Giant Calculus in the Ureteropelvic Junction: A Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/jom.v15i1.19884Keywords:
Urine lithiasis, Urine calculus, Ureteropelvic junction, LithotomyAbstract
Urinary lithiasis is an affection of high social impact associated with high costs. Its incidence varies from 1 to 15% in the general population and has a recurrence chance of 26-50%. We report one rare case of giant ureteral calculus in the ureteropelvic junction in a patient with complaints of left lumbar pain and recurrent urinary tract infection diagnosed in the outpatients Urology clinics. Antibioticotherapy was instituted and complementary tests were done. The abdomen x-ray showed a large opacity in the left kidney topography, and the computed tomography evidenced a giant left ureteral calculus associated with a large ureteropelvic junction dilation and grade III hydronephrosis. An ureterolitothomy was performed and evidenced a calculus of 9.5x6.5cm and weighting 347g. The patient became well after the surgery, and a pyelogram evidenced dilation of both caliceal groups and left ureter, without any calculus. Urinary lithiasis should be early diagnosed and treated in order to avoid severe complications as the presented here.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jom.v15i1.19884
J Medicine 2014; 15: 91-93
Downloads
423
406
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).