Comparison of two disk diffusion and E-test methods in determining antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in isolated burn infections of Ahvaz City

Authors

  • Changiz Ahmadizadeh Changiz Ahmadizadeh, Department of Microbiology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran
  • Mehrdad Pashazadeh Department of Immunology, Faculties of Medicine Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey and Immunology Division, Department of Microbiology, Health Science Institute, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v19i4.46620

Keywords:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, disk diffusion, E. test, antibiotic sensitivity

Abstract

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa with widely distributed in nature, for human beings is considered an opportunistic pathogen that causes infections of broad-spectrum, including administrative, respiratory, septicemia and bacteremia and sepsis in patients with the burning city of Ahvaz.

Method and Material: A total of 95isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients from January 2015 assemble and biochemical identification test, then they are antibiotic resistance in E. test and disk diffusion method were compared.

Findings: From 95 different clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from E. test with the highest sensitivity to