Problems in the Motivational Basis of Rawls’ Principles of Justice

Authors

  • Kazi ASM Nurul Huda Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/pp.v71i1-2.66519

Keywords:

Aristotelian Principle; Motivation; Primary Goods; Rational Choice; John Rawls; Self-respect; Theory of Justice

Abstract

The paper explores the logical structure of Rawlsian justice principles in order to see whether their justificatory or explanatory conditions are unproblematic. To facilitate this purpose, drawing on readers of Rawls, the author shows that the Aristotelian principle is used to explain the principles of rational choice, particularly the principle of inclusiveness. Then, on the basis of the Aristotelian principle, Rawls justifies his conclusion, via the principles of rational choice and the theory of primary goods. After figuring out the logical structure of justice as fairness, the author deals with the central objective of the paper, where he exposes some problems suffered by the motivational basis of the principles of justice. The foundation on which Rawls grounds his principles of justice is problematic, and consequently, they remain as matters of contention as of today.

Philosophy and Progress, Vol#71-72; No#1-2; Jan-Dec 2022 P 45-60

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
80
PDF
76

Downloads

Published

2023-09-03

How to Cite

Nurul Huda, K. A. . (2023). Problems in the Motivational Basis of Rawls’ Principles of Justice. Philosophy and Progress, 71(1-2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.3329/pp.v71i1-2.66519

Issue

Section

Articles