Climate change, disability, and physical and rehabilitation medicine: A call for inclusive health action

Authors

DOI:

Keywords

climate change, rehabilitation, disability, health, people with disability  

Correspondence

Bhasker Amatya
Email: bhasker.amatya@mh.org.au

Publication history

Received: 4 Oct 2025
Accepted: 11 Dec 2025
Published online: 15 Dec 2025

Responsible editor

Reviewer


Funding

None

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Trial registration number

Not applicable

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2025; all rights reserved. 
Published by Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (currently Bangladesh Medical University).
Abstract

Background: Climate change is an escalating global health emergency with widespread and disproportionate effects on populations. Despite representing over one billion individuals worldwide, people with disabilities (PwD) remain largely overlooked in climate adaptation and health planning. The health consequences of climate change for PwD are multifaceted and profound. This article aims to elaborate on the intersection of climate change and disability, explore the disproportionate impacts of climate change on PwD, emphasizing the pivotal role of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) professionals.

Methods: This narrative review synthesizes expert perspectives to examine the intersection of climate change, disability, and health. A focused review of literature identified key themes and policy gaps, complemented by conceptual analysis highlighting the implications for PRM.

Results: The complex interplay between climate change and disability is shaped by environmental stressors, health system disruptions, and pre-existing functional limitations. Evidence suggests that during climate-related events, PwD experience disproportionate impacts, including heightened morbidity, barriers to accessing essential services, and greater socio-economic and psychosocial vulnerability. PRM professionals are uniquely positioned to respond to the challenges of climate change through their expertise in functional restoration, long-term care, and disability-inclusive health services. However, rehabilitation remains underrepresented in many national and international climate response frameworks. The integration of rehabilitation into climate-resilient health systems requires all-inclusive governance, adaptive infrastructure, workforce capacity building, disability-focused research, and strengthened global partnerships.

Conclusion: There is an urgent need to embed rehabilitation within climate change policies to ensure equitable, sustainable, and inclusive health systems. PRM professionals have a pivotal role in shaping and implementing these strategies, advocating for the rights and needs of PwD in the evolving climate crisis. A structured roadmap for climate-resilient, rehabilitation-inclusive health systems is essential to achieve health equity and resilience for all.

Key messages
Climate change is a major health crisis, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations, especially people with disabilities, due to physiological, mobility, and socioeconomic challenges. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine professionals can play a vital role in mitigating these impacts through care, education, and advocacy. Global collaboration amongst all stakeholders is essential to build climate-resilient, rehabilitation-inclusive health systems.
Introduction

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change defines climate change as “any change in climate over time, whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity” [1]. Climate change is widely recognized as one of the most significant public health emergencies of the 21st century, with over 3.3 billion people living in contexts highly vulnerable to climate hazards [12]. Its effects are felt globally, with projections indicating a steady intensification of extreme weather events, rising sea levels, food and water insecurity, forced displacement, and environmental degradation, which pose critical risks to health and well-being [3].

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that between 2030 and 2050, climate change will contribute to an additional 250,000 deaths annually due to heat stress, malnutrition, vector-borne diseases, and diarrheal illnesses, etc., with associated direct health costs expected to reach between US$2 to 4 billion per year by 2030 [2]. These projections do not account for indirect impacts and socio-economic burden, such as the collapse of health infrastructure, mental health deterioration, and displacement-related trauma, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. The recently published ‘The 2025 Lancet Countdown’ report highlights that climate change is already exerting significant and measurable impacts on global health [4]. The report indicates that heat-related mortality has increased by an estimated 63% since the 1990s, with approximately 546,000 deaths annually from 2012–2021 [4]. Furthermore, it documents a widening spectrum of climate-related health risks, including increased exposure to wildfire-related air pollution, deteriorating food insecurity, heightened vulnerability to climate-sensitive infectious diseases, and substantial reductions in economic productivity [4]. Climate change has profound impacts on human health, particularly for vulnerable populations such as individuals with pre-existing health conditions, older adults, children, low-income communities, and people with disabilities (PwD) [56]. PwD represents a particularly at-risk group due to existing health disparities, limited mobility, and systemic marginalization from health, social, and emergency response systems [5]. An analytical study on this issue, conducted by the United Nations (UN), identifies the disproportionate impact of climate change on this vulnerable population and human rights obligations of member States, emphasizing the need for disability-inclusive climate action [5].

Health consequences of climate change

Climate change poses significant and multifaceted threats to human health, both directly and indirectly [57]. Direct health impacts include those resulting from temperature extremes (e.g., heat waves, cold spells), natural disasters (e.g., floods, hurricanes, droughts, wildfires), and environmental degradation. These can cause injuries, fatalities, and acute exacerbations of chronic conditions like cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [8]. These events are increasing in frequency and intensity due to rising global temperatures and shifting climatic patterns [1]. For instance, extreme heat is associated with dehydration, heat exhaustion, heat stroke, and cardiovascular strain, which can be fatal, especially among individuals with pre-existing medical conditions [89]. Moreover, extreme weather events can lead to physical trauma, interruptions in healthcare delivery, and long-term disability, particularly when health systems are overwhelmed or infrastructure is damaged. Indirect effects are subtler but equally damaging, and include changes in vector ecology leading to infectious disease outbreaks, disruption of food systems causing malnutrition, reduced access to clean water and sanitation, and declines in air quality due to pollution, etc [1011]. For example, higher temperatures and increased rainfall variability have expanded the geographical range of vector-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue, and Zika virus [12]. Waterborne diseases such as cholera and typhoid are more likely to spread in flood-prone or drought-stricken areas due to contamination or scarcity of clean water sources [10]. Concurrently, air pollution, exacerbated by wildfires and fossil fuel combustion, is linked to increased morbidity and mortality from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. According to WHO estimates, ambient air pollution was responsible for approximately 4.2 million premature deaths in 2016, primarily due to stroke, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and lung cancer [13]. These can significantly affect one’s mental health, such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, etc., either by direct trauma from extreme events, or by climate-related stressors, including displacement and loss of livelihood, stress of economic and social disruption [714].

Populations with chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, COPD, and neurological disorders like stroke or multiple sclerosis (MS) are especially sensitive to climate-related stressors. For example, individuals with MS are known to experience worsening of fatigue and motor dysfunction in hot conditions due to impaired thermoregulation and neural conduction [15]. Further, individuals with cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness (e.g., COPD), or neurological conditions such as stroke often experience worsening symptoms under heat stress or pollution exposure [1314]. These physiological responses can significantly reduce functional independence and quality of life. Moreover, mental health issues related to climate change, such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, are increasingly recognized, particularly among those already experiencing social disadvantage [16].

Climate change amplifies existing health disparities and challenges health systems to deliver accessible, continuous, and responsive care to those most at risk [5]. The complex interplay between environmental stressors, health system disruptions, and social determinants of health requires integrated, equitable, climate-smart healthcare systems [57]. Figure 1 summarizes the potential impact of climate change on health, which interacts and overlaps depending on climatic variability.

Source: Amatya B and Khan F[7]

PTSD indicates post-traumatic stress disorder; a Manifest uniquely in people with disabilities, b Floods, droughts, hurricanes, storms, wildfires, etc
Figure 1 Potential climate change-related health impacts and vulnerabilities
Impact of climate change on PwD

PwD, accounting for 16% of the world’s population (estimated at over 1.3 billion people), faces heightened risks from climate change due to systemic vulnerabilities and inequalities, reduced adaptive capacity, and limited access to health and social services [517]. These make them especially susceptible to health and psychosocial impacts. According to the UN Human Rights Council, PwD face disproportionate risks of injury, disease, and death during climate-related events, and are often excluded from emergency preparedness and response [5]. A 2022 scoping review by Lindsay et al found that extreme weather events worsened pre-existing conditions among PwD, increased mental health burden, and heightened exposure to physical injury and trauma [18]. Furthermore, displaced PwD often faces prolonged separation from caregivers, difficulty accessing medication and rehabilitation, and deteriorating health.

Gaskin et al highlighted four key dimensions of vulnerability in PwD using the ICF framework: impairments in body function, activity limitations, environmental barriers, and personal disadvantages such as age, gender, and income [19]. Despite these challenges, climate policy and health system adaptation strategies often fail to include PwD in a meaningful way, signaling a critical policy gap [5]. Further, the Lancet report calls for urgent, intersectional action to break down systemic barriers faced by PwD worldwide [4].

Some of the potential intersecting vulnerabilities in PwD from the impact of climate change include (but are not limited to) [25717-21]:

Variables  

Frequency (%)

Indication of colposcopy

 

Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid positive

200 (66.7)

Abnormal pap test

13 (4.3)

Human papilloma virus DNA positive

4 (1.3)

Suspicious looking cervix

14 (4.7)

Others (per vaginal discharge, post-coital bleeding)

69 (23.0)

Histopathological diagnosis

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1

193 (64.3)

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2

26 (8.7)

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3

32 (10.7)

Invasive cervical cancer

27 (9.0)

Chronic cervicitis

17 (5.6)

Squamous metaplasia

5 (1.7)

Groups based on pre-test marks

Pretest
marks (%)

Posttest

Marks (%)

Difference in pre and post-test marks (mean improvement)

P

Didactic lecture classes

<50%

36.6 (4.8)

63.2 (9.4)

26.6

<0.001

≥50%

52.8 (4.5)

72.4 (14.9)

19.6

<0.001

Flipped classes

<50%

36.9 (4.7)

82.2 (10.8)

45.4

<0.001

≥50%

52.8 (4.6)

