Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictive Values of Chest Indrawing in the Diagnosis of Severe Pneumonia

Authors

  • SM Abdur Rashid Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Khulna Medical College & Hospital, Khulna
  • Mohammed Kabirul Islam Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Khulna Medical College & Hospital, Khulna
  • Mohammad Showkat Ali Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Khulna Medical College & Hospital, Khulna
  • Mohammed Jamal Uddin Assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, Jahurul Islam Medical College & Hospital, Kishoreganj
  • Farhana Yasmin Junior Consultant, Department of Pediatrics, Khulna Medical College & Hospital, Khulna
  • Muhammad Solaiman Mollah Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College & Hospital, Sylhet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/mediscope.v9i2.61705

Keywords:

Chest indrawing, Pneumonia, Sensitivity, Specificity, Predictive values.

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia is a recognized leading killer disease in under 5 children not only in Bangladesh but also in all developing countries. The presence of lower chest indrawing means that the child has severe pneumonia. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of chest indrawing in the diagnosis of severe pneumonia.

Methods: This analytical study was conducted in the department of pediatrics, Sher-e-Bangla Medical College Hospital, Barisal, from January 2015 to December 2015. A total of 100 cases of severe pneumonia aged from 2 months to 5 years and similar numbers of suitably matched controls who fulfilled inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. A detailed history was taken, a thorough physical examination was done, data were recorded in a preformed questionnaire and were analyzed using a scientific calculator.

Results: Out of 100 cases, 80 (80%) and 100 controls, 72 (72%) were in the age group of 2 months to 1 year. Fast breathing was present in 98 (98%) cases and 88 (88%) controls. Chest indrawing was present in 56 (56%) cases and 42 (42%) controls. Roentgenographically, 44 (44%) cases revealed labor/segmental consolidation, and bilateral patchy consolidation was present in 56 (56%) cases. Among the control group, 28 (28%) patients had hyperlucency of peripheral lung fields in their chest X-rays. In this study, it was found that sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of chest indrawing in the diagnosis of severe pneumonia was 56%, 58%, 57.1% and 56.8% respectively.

Conclusion: Chest indrawing alone is not a highly sensitive tool to predict severe pneumonia but in rural areas where X-ray facilities are not available, chest indrawing may play an important role in identifying children with possible severe pneumonia.

Mediscope 2022;9(2): 54-59

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
2
PDF
2

Downloads

Published

2022-10-10

How to Cite

Rashid, S. A. ., Islam, M. K., Ali, M. S., Uddin, M. J. ., Yasmin, F. ., & Mollah, M. S. . (2022). Sensitivity, Specificity and Predictive Values of Chest Indrawing in the Diagnosis of Severe Pneumonia. Mediscope, 9(2), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.3329/mediscope.v9i2.61705

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 SMA Rashid, MK Islam, MS Ali, MJ Uddin, F Yasmin, MS Mollah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in the Mediscope agree to the following terms that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant Mediscope the right of first publication of the work.

  2. Creative Commons Licence
    Articles in Mediscope are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0. This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.