Comparative Study of “Haemodynamic Changes between Endotracheal Intubations and LMA Insertion”

Authors

  • Md Harun-or-Rashid Department of Anaesthesiology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh
  • ASM Meftahuzzaman Department of Anaesthesiology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh
  • Manirul Islam Department of Anaesthesiology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh
  • AKM Aktaruzzaman Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, BSMMU, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v19i1.4011

Abstract

To compare the haemodynamic changes between LMA insertion & endotracheal intubation, 60 patients were assigned randomly to one of the two groups of thirty each. They were grouped randomly by card sampling. Every patient included in the study was allowed a card preoperatively. According to the card number patients were grouped.

Group A. Airway was maintained by LMA.
Group B: Airway was maintained by ETT.

Haemodynamic parameter i.e. pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and presence of any dysrhythmia were monitored after 1,3,5 & 10 minutes after LMA insertion or ETT intubations. There was statistically significant changes (P<0.05) in pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and (appearance of dysrhythmia in some patients) in group ti patients whereas there was less changes in pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure whose airway was maintained by LMA insertion (Group-A).

We conclude that LMA insertion causes less Haemodynamic changes than that of endotracheal intubation. So LMA insertion is safer than ETT intubations in some selected patients.  

Journal of BSA, Vol. 19, No. 1 & 2, 2006 p.28-32

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
106
PDF
74

Downloads

Published

2009-12-17

How to Cite

Harun-or-Rashid, M., Meftahuzzaman, A., Islam, M., & Aktaruzzaman, A. (2009). Comparative Study of “Haemodynamic Changes between Endotracheal Intubations and LMA Insertion”. Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists, 19(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v19i1.4011

Issue

Vol 19, No 1-2 (2006)

Section

Original Articles