A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Management of Ectopic Pregnancy and Laparotomy: Experience in Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh: A Prospective Trial

Authors

  • Samsad Jahan BIRDEM Dhaka
  • Tripti Rani Das Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka
  • Samira Humaira Habib BADAS Dhaka
  • Akter Jahan Government Homeopathic College Dhaka
  • Mahjabin Joarder Bangladesh Medical College Dhaka
  • Nurun Nahar Comilla Medical College Comilla
  • Manisha Banarjee Dhaka Medical College Hospital Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bje.v2i1.19570

Keywords:

Ectopic pregnancy, laparoscopic, laparotomy

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficiency and surgical morbidity associated with laparoscopic management of tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) compared with that of open laparotomy.

Materials and methods: During November 2008 to October 2012, there were 89 with a confirmed ectopic pregnancy These patients were admitted through emergency or outpatient department and managed by laparoscopy (number 70) and by laparotomy (number 19). The diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was based on history, clinical symptoms, physical examination, a positive serum B-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG), transvaginal ultrasonography. Patients were informed pre-operatively about the surgical procedures. The main outcome measured included operative time, blood loss, and complications.

Results: Laparoscopic surgery gives an overall success rate of 98.9%. Linear salpingostomy was the main procedure performed in both groups. Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopy group compared with laparotomy group (p<0.001). Only 3 (3.81%) patients in the laparoscopy group required blood transfusion, whereas 16 (74.94%) in the laparotomy group needed transfusion (P<0.0001). The duration of operation in laparoscopy group was 53.2 ± 16.8 minutes and 84.5 ± 30.3 minutes in the laparotomy group. The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group 1.12±0.5 days compared to 5.25±0.1days in the laparotomy group (p<0.0001). ). In the laparoscopy group 57(72.4%) patients did not need analgesia after surgery compared with laparotomy group where all the patients needed analgesia.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic treatment (Salpingostomy or Salpingectomy) of EPs offers major benefits superior to laparotomy in terms of less blood loss, less need for blood transfusion and postoperative analgesia, a shorter duration of hospital stay. Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy might be the most beneficial procedure with maximal safety and efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
376
PDF
306

Author Biographies

Samsad Jahan, BIRDEM Dhaka

Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Tripti Rani Das, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka

Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Samira Humaira Habib, BADAS Dhaka

Health Economics Unit

Mahjabin Joarder, Bangladesh Medical College Dhaka

Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Nurun Nahar, Comilla Medical College Comilla

Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Manisha Banarjee, Dhaka Medical College Hospital Dhaka

Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Downloads

Published

2014-07-18

How to Cite

Jahan, S., Das, T. R., Habib, S. H., Jahan, A., Joarder, M., Nahar, N., & Banarjee, M. (2014). A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Management of Ectopic Pregnancy and Laparotomy: Experience in Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh: A Prospective Trial. Bangladesh Journal of Endosurgery, 2(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3329/bje.v2i1.19570

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors of articles published in BJE retain the copyright of their articles and are free to reproduce and disseminate their work. A Copyright and License Agreement – signed and dated by the corresponding author on behalf of all authors – must be submitted with each manuscript submission.

Copyright Agreement Form

Bangladesh Journal of Endosurgery (BJE) copyright and license agreement:

Title of the Article:

Manuscript No:

In submitting a research article ('article') to Bangladesh Journal of Endosurgery (BJE) I certify that:

1. I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.

2. I warrant, on behalf of myself and my co-authors, that:

  1. the article is original, has not been formally published in any other peer-reviewed journal, is not under consideration by any other journal and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights;
  2. I am/we are the sole author(s) of the article and have full authority to enter into this agreement and in granting rights to BJE are not in breach of any other obligation. If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, I/we will notify BJE at the time of submission upon which clauses 3 through 6 inclusive do not apply;
  3. the article contains nothing that is unlawful, libellous, or which would, if published, constitute a breach of contract or of confidence or of commitment given to secrecy;
  4. I/we have taken due care to ensure the integrity of the article. To my/our - and currently accepted scientific - knowledge all statements contained in it purporting to be facts are true and any formula or instruction contained in the article will not, if followed accurately, cause any injury, illness or damage to the user.

And I agree to the following license agreement:

BJE Open Access license agreement

Brief summary of the agreement

Anyone is free:

  • to copy, distribute, and display the work;
  • to make derivative works;
  • to make commercial use of the work;

Under the following conditions: Attribution

  • the original author must be given credit;
  • for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are;
  • any of these conditions can be waived if the authors gives permission.

Statutory fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above.

Full BJE Open Access license agreement

(Identical to the 'Creative Commons Attribution License')

Authors Full Name:

Signature:

Date: