An Empirical Study on Dispute Resolution Methods (DRM) from the Perspective of Employee and Employer: Special Emphasis on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Authors

  • Syed Robayet Ferdous Assistant Professor, Department of Law and Justice, Southeast University, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jbt.v8i1-2.18283

Keywords:

Dispute Resolution Management

Abstract

In recent times, most of the parties involved in dispute resolution process are favoring Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR over the formal adjudication process due to ADRs distinguished benefits. In order to reduce the backlog and pressure of workload, courts randomly select alternative ways to settle dispute. Therefore, a question can be raised how well ADR is working in reality? If a dispute is in existence between a company and an individual, the individual might not get a proper redress against an esteemed company. Moreover, there is a possibility of bias in favor of those who is in the superior positions. Though it was a courageous effort from the legislature and the judiciary to make the dispute resolution system compatible with the changing society, a question remains: how much upshot is there in the legal field? To what extent does the ADR process elude or ensure justice?

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbt.v8i1-2.18283

Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka) Vol.8(1-2) 2013; 1-16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
133
PDF
285

Downloads

Published

2014-03-09

How to Cite

Ferdous, S. R. (2014). An Empirical Study on Dispute Resolution Methods (DRM) from the Perspective of Employee and Employer: Special Emphasis on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka), 8(1-2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbt.v8i1-2.18283

Issue

Section

Articles