Sociodemographic and neurological profile of patients with spinal cord injury in a trauma hospital in Bangladesh

Authors

DOI:

Keywords

spinal cord injuries, socio-demographic factors, falls, rehabilitation

Correspondence

Md Mohiuddin
Email: mohicmc44@gmail.com

Publication history

Received: 23 Oct 2025
Accepted: 28 Dec 2025
Published online: 30 Dec 2025

Responsible editor

Reviewers

D: Anonymous

Funding

None

Ethical approval

Approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation (Memo: 1791, Dated 23 May 2022).

Trial registration number

Not available

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2025; all rights reserved. 
Published by Bangladesh Medical University (former Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University)
Key messages
Traumatic spinal cord injury in Bangladesh predominantly affects young rural males, often due to preventable falls from trees. Lumbar injuries and paraplegia are most common, with over one-third presenting complete neurological deficits. These findings underscore the need for early neurological assessment, targeted prevention strategies, and improved rehabilitation services, particularly in underserved rural communities.
Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a severe public health problem associated with long-term motor, sensory, and autonomic impairments, resulting in substantial physical, psychological, and socio-economic consequences for affected individuals and health systems [1, 2]. The global incidence of TSCI ranges from 15 to 40 cases per million population annually, with clear disparities between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [3]. Although improved safety measures have contributed to stable or declining trends in many developed settings, the burden of TSCI continues to increase in LMICs due to rapid urbanisation, expanding road traffic, inadequate enforcement of safety regulations, and persistent occupational hazards [4, 5].

In South Asia, including Bangladesh, reliable epidemiological data on TSCI remain limited because of under-reporting and weak health information systems. Available evidence suggests that falls and road traffic accidents are the leading causes of injury. Individuals with TSCI frequently experience long-term complications that necessitate prolonged and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. However, access to specialized rehabilitation services in resource-constrained settings is often insufficient, exacerbating disability, loss of productivity, and socioeconomic vulnerability for patients and their families.

Neurological classification is fundamental for assessing injury severity and guiding clinical management. Comprehensive data on the socio-demographic and neurological characteristics of TSCI patients in Bangladesh are scarce, particularly for injuries related to rural and occupational exposures. This lack of context-specific evidence limits the development of targeted prevention strategies and the effective allocation of healthcare resources. To address this gap, the present study aims to investigate the socio-demographic and neurological profiles of patients with TSCI admitted through the emergency department of a specialised hospital.

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Institute of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Dhaka, the largest tertiary-level referral centre for trauma and rehabilitation in Bangladesh. Adult patients (aged = 18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of TSCI admitted between June 2022 and November 2023 were included. Diagnosis was established through clinical evaluation and radiological investigations. Patients with non-traumatic spinal cord conditions, pre-existing neurological deficits that could confound assessment, or those who died before complete evaluation were excluded. A convenience sampling strategy was applied, enrolling all eligible patients admitted during the study period.

Patients were initially identified from hospital records and subsequently screened in the inpatient departments based on predefined eligibility criteria. After obtaining written informed consent, data were collected using a structured case record form by trained postgraduate residents in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Information was gathered through patient interviews, caregiver reports when required, clinical examinations, and review of medical records. Collected data included socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, residence, and occupation), mechanism and level of injury, associated injuries, and time since injury.

Neurological assessment was performed within 24 hours of admission using the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, and injury severity was graded according to the Asia Impairment Scale. Participant confidentiality and anonymity were strictly maintained throughout the research process.

Data were analysed using SPSS statistics software. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations, were used to summarize sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, while neurological profiles were presented by injury level and Impairment Scale grades.

Sociodemographic factors

A total of 182 patients with TSCI were analysed. Majority (63.7%) of them were examined within three days of the injury. The mean (standard deviation) of age was 38.0 (14.6) years; most patients were male (93%) and from rural areas (90%). One-third (32%) of them were farmers and one-fourth (24.7%) had no formal education. Fifteen per cent of them had injuries other than spinal injuries.

Clinical profile

Paraplegia was the most common clinical presentation (87%), with 37% unable to move their lower limbs at admission (Table 1). Bladder catheterisation was required in 64.8% of patients. The lumbar spine was most frequently affected (50%), followed by the thoracic spine (26%). Moderate to severe pain was reported by 91% of patients. Falls from height were the leading cause of injury (67%), particularlyf falls from trees (43%), while road traffic accidents accounted for 14.2%. According to the Impairment Scale, 36.2% had complete spinal cord injury (Grade A).