84.2 (10.3)

31.4

<0.001

Data presented as mean (standard deviation)

Background characteristics

Number (%)

Age at presentation (weeks)a

14.3 (9.2)

Gestational age at birth (weeks)a

37.5 (2.8)

Birth weight (grams)a

2,975.0 (825.0)

Sex

 

Male

82 (41)

Female

118 (59)

Affected side

 

Right

140 (70)

Left

54 (27)

Bilateral

6 (3)

Delivery type

 

Normal vaginal delivery

152 (76)

Instrumental delivery

40 (20)

Cesarean section

8 (4)

Place of delivery

 

Home delivery by traditional birth attendant

30 (15)

Hospital delivery by midwife

120 (60)

Hospital delivery by doctor

50 (25)

Prolonged labor

136 (68)

Presentation

 

Cephalic

144 (72)

Breech

40 (20)

Transverse

16 (8)

Shoulder dystocia

136 (68)

Maternal diabetes

40 (20)

Maternal age (years)a

27.5 (6.8)

Parity of mother

 

Primipara

156 (78)

Multipara

156 (78)

aMean (standard deviation), all others are n (%)

Background characteristics

Number (%)

Age at presentation (weeks)a

14.3 (9.2)

Gestational age at birth (weeks)a

37.5 (2.8)

Birth weight (grams)a

2,975.0 (825.0)

Sex

 

Male

82 (41)

Female

118 (59)

Affected side

 

Right

140 (70)

Left

54 (27)

Bilateral

6 (3)

Delivery type

 

Normal vaginal delivery

152 (76)

Instrumental delivery

40 (20)

Cesarean section

8 (4)

Place of delivery

 

Home delivery by traditional birth attendant

30 (15)

Hospital delivery by midwife

120 (60)

Hospital delivery by doctor

50 (25)

Prolonged labor

136 (68)

Presentation

 

Cephalic

144 (72)

Breech

40 (20)

Transverse

16 (8)

Shoulder dystocia

136 (68)

Maternal diabetes

40 (20)

Maternal age (years)a

27.5 (6.8)

Parity of mother

 

Primipara

156 (78)

Multipara

156 (78)

aMean (standard deviation), all others are n (%)

Mean escape latency of acquisition day

Groups                 

NC

SC

ColC

Pre-SwE Exp

Post-SwE Exp

Days

 

 

 

 

 

1st

26.2 (2.3)

30.6 (2.4) 

60.0 (0.0)b

43.2 (1.8)b

43.8 (1.6)b

2nd

22.6 (1.0) 

25.4 (0.6)

58.9 (0.5)b

38.6 (2.0)b

40.5 (1.2)b

3rd

14.5 (1.8) 

18.9 (0.4) 

56.5 (1.2)b

34.2 (1.9)b 

33.8 (1.0)b

4th

13.1 (1.7) 

17.5 (0.8) 

53.9 (0.7)b

35.0 (1.6)b

34.9 (1.6)b

5th

13.0 (1.2) 

15.9 (0.7) 

51.7 (2.0)b

25.9 (0.7)b 

27.7 (0.9)b

6th

12.2 (1.0) 

13.3 (0.4) 

49.5 (2.0)b

16.8 (1.1)b

16.8 (0.8)b

Average of acquisition days

5th and 6th 

12.6 (0.2)

14.6 (0.8)

50.6 (0.7)b

20.4 (2.1)a

22.4 (3.2)a

NC indicates normal control; SC, Sham control; ColC, colchicine control; SwE, swimming exercise exposure.

aP <0.05; bP <0.01.

Categories

Number (%)

Sex

 

   Male

36 (60.0)

   Female

24 (40.0)

Age in yearsa

8.8 (4.2)

Education

 

   Pre-school

20 (33.3)

   Elementary school

24 (40.0)

   Junior high school

16 (26.7)

Cancer diagnoses

 

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

33 (55)

Retinoblastoma

5 (8.3)

Acute myeloid leukemia

4 (6.7)

Non-Hodgkins lymphoma

4 (6.7)

Osteosarcoma

3 (5)

Hepatoblastoma

2 (3.3)

Lymphoma

2 (3.3)

Neuroblastoma

2 (3.3)

Medulloblastoma

1 (1.7)

Neurofibroma

1 (1.7)

Ovarian tumour

1 (1.7)

Pancreatic cancer

1 (1.7)

Rhabdomyosarcoma

1 (1.7)

aMean (standard deviation)

Test results

Disease

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Yes

No

Reid’s score ≥ 5

Positive

10

15

37.0

94.5

40.1

93.8

Negative

17

258

 

 

 

 

Swede score ≥ 5

Positive

20

150

74.1

45.0

11.8

94.6

Negative

7

123

 

 

 

 

Swede score ≥ 8

Positive

3

21

11.1

92.3

12.5

91.3

Negative

24

252

 

 

 

 

High-grade indicates a score of ≥5 in both tests; PPV indicates positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value

Test

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Positive predictive value (%)

Negative predictive value (%)

Reid’s score ≥ 5

37.0

94.5

40.0

93.8

Swede score ≥ 5

74.1

45

11.8

94.6

Swede score ≥ 8

11.1

92.3

12.5

91.3

Test

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Positive predictive value (%)

Negative predictive value (%)

Reid’s score ≥ 5

37.0

94.5

40.0

93.8

Swede score ≥ 5

74.1

45

11.8

94.6

Swede score ≥ 8

11.1

92.3

12.5

91.3

Narakas classification

Total

200 (100%)

Grade 1

72 (36%)

Grade 2

64 (32%)

Grade 3

50 (25%)

Grade 4

14 (7%)

Complete recoverya

107 (54)

60 (83)

40 (63)

7 (14)

-

Near complete functional recovery but partial deformitya

22 (11)

5 (7)

10 (16)

6 (12)

1 (7)

Partial recovery with gross functional defect    and deformity

31 (16)

7 (10)

13 (20)

10 (20)

1 (7)

No significant improvement 

40 (20)

-

1 (1.5)

27 (54)

12 (86)

aSatisfactory recovery

bGrade 1, C5, 6, 7 improvement; Grade 2, C5, 6, 7 improvement; Grade 3, panpalsy C5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Grade 4, panpalsy with Hornon’s syndrome.

Narakas classification

Total

200 (100%)

Grade-1

72 (36%)

Grade-2

64 (32%)

Grade-3

50 (25%)

Grade-4

14 (7%)

Complete recoverya

107 (54)

60 (83)

40 (63)

7 (14)

-

Near complete functional recovery but partial deformitya

22 (11)

5 (7)

10 (16)

6 (12)

1 (7)

Partial recovery with gross functional defect    and deformity

31 (16)

7 (10)

13 (20)

10 (20)

1 (7)

No significant improvement 

40 (20)

-

1 (1.5)

27 (54)

12 (86)

aSatisfactory recovery

bGrade 1, C5, 6, 7 improvement; Grade 2, C5, 6, 7 improvement; Grade 3, panpalsy C5, 6, 7,8,9, Grade 4, panpalsy with Hornon’s syndrome.

Variables in probe trial day

Groups

NC

SC

ColC

Pre-SwE Exp

Post-SwE Exp

Target crossings

8.0 (0.3)

7.3 (0.3) 

1.7 (0.2)a

6.0 (0.3)a

5.8 (0.4)a

Time spent in target

18.0 (0.4) 

16.2 (0.7) 

5.8 (0.8)a

15.3 (0.7)a

15.2 (0.9)a

NC indicates normal control; SC, Sham control; ColC, colchicine control; SwE, swimming exercise exposure.

aP <0.01.

Pain level

Number (%)

P

Pre

Post 1

Post 2

Mean (SD)a pain score

4.7 (1.9)

2.7 (1.6)

0.8 (1.1)

<0.001

Pain categories

    

   No pain (0)

-

(1.7)

31 (51.7)

<0.001

   Mild pain (1-3)

15 (25.0)

43 (70.0)

27 (45.0)

 

   Moderete pain (4-6)

37 (61.7)

15 (25.0)

2 (3.3)

 

   Severe pain (7-10)

8 (13.3)

2 (3.3)

-

 

aPain scores according to the visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10; SD indicates standard deviation

Surgeries

Number  

(%)

Satisfactory outcomes n (%)

Primary surgery (n=24)

 

 

Upper plexus

6 (25)

5 (83)

Pan-palsy

18 (75)

6 (33)

All

24 (100)

11 (46)

Secondary Surgery (n=26)

 

 

Shoulder deformity

15 (58)

13 (87)

Wrist and forearm deformity

11 (42)

6 (54)

All

26 (100)

19 (73)

Primary and secondary surgery

50 (100)

30 (60)

Mallet score 14 to 25 or Raimondi score 2-3 or Medical Research grading >3 to 5.

Narakas classification

Total

200 (100%)

Grade-1

72 (36%)

Grade-2

64 (32%)

Grade-3

50 (25%)

Grade-4

14 (7%)

Complete recoverya

107 (54)

60 (83)

40 (63)

7 (14)

-

Near complete functional recovery but partial deformitya

22 (11)

5 (7)

10 (16)

6 (12)

1 (7)

Partial recovery with gross functional defect    and deformity

31 (16)

7 (10)

13 (20)

10 (20)

1 (7)

No significant improvement 

40 (20)

-

1 (1.5)

27 (54)

12 (86)

aSatisfactory recovery

bGrade 1, C5, 6, 7 improvement; Grade 2, C5, 6, 7 improvement; Grade 3, panpalsy C5, 6, 7,8,9, Grade 4, panpalsy with Hornon’s syndrome.

