Prognostic Factors of Success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy 46 (ESWL) in The Treatment of Renal Stones.

Authors

  • Md Masud Zaman Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Jessore Medical College, Jessore, Bangladesh
  • Md Jamal E Rabby Junior Consultant, Department of Surgery, Shaheed Ziaur Rahman Medical College Hospital (SZMCH), Bogra, Bangladesh
  • Mohammad Ali Junior Consultant, Department of Surgery, Sadar hospital, Brahmanbaria, Bangladesh
  • Md Kabirul Hassan Junior Consultant, Department of Surgery, Gaibandha, Bangladesh
  • Md Mustafizur Rahman Registrar, Department of Surgery, SZMCH, Bogra, Bangladesh
  • ATM Ashaduzzaman Assistant Professor , Department of Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka

Keywords:

Renal stone, ESWL, Prognostic factors.

Abstract

Background: Renal calculi are common approximately 50% of patient between the ages of 30and 50 years. The development of endourological and extracorporeal lithotripsy techniques ledto an increasing number of options for the management of renal calculi.

Objective: To define factors those have a significant impact on the success rate after extracorporealshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stones.

Materials and Methods: Between April 2008 & December 2008, 64 patients with single ormultiple radiopaque renal stones (::s;30mm) were treated with ESWL monotherapy using StortzModulith SLX-F2 lithotriptor.The results of treatment were evaluated after 3 months of followupTreatment success was defined as complete clearance of the stones or presence ofclinically insignificant residual fragments (::s;4mm).The results of treatment were correlated withthe patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index) and stone features (size, site, nature &radio density).

Results: At 3-months follow-up, the overall success rate is 76%. Among them, repeated ESWLsessions are required in 19 patients (53.9%). Post-ESWL complications are recorded in 8patients (12.5%). Using the x2 test, only three factors have a significant impact on the successrate, namely: stone site, size (the largest diameter of the stone), stone number & BMI (BodyMass Index). The success rate is highest for stones located in the upper calyx (15/15; 100%)and lowest for those located in the lower calyx (10/16; 62.5%) (p=.005). Stones with a largestdiameter ot s 15mm are associated with a success rate of 90.2% (37 /41), compared to 52.2%(12/23) for those with a diameter of >15mm (p=.001). The success rate is also higher forsingle stone (46/56; 82%) than multiple stones (3/8; 37.5%) (p=0.005).Patients with lowerBMI (<24) have a better success than higher BMI (>25) (p=0.01)

Conclusion: The success rate of ESWL for the treatment of renal stones can be predicted bystone size, location, number and patient BMI.

Journal of Surgical Sciences (2016) Vol. 20 (2) :46-50

Abstract
209
PDF
235

Downloads

Published

2019-11-07

How to Cite

Prognostic Factors of Success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy 46 (ESWL) in The Treatment of Renal Stones. (2019). Journal of Surgical Sciences, 20(2), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v20i2.43814

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Prognostic Factors of Success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy 46 (ESWL) in The Treatment of Renal Stones. (2019). Journal of Surgical Sciences, 20(2), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v20i2.43814