Effect of maize-soybean intercropping on soil respiration

Authors

  • Jingjing Cui Tangshan Academy of Agricultural Science, Tangshan, Hebei, 063001, China
  • Quanguo Zhang Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050035, China
  • Lingling Yu Tangshan crop seed station,Tangshan, Hebei, 063001, China
  • Sikander Khan Tanveer SAARC Agriculture Centre , Dhaka-1215, Bangladesh
  • Guiyuan Zhao Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050035, China
  • Qiang Guo Tangshan Academy of Agricultural Science, Tangshan, Hebei, 063001, China 2Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v54i1.80315

Keywords:

Maize-soybean intercropping, Soil CO2 emission rate, Carbon balance

Abstract

Adopting appropriate cropping systems is an effective way to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, meanwhile GHG emission from farmland is a hot topic recently. In recent years, maize–soybean intercropping has been promoted in many regions in China. To explore the effects of maize-soybean intercropping on soil CO2 emission and carbon balance, we established three planting methods, namely, maize monoculture (M), soybean monoculture (S), and maize-soybean intercropping (MS). Results showed that the cumulative emissions of soil CO2 were M (21231 kg·hm-2) > S (19715 kg·hm-2) > MS (17321 kg·hm-2). The two-factor composite model of soil temperature and moisture content could explain the variation in soil CO2 emission rate well, which reached 58.36–68.54%. Correlation analysis showed that the soil CO2 emission rate was significantly correlated with peroxidase activity (P<0.01). The soil carbon balance was favorable under different treatments, serving as a sink for atmospheric carbon. The soil carbon sequestration potential of M and MS treatments was significantly higher than that of S treatment (P<0.05), with increases of 37.11 and 34.02%, respectively. These results indicated that M and MS treatments had strong carbon sequestration potential . M treatment exhibited superior soil carbon balance compared with MS and S treatments, with increases of 29.80 and 359.31%, respectively. Therefore, maize treatment was a better planting method compared with soybean and maize-soybean treatments.

Bangladesh J. Bot. 54(1): 113-122, 2025 (March)

Downloads

Abstract
22
PDF
7

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25

How to Cite

Cui, J., Zhang, Q., Yu, L., Tanveer, S. K., Zhao, G., & Guo, Q. (2025). Effect of maize-soybean intercropping on soil respiration. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 54(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v54i1.80315

Issue

Section

Articles