Trials

Groups

NC

SC

ColC

Pre-SwE Exp

Post-SwE Exp

1

20.8 (0.6)

22.1 (1.8)

41.1 (1.3)b

31.9 (1.9)b

32.9 (1.8)a, b

2

10.9 (0.6)

14.9 (1.7)

37.4 (1.1)b

24.9 (2.0)b

26.8 (2.5)b

3

8.4 (0.5)

9.9 (2.0)

32.8 (1.2)b

22.0 (1.4)b

21.0 (1.4)b

4

7.8 (0.5)

10.4 (1.3)

27.6(1.1)b

12.8 (1.2)b

13.0 (1.4)b

Savings (%)c

47.7 (3.0)

33.0 (3.0)

10.0 (0.9)b

23.6 (2.7)b

18.9 (5.3)b

NC indicates normal control; SC, Sham control; ColC, colchicine control; SwE, swimming exercise exposure.

aP <0.05; bP <0.01.

cThe difference in latency scores between trials 1 and 2, expressed as the percentage of savings increased from trial 1 to trial 2

Physiological vulnerabilities

Many PwD have underlying health conditions, including cardiopulmonary disease, reduced mobility, and impaired thermoregulation, that make them more susceptible to heat stress, respiratory complications, or infection.

Physical susceptibility

Many PwD have some form of limitation in mobility, sensory, or cognitive function that can restrict timely evacuation and emergency services access. Further, those who rely on assistive technologies (e.g., powered wheelchairs, ventilators) are particularly vulnerable during power outages or disruptions to essential services.

Barriers to healthcare access

During climate-related emergencies and other disasters, PwD often face difficulties in accessing medications, support and essential health services, including rehabilitation. A lack of disability-inclusive disaster planning frequently leaves them without appropriate evacuation, shelter, communication, or recovery services.

Socioeconomic disadvantage

Many PwD already encounter social and economic disadvantages, including poverty, unemployment, poor housing, and social exclusion, which increase climate vulnerability and reduce adaptive capacity. Further, these factors also limit their ability to recover from displacement, loss of assets, or disruption of social safety nets.

Disruption of support systems

Climate-related displacement, infrastructure collapse, or emergency responses may interrupt vital caregiving and assistive services, or community-based services, leaving individuals isolated and at risk.

Communication barriers

Individuals with sensory, cognitive, or intellectual disabilities may not receive accessible and timely information during emergencies, further hindering their ability to respond and seek help.

Understanding and addressing the unique needs of PwD is essential for building health systems that are resilient, equitable, and capable of protecting all members of society, especially in the face of climate change and other escalating disasters [5].

 Lesion-size

Histopathology report

Total

CIN1

CIN2

CIN3

ICC

CC

SM

0–5 mm

73

0

0

0

5

5

83

6–15 mm

119

18

1

4

0

0

142

>15 mm

1

8

31

23

12

0

75

Total

193

26

32

27

17

5

300

CIN indicates cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; ICC, invasive cervical cancer; CC, chronic cervicitis; SM, squamous metaplasia

 

Histopathology report

Total

CIN1

CIN2

CIN3

ICC

CC

SM

Lesion -Size

0-5  mm

73

0

0

0

5

5

83

6-15  mm

119

18

1

4

0

0

142

>15  mm

1

8

31

23

12

0

75

Total

193

26

32

27

17

5

300

CIN indicates Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; ICC, Invasive cervical cancer; CC, Chronic cervicitis; SM, Squamous metaplasia

Group

Didactic posttest marks (%)

Flipped posttest marks (%)

Difference in marks (mean improvement)

P

<50%

63.2 (9.4)

82.2 (10.8)

19.0

<0.001

≥50%

72.4 (14.9)

84.2 ( 10.3)

11.8

<0.001

Data presented as mean (standard deviation)

 Role of PRM professionals

PRM professionals play a crucial role in addressing the functional, psychological, and social needs of people, including PwD [22]. They are uniquely positioned to address the intersection of disability and climate change, as their expertise spans from management of functional impairments, chronic conditions, and post-injury rehabilitation, to disability advocacy/education, areas that are highly sensitive to environmental stressors [723]. As the climate crisis intensifies, their role becomes increasingly critical in managing the direct health impacts and advocating for inclusive, resilient health systems that support the most vulnerable population. The importance of integrating rehabilitation into all phases of emergency preparedness and response has been increasingly recognized by global health authorities [22]. PRM professionals play a critical role across this disaster care continuum and require a diverse skill set that spans diagnostic acumen, clinical management, education, systems coordination, and policy advocacy. Their involvement is particularly vital in the context of climate-related disasters, where the burden of injury, disability, and chronic health conditions is often compounded by disrupted services and infrastructure [24]. The complexity of these scenarios demands that PRM personnel be equipped to contribute effectively across all stages of the disaster management cycle, from preparedness and mitigation to response and recovery [2224]. Some of the key roles for PRM professionals in climate crisis management may include:

Clinical care and functional restoration

PRM specialists are trained to manage chronic disease complications, musculoskeletal injuries, neurodegenerative conditions, and functional impairments, which are either caused or worsened by climate-related factors. Their knowledge of how environmental factors impact function is essential in planning safe, individualized care plans that consider temperature, air quality, mobility, and fatigue. etc. Further, they can provide psychological support to help PwD manage stress, anxiety, and trauma related to climate events, displacement, or loss of social support.

Emergency and post-disaster rehabilitation

PRM teams have a crucial role in acute injury management (e.g., spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injury, limb amputations, etc.), and in coordinating the care continuum, long-term post-disaster [2225]. They ensure that the victims receive timely interventions to prevent complications and facilitate successful community reintegration.

Enhance adaptive capacity and resilience

PRM teams can be key in the development of a structured system that improves the ability of PwD to adapt to and recover from climate catastrophes. This includes designing rehabilitation plans adapted to environmental constraints (e.g., safe exercise in heat-sensitive populations, dehydration, outdoor air quality), preparing individualized emergency preparedness plans, continuity of care for ongoing rehabilitation and medication needs, and collaborating across disciplines and systems to ensure accessibility and service continuity.

Education and advocacy

A growing number of PRM professionals recognize the importance of environmental health [23]. PRM professionals can lead in educating health workers, policymakers, and communities about the impact of climate change on disability and function, and the development of climate-resilient and sustainable healthcare systems. Further, their role is particularly essential in educating patients and caregivers on managing health in extreme conditions.

Leadership in global health and policy

Organizations like the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM) have taken steps to elevate PRM’s role in disaster and climate-health initiatives. The ISPRM Position Statement on Climate Change and Disability advocates for inclusive governance, data-driven strategies, and partnership with PwD and civil society [24]. It calls for a multisectoral collaboration to ensure that rehabilitation is integrated into broader climate adaptation and health system planning, maximizing resources and impact. It calls all stakeholders for: raising awareness, strengthening health systems’ adaptive capacity, involving PwD in planning and decision-making, and conducting research on climate-related functional impairments and rehabilitation outcomes [724].

 The way forward

There is a growing call from global agencies, including the UN, WHO, and disability rights organizations, to adopt disability-inclusive climate action that acknowledges and addresses the specific vulnerabilities and needs of PwD. However, disability inclusion is often absent from mainstream climate adaptation and mitigation policies. To address the escalating risks posed by climate change, the following strategic actions are needed:

Inclusive governance

Disability must be mainstreamed in climate and disaster policy frameworks, including Nationally Determined Contributions. National adaptation and mitigation strategies must explicitly recognize and incorporate the needs of PwD, ensuring accessibility of early warning systems, evacuation protocols, and disaster shelters. Further, PwD and their representative organizations need to be involved in designing policies and action plans.

Resilient rehabilitation systems

Investment in climate-proof infrastructure, mobile service delivery, and backup systems is essential. Rehabilitation services must evolve to meet climate challenges, which include the use of tele-rehabilitation, artificial intelligence technologies, mobile units, climate-informed infrastructure planning, etc. Services should remain functional and accessible during disruptions.

Workforce education

Training programs in medical schools and continuing education should include climate-related health risks, disability-inclusive planning, and sustainable healthcare. The healthcare workforce education programs should be focused on climate adaptation, sustainability, and rehabilitation planning. Interdisciplinary collaboration across public health, climate science, and disability sectors should be promoted.

Research and evidence

There is a paucity of data on how climate change affects functional outcomes, rehabilitation access, and long-term recovery. More studies are needed on the functional outcomes of climate-related illness and injury, rehabilitation accessibility during emergencies, and long-term community reintegration. There is a need for the development of climate-disability vulnerability indices to inform health planning and support participatory research involving PwD, especially from low-resource and climate-exposed regions.

Global partnerships

Multisectoral collaboration among UN agencies, governments, non-government organisations, academia, and disability-related organizations is vital to implement comprehensive, equity-focused responses. Global agencies such as the WHO, United Nations Development Programme, and ISPRM have an essential role in setting standards and mobilizing actions and advocacy.

Conclusion

Climate change poses a significant and growing threat to global health, with widespread consequences to vulnerable populations, including PwD. A structured, people-centered approach is essential for building climate-resilient rehabilitation systems to ensure that the unique needs of PwD are met, to reduce health disparities, safeguard rights, and empower individuals and communities. The road ahead requires coordinated, evidence-informed, and equity-driven action. As the climate crisis escalates, integrating rehabilitation into national and global climate health responses becomes not just relevant but essential. The time to act is now, for proactive, inclusive, and interdisciplinary collaboration to help build a safer, more inclusive, and sustainable future for all in this era of climate uncertainty.

Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, for its continued support.
Author contributions
Concept and design, or design of the research; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: BA, FK. Drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content: BA, FK. Final approval of the version to be published: BA, FK. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: BA, FK.
Conflict of interest
This article draws on the authors’ previously published work: Amatya B, Khan F. Climate change and disability: A physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) perspective. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med 2023;6:5–9. The views expressed are solely those of the authors. The authors declare no additional conflicts of interest.
Data availability statement
We confirm that the data supporting the findings of the study will be shared upon reasonable request.
Supplementary file
None
    References
    1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Annex B. Glossary of Terms. Available at: https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=689 (Access on 14 Dec 2025)
    2. World Health Organisation. Climate change and health Fact Sheet Geneva: WHO; 30 October 2021 [Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health. (Access on 11 Dec 2025)
    3. Romanello M, McGushin A, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Hughes N, Jamart L, Kennard H, Lampard P, Solano Rodriguez B, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Cai W, Campbell-Lendrum D, Capstick S, Chambers J, Chu L, Ciampi L, Dalin C, Dasandi N, Dasgupta S, Davies M, Dominguez-Salas P, Dubrow R, Ebi KL, Eckelman M, Ekins P, Escobar LE, Georgeson L, Grace D, Graham H, Gunther SH, Hartinger S, He K, Heaviside C, Hess J, Hsu SC, Jankin S, Jimenez MP, Kelman I, Kiesewetter G, Kinney PL, Kjellstrom T, Kniveton D, Lee JKW, Lemke B, Liu Y, Liu Z, Lott M, Lowe R, Martinez-Urtaza J, Maslin M, McAllister L, McMichael C, Mi Z, Milner J, Minor K, Mohajeri N, Moradi-Lakeh M, Morrissey K, Munzert S, Murray KA, Neville T, Nilsson M, Obradovich N, Sewe MO, Oreszczyn T, Otto M, Owfi F, Pearman O, Pencheon D, Rabbaniha M, Robinson E, Rocklöv J, Salas RN, Semenza JC, Sherman J, Shi L, Springmann M, Tabatabaei M, Taylor J, Trinanes J, Shumake-Guillemot J, Vu B, Wagner F, Wilkinson P, Winning M, Yglesias M, Zhang S, Gong P, Montgomery H, Costello A, Hamilton I. The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future. Lancet. 2021 Oct 30;398(10311):1619-1662. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01787-6. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01787-6
    4. Romanello M, Walawender M, Hsu SC, Moskeland A, Palmeiro-Silva Y, Scamman D, Smallcombe JW, Abdullah S, Ades M, Al-Maruf A, Ameli N, Angelova D, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Ballester J, Basagaña X, Bechara H, Beggs PJ, Cai W, Campbell-Lendrum D, Charnley GEC, Courtenay O, Cross TJ, Dalin C, Dasandi N, Dasgupta S, Davies M, Eckelman M, Freyberg C, Corral PG, Gasparyan O, Giguere J, Gordon-Strachan G, Gumy S, Gunther SH, Hamilton I, Hang Y, Hänninen R, Hartinger S, He K, Heidecke J, Hess JJ, Jankin S, Jay O, Pantera DK, Kelman I, Kennard H, Kiesewetter G, Kinney P, Kniveton D, Koubi V, Kouznetsov R, Lampard P, Lee JKW, Lemke B, Li B, Linke A, Liu Y, Liu Z, Lowe R, Ma S, Mabhaudhi T, Maia C, Markandya A, Martin G, Martinez-Urtaza J, Maslin M, McAllister L, McMichael C, Mi Z, Milner J, Minor K, Minx J, Mohajeri N, Momen NC, Moradi-Lakeh M, Morrisey K, Munzert S, Murray KA, Obradovich N, Orgen P, Otto M, Owfi F, Pearman OL, Pega F, Pershing AJ, Pinho-Gomes AC, Ponmattam J, Rabbaniha M, Repke T, Roa J, Robinson E, Rocklöv J, Rojas-Rueda D, Ruiz-Cabrejos J, Rusticucci M, Salas RN, Plana ASJ, Semenza JC, Sherman JD, Shumake-Guillemot J, Singh P, Sjödin H, Smith MR, Sofiev M, Sorensen C, Springmann M, Stowell JD, Tabatabaei M, Tartarini F, Taylor J, Tonne C, Treskova M, Trinanes JA, Uppstu A, Valdes-Ortega N, Wagner F, Watts N, Whitcombe H, Wood R, Yang P, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Zhang C, Zhang S, Zhu Q, Gong P, Montgomery H, Costello A. The 2025 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: climate change action offers a lifeline. Lancet. 2025 Dec 13;406(10521):2804-2857. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01919-1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01919-1
    5. United Nations Human Rights Office. Analytical study on the promotion and protection of the rights of persons with disabilities in the context of climate change (A/HRC/47/25). Geneva: United Nations; 2021. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/reports/ahrc4746-analytical-study-promotion-and-protection-rights-older-persons-context. (Accessed on 13 Dec 2025)
    6. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Analytical study on the promotion and protection of the rights of older persons in the context of climate change. New York, USA: UN; 2021. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3927180?ln=es&v=pdf. (Accessed on 13 Dec 2025)
    7. Amatya B, Khan F. Climate change and disability: A physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) perspective J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;6:5-9. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/ph9.0000000000000003
    8. Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Bouley T, Boykoff M, Byass P, Cai W, Campbell-Lendrum D, Chambers J, Cox PM, Daly M, Dasandi N, Davies M, Depledge M, Depoux A, Dominguez-Salas P, Drummond P, Ekins P, Flahault A, Frumkin H, Georgeson L, Ghanei M, Grace D, Graham H, Grojsman R, Haines A, Hamilton I, Hartinger S, Johnson A, Kelman I, Kiesewetter G, Kniveton D, Liang L, Lott M, Lowe R, Mace G, Odhiambo Sewe M, Maslin M, Mikhaylov S, Milner J, Latifi AM, Moradi-Lakeh M, Morrissey K, Murray K, Neville T, Nilsson M, Oreszczyn T, Owfi F, Pencheon D, Pye S, Rabbaniha M, Robinson E, Rocklöv J, Schütte S, Shumake-Guillemot J, Steinbach R, Tabatabaei M, Wheeler N, Wilkinson P, Gong P, Montgomery H, Costello A. The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):581-630. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9. Epub 2017 Oct 30. Erratum in: Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):540. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9
    9. Bunker A, Wildenhain J, Vandenbergh A, Henschke N, Rocklov J, Hajat S, Sauerborn R. Effects of Air temperature on climate-sensitive mortality and morbidity outcomes in the elderly; a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence. EBioMedicine. 2016;6:258-68. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.034
    10. Levy K, Woster AP, Goldstein RS, Carlton EJ. Untangling the Impacts of climate change on waterborne diseases: a systematic review of relationships between diarrheal diseases and temperature, rainfall, flooding, and drought. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(10):4905-22. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06186
    11. Myers SS, Smith MR, Guth S, Golden CD, Vaitla B, Mueller ND, Dangour AD, Huybers P. Climate Change and Global Food Systems: potential impacts on food security and undernutrition. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:259-77. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044356
    12. World Health Organisation. Vector-borne diseases. Geneva: WHO.; Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases. (Accessed on 11 Dec 2025)
    13. World Health Organization. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health. (Accessed on 11 Dec 2025)
    14. Hayes K, Poland B. Addressing Mental Health in a Changing Climate: Incorporating Mental Health Indicators into Climate Change and Health Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(9). doi:  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091806
    15. Khan F, Amatya B. Management of fatigue in neurological disorders: Implications for rehabilitation. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;1:9-36. doi:  https://doi.org/10.4103/ijprm.ijprm_5_18
    16. Hayes K, Blashki G, Wiseman J, Burke S, Reifels L. Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts and priority actions. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018;12:28. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6
    17. World Health Organisation. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities Geneva: WHO; 2022 [Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063600. (Accessed on 11 Dec 2025)
    18. Lindsay S, Hsu S, Ragunathan S, Lindsay J. The impact of climate change related extreme weather events on people with pre-existing disabilities and chronic conditions: a scoping review. Disability and rehabilitation. 2022:1-21. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2150328
    19. Gaskin CJ, Taylor D, Kinnear S, Mann J, Hillman W, Moran M. Factors associated with the climate change vulnerability and the adaptive capacity of people with disability: a systematic review. Weather Climate Society. 2017;9(4):801-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0126.1
    20. Bongioanni P, Del Carratore R, Corbianco S, Diana A, Cavallini G, Masciandaro SM, Dini M, Buizza R. Climate change and neurodegenerative diseases. Environ Res. 2021;201:111511. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111511
    21. Alexander M. Pandemics, climate change, and disability related to SCI. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020;6(1):36. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-0285-6
    22. Amatya B, Khan F. Disaster Response and Management: The Integral Role of Rehabilitation. Ann Rehabil Med. 2023;47(4):237-260. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.23071
    23. Alexander M, Alexander J, Arora M, Slocum C, Middleton J. A bellweather for climate change and disability: educational needs of rehabilitation professionals regarding disaster management and spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019;5:94. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-019-0239-z
    24. Alexander M, Gosney J, O'Conell C, Khan F, Lains J. International Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ISPRM) Position Statement on Climate Change and Disability. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;6(2):27-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ph9.0000000000000001
    25. Amatya B, Galea M, Li J, Khan F. Medical rehabilitation in disaster relief: towards a new perspective. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(8):620-628. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2250