Acridine orange for diagnosis of malaria – Our experience

Authors

  • Neeta Jangale Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College Miraj, Maharashtra
  • Ashwini Waghmare Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, MRMIS Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/seajph.v6i1.30345

Keywords:

Acridine Orange, Fluorescent Microscopy, Leishman Staining, Malaria, Peripheral Smear

Abstract

Light microscopy of Romanowsky stained peripheral blood smear examination is the age old and commonest method for laboratory diagnosis of malaria. However it is labor intensive, time consuming and requires qualified personnel. So fluorescent microscopy variation that is Quantitative Buffy Coat method( QBC) came into vogue. But QBC imposes cost limitation despite its high performance. Therefore we decided to evaluate fluorescent method using acridine orange in our set up. In this study we have compared Acridine Orange staining with Leishmans staining as gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of acridine orange was 99.28% and 97.19% respectively, while positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predicitive value was 89.93% and 99.82% respectively.

South East Asia Journal of Public Health Vol.6(1) 2016: 49-51

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
30
PDF
25

Author Biography

Neeta Jangale, Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College Miraj, Maharashtra



Downloads

Published

2016-12-10

How to Cite

Jangale, N., & Waghmare, A. (2016). Acridine orange for diagnosis of malaria – Our experience. South East Asia Journal of Public Health, 6(1), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.3329/seajph.v6i1.30345

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Short Communications

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).