Outbreak of Puffer Fish Poisoning in Dhaka City

Authors

  • Mohammad Rafiqul Islam Assistant Professor of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka
  • Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury Junior Consultant of Medicine, Gowain Ghat Upazila Health complex, Sylhet
  • Sudip Kumar Das Honorary Medical Officer, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka
  • Sheikh Md Mahmudur Rahman Honorary Medical Officer, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka
  • Md Robed Amin Associate Professor of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jom.v19i1.34837

Keywords:

Puffer fish, puffer fish poisoning, tetrodotoxin (TTX), neurotoxin, neostigmine

Abstract

Background: Puffer fish poisoning is quite uncommon but not rare in Bangladesh. This is not a very common fish in Bangladesh and consumed predominantly by poor class of people as it is cheap. Puffer fishes are considered toxic because they possess a potent neurotoxin, tetrodotoxin (TTX) and its analogs.

Methods: In October 2014, total 11 patients from two families got admitted in Medicine unit of Dhaka Medical College on the same day with the complaints of tingling, numbness, dizziness, vertigo, postural instability and breathlessness. Both the families admitted, have ingested Puffer fish. A case control study was done where the control were taken from the vicinity with same socioeconomic background. The control group decline of any ingestion of portion of puffer fish. Hence the results and discussion are based on meticulous observation of cases. All the cases were clinically analyzed on different variables.

Results: Total 11 patients were from two families, lives half kilometer apart, from Dholaipar, Jatrabari, Dhaka. Mean age of cases were 25.18. Among eleven cases, 7 were male and 4 were female. Mean of lag period between Puffer fish intake and development symptom was 99.44 minute (SD 97.28). Mean of lag period between development of symptom and hospitalization in puffer fish intake group was 308.57 minute (SD 198.78).There were 4 deaths those didn’t receive Neostigmine and respiratory support. Total 2 patient received Neostigmineand they recovered. Neostigmine is protective in Puffer fish poisoning (RR .889 <1) but the association is not significant (95% CI on both sides of 1).

Conclusion: Cluster of Puffers fish poisoning presenting as outbreaks are associated with serious consequence. The early presentation to health facility and timely neostigmine application and or respiratory support can be lifesaving.

J MEDICINE Jan 2018; 19 (1) : 30-34

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
14
PDF
14

Downloads

Published

2017-12-07

How to Cite

Islam, M. R., Chowdhury, F. R., Das, S. K., Rahman, S. M. M., & Amin, M. R. (2017). Outbreak of Puffer Fish Poisoning in Dhaka City. Journal of Medicine, 19(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.3329/jom.v19i1.34837

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).