Comparative analysis for the detection of tuberculosis by conventional and flurosence microscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v12i3.11104Keywords:
Comparative analysis, TB, Auramine-O and Ziehl-Neelsen stainingAbstract
Total of 300 TB patients sample were collected from NIDCH (Indoor and Outdoor) for six months period where three different specimens (sputum, pus, BAL) were collected among different age group (male and female). In sputum sample, percentage of identified samples in Auramine-O stain was 41% whereas in Z-N stain 32%; in pus sample, Auramine stain is 22% and Z-N stain 15%; In BAL sample, Auramine stain is 12% and Z-N stain is 10%. Therefore, out of 300 samples, 25% of positive samples were identified by Auramine-O staining whereas 19% of positive samples were identified by Z-N stain. In all the cases Auramine-O is found better for identification of TB than Z-N. In sputum, male positive 10%, female positive 3.66%; in pus sample, male positive 5% and female positive 2.33%; in BAL sample, male positive 3% and female positive 1%. Age group of 26 to 45 years were found high rate of TB in male patients.
Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol. 12 No. 03 July 13 Page 315-319
Downloads
132
91
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science agree to the following terms that:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science the right of first publication of the work.
Articles in Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0.This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.