This study highlights the substantial burden of TSCI in Bangladesh, disproportionately affecting young males from rural areas who are engaged in physically demanding, low-income occupations. Falls from trees emerged as the leading cause of injury, reflecting a context-specific occupational hazard within rural agrarian communities and aligning with findings from regional studies that emphasize the need for locally tailored prevention strategies [6]. The predominance of male patients and rural residents is consistent with evidence from other LMICs, where TSCI commonly affects individuals involved in high-risk manual labour such as farming and day labour [7]. Low household income and limited educational attainment further underscore the socioeconomic vulnerabilities that may hinder timely care, access to rehabilitation, and social reintegration.

Categories

Number (%)

Sex

 

   Male

36 (60.0)

   Female

24 (40.0)

Age in yearsa

8.8 (4.2)

   Education

 

   Pre-school

20 (33.3)

   Elementary school

24 (40.0)

   Junior high school

16 (26.7)

Cancer diagnoses

 

   Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

33 (55)

   Retinoblastoma

5 (8.3)

   Acute myeloid leukemia

4 (6.7)

   Non-Hodgkins lymphoma

4 (6.7)

   Osteosarcoma

3 (5)

   Hepatoblastoma

2 (3.3)

   Lymphoma

2 (3.3)

   Neuroblastoma

2 (3.3)

   Medulloblastoma

1 (1.7)

   Neurofibroma

1 (1.7)

   Ovarian tumour

1 (1.7)

   Pancreatic cancer

1 (1.7)

   Rhabdomyosarcoma

1 (1.7)

aMean (standard deviation)

Categories

Number (%)

Sex

 

   Male

36 (60.0)

   Female

24 (40.0)

Age in yearsa

8.8 (4.2)

Education

 

   Pre-school

20 (33.3)

   Elementary school

24 (40.0)

   Junior high school

16 (26.7)

Cancer diagnoses

 

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

33 (55)

Retinoblastoma

5 (8.3)

Acute myeloid leukemia

4 (6.7)

Non-Hodgkins lymphoma

4 (6.7)

Osteosarcoma

3 (5)

Hepatoblastoma

2 (3.3)

Lymphoma

2 (3.3)

Neuroblastoma

2 (3.3)

Medulloblastoma

1 (1.7)

Neurofibroma

1 (1.7)

Ovarian tumour

1 (1.7)

Pancreatic cancer

1 (1.7)

Rhabdomyosarcoma

1 (1.7)

aMean (standard deviation)

Table 1 Clinical presentation and cause of spinal cord injuries (n=182)

Topic

Teaching method

Pre-test score

Post-test score

Difference (post minus pre-test scores)

P

 

Cerebellar disorder 

Traditional teaching

1.2 (0.9)

2.8 (1.0)

1.6

<0.001

ECE

1.2 (0.9)

6.4 (1.4)

5.2

<0.001

Parkinson's disease 

Traditional teaching

1.2 (0.9)

1.9 (0.7)

0.7

<0.001

ECE

1.2 (0.9)

6.0 (1.3)

4.8

<0.001

ECE indicates early clinical exposure. All values expressed as mean (standard deviation)

Topic

Teaching method

Pre-test score

Post-test score

Difference between post and pre-test score

P

(Post vs pre)

Cerebellar Disorder

 

Traditional Teaching

1.2 (0.9)

2.8 (1.0)

-1.6

<0.001

ECE

1.2 (0.9)

6.4 (1.4)

-5.2

<0.001

Parkinson's Disease

 

Traditional Teaching

1.2 (0.9)

1.9 (0.7)

-0.7

<0.001

ECE

1.2 (0.9)

6.0 (1.3)

-4.8

<0.001

ECE indicates Early clinical exposure. All values expressed as mean (standard deviation)

Variables

Results

Number (%)

Sex

Male

29 (48.0)

Female

31 (52.0)

Symptoms 

 

Dyspnea

56 (93.3)

Chest pain

55 (91.7)

Fatigue

55 (91.7)

Leg oedema

47 (78.3)

Palpitation

49 (81.6)

Cough

27 (45.0)

Hoarseness of voice

3 (5.0)

Hemoptysis

5 (8.3)

Syncope

3 (5.0)

Cyanosis

3 (5.0)

Severity of pulmonary hypertension  

Mild

28 (46.7)

Moderate

22 (36.7)

Severe

10 (16.7)

Types of pulmonary hypertension

Type 1

19 (31.6)

Type 2

27 (45.0)

Type 3

7 (11.7)

Type 4

3 (5.0)

Type 5

4 (6.7)

Mean (SD)

Age (years)

49.6 (14.6)

RVSP (mmHg) by severity of pulmonary hypertension    

Mild

43 (7.0)

Moderate

58 (5.0)

Severe

80 (7:0)

mPAP (mmHg) of type of pulmonary hypertension   

Type 1

54 (28.9)

Type 2

46 (7.6)

Type 3

47.4 (11.0)

Type 4

53 (2.0)

Type 5

49.5 (16.2)

SD indicates standard deviation; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure. RVSP 36–49 mmHg is mild, 50 –69 mmHg is moderate, and ≥70 mmHg is severe pulmonary hypertension. Types of pulmonary hypertension are based on etiology as per reference.

Category

Key Factors

Weight

Strengths

Strong management support, skilled workforce, compliance with legal regulations

0.338

Weaknesses

Logistical complexity, inadequate segregation, financial constraints

0.13

Opportunities

Industry collaboration, environmental policies, new technology

0.094

Threats

Limited space, lack of coordination, high investment risk

0.329

Pain level

Number (%)

P

Pre

Post 1

Post 2

Mean (SD)a pain score

4.7 (1.9)

2.7 (1.6)

0.8 (1.1)

<0.001

Pain categories

    

   No pain (0)

-

(1.7)

31 (51.7)

<0.001

   Mild pain (1-3)

15 (25.0)

43 (70.0)

27 (45.0)

 

   Moderete pain (4-6)

37 (61.7)

15 (25.0)

2 (3.3)

 

   Severe pain (7-10)

8 (13.3)

2 (3.3)

-

 

aPain scores according to the visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10; SD indicates standard deviation

Variable

Number (%)

Clinical presentation

 

Unable to move lower limb

67 (36.8)

Unable to move all four limbs

16 (8.2)

Muscle weakness in lower limb

79 (43.4)

Muscle weakness in all four limbs

13 (7.1)

Bladder - catheter in situ

118 (64.8)

Bladder - incontinence

24 (13.2)

Bowel - not passed yet

66 (36.3)

Breathing difficulty

26 (14.3)

Swelling in affected part

91 (50.0)

Difficulty in standing/sitting

87 (47.8)

Vital signs and clinical signs

 

Tachycardia

25 (13.7)

Hypertension

17 (9.3)

Tachypnea

30 (16.5)

Absent bowel sound

23 (12.6)

Sensory involvement present

118 (64.8)

Motor involvement present

120 (65.9)

Decreased muscle tone

83 (45.6)

Radiological injury type

 

Compression

115 (63.2)

Translation

49 (26.9)

Mixed pattern

18 (9.9)

Region of injury

 

Lumbar

91 (50.0)

Thoracic

48 (26.4)

Cervical

30 (16.5)

Combined (thoracolumbar, cervicothoracic)

13 (7.1)

Clinical Status

 

Paraplegia

158 (86.8)

Tetraplegia

24 (13.2)

Pain Severity

 

Severe (Visual Analogue Scale  = 7)

105 (57.7)

Moderate (Visual Analogue Scale 4–6)

60 (33.0)

Mild (VAS 1–3)

17 (9.3)

Autonomic Dysreflexia

4 (2.2)

Cause of injury

 

Fall from height

121 (66.5)

Fall from tree

78 (64.5)

Fall from rooftop

43 (35.5)

Fall of heavy object

30 (16.4)

Road traffic accident

26 (14.2)

Other (workplace, bull attack, etc.)

5 (2.7)

Spinal region of injury

 

Lumbar

91 (50.0)

Thoracic

48 (26.4)

Cervical

30 (16.5)

Others (thoracolumbar, etc.)

13 (7.1)

Clinical status

 

Paraplegia

158 (86.8)

Tetraplegia

24 (13.2)

Type of bony injury

 

Compression

115 (63.2)

Translation

49 (26.9)

Others (destruction/facet)

18 (9.9)

Falls from height, particularly tree-related falls, accounted for over two-thirds of injuries, while road traffic accidents contributed a smaller proportion. This pattern contrasts with high-income countries, where road traffic accidents are often the primary cause, but are consistent with LMIC settings where occupational and environmental risks play a dominant role [8]. These findings support the need for targeted public health interventions, including safety education, use of protective equipment, and community-based injury prevention initiatives.

The lumbar spine was the most frequently affected region, differing from injury patterns reported in many high-income countries and reflecting variability in trauma mechanisms across regions. Similar regional variation has been reported in neighboring South Asian countries [9]. Although most patients presented within three days of injury, delays among a substantial proportion indicate gaps in pre-hospital care, emergency transport, and public awareness.

Neurologically, more than one-third of patients sustained complete spinal cord injuries, while the majority had incomplete injuries, suggesting potential for functional recovery with timely rehabilitation. This pattern is consistent with reports from Bangladesh and comparable LMICs [10, 11]. High levels of pain, bladder dysfunction, and paraplegia highlight the need for comprehensive, multidisciplinary management. Study limitations include recall bias, lack of longitudinal follow-up, and absence of standardised rehabilitation outcome measures.

In conclusion, TSCI in Bangladesh primarily affects socioeconomically deprived rural males and is largely driven by preventable causes such as falls from trees, underscoring the urgent need for culturally appropriate prevention strategies, improved emergency care, and accessible rehabilitation services.

Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the participants of this study. We would like to express our appreciation to the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation.
Author contributions
Conception and design: MM, TU. Acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data: MM, MMI, MIR, TU. Manuscript drafting and revising it critically: MM, MMI, MIR, TU. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: MM, MMI, MIR, TU. Guarantor of accuracy and integrity of the work: TU.
Conflict of interest
We do not have any conflict of interest.
Data availability statement
We confirm that the data supporting the findings of the study will be shared upon reasonable request.
Supplementary file
None
    References
    1. Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, Druschel C, Curt A, Fehlings MG. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Apr 27;3:17018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.18
    2. Derakhshanrad N, Yekaninejad MS, Vosoughi F, Sadeghi Fazel F, Saberi H. Epidemiological study of traumatic spinal cord injuries: experience from a specialized spine center in Iran. Spinal Cord. 2016 Oct;54(10):901–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.10
    3. World Health Organization. Spinal cord injury. 16 April 2024. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury. [Accessed on 23 Oct 2025]
    4. Lu Y, Shang Z, Zhang W, Pang M, Hu X, Dai Y, Shen R, Wu Y, Liu C, Luo T, Wang X, Liu B, Zhang L, Rong L. Global incidence and characteristics of spinal cord injury since 2000-2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2024 Jul 8;22(1):285. . doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03514-9
    5. Jazayeri SB, Maroufi SF, Mohammadi E, Dabbagh Ohadi MA, Hagen EM, Chalangari M, Jazayeri SB, Safdarian M, Zadegan SA, Ghodsi Z, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: A systematic review, data integration, and update. World Neurosurg X. 2023 Feb 1;18:100171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100171
    6. Rupp R, Biering-Sørensen F, Burns SP, Graves DE, Guest J, Jones L, Read MS, Rodriguez GM, Schuld C, Tansey-Md KE, Walden K, Kirshblum S. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Spring;27(2):1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.46292/sci2702-1
    7. PShanthakumar D, Payne A, Leitch T, Alfa-Wali M. Trauma Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Surg J (N Y). 2021 Oct 22;7(4):e281-e285. . doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732351
    8. Ranjbar Hameghavandi MH, Khodadoust E, Hassan Zadeh Tabatabaei MS, Farahbakhsh F, Ghodsi Z, Rostamkhani S, Ghashghaie S, Abbaszade M, Arbabi A, Hossieni SM, Sadeghi-Naini M, Atlasi R, Kankam SB, Vaccaro AR, Guest J, Fehlings M and Rahimi-Movaghar V . Challenges in traumatic spinal cord injury care in developing countries – a scoping review. Front. Public Health. 2024. 12:1377513. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377513
    9. Armstrong JC, Nichols BE, Wilson JM, Cosico RA, Shanks L. Spinal cord injury in the emergency context: review of program outcomes of a spinal cord injury rehabilitation program in Sri Lanka. Confl Health. 2014 Mar 20;8(1):4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-8-4
    10. Uddin T, Islam MT, Hossain M, Hossain MS, Salek AKM, Islam MJ, Haque S, Rahim HR, Hossain MS, Hassanuzzaman M, Islam M, Khan MUH, Ahmed S, Mahmud K, Hasan MR, Tasnim A, Haque MA. Demographic and clinical characteristics of persons with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: Database for the International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey 2023. Neurotrauma Rep. 2023 Sep 6;4(1):598–604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0040
    11. Fernández Londoño LL, Marchesini N, Espejo Ballesteros D, Álzate García L, Gómez Jiménez JA, Ginalis E, Rubiano AM. Epidemiological review of spinal cord injury due to road traffic accidents in Latin America. Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(1):11–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000520112