 (1.7) |
Rhabdomyosarcoma | 1 (1.7) |
aMean (standard deviation) |
Categories | Number (%) |
Sex |
|
Male | 36 (60.0) |
Female | 24 (40.0) |
Age in yearsa | 8.8 (4.2) |
Education |
|
Pre-school | 20 (33.3) |
Elementary school | 24 (40.0) |
Junior high school | 16 (26.7) |
Cancer diagnoses |
|
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia | 33 (55) |
Retinoblastoma | 5 (8.3) |
Acute myeloid leukemia | 4 (6.7) |
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma | 4 (6.7) |
Osteosarcoma | 3 (5) |
Hepatoblastoma | 2 (3.3) |
Lymphoma | 2 (3.3) |
Neuroblastoma | 2 (3.3) |
Medulloblastoma | 1 (1.7) |
Neurofibroma | 1 (1.7) |
Ovarian tumour | 1 (1.7) |
Pancreatic cancer | 1 (1.7) |
Rhabdomyosarcoma | 1 (1.7) |
aMean (standard deviation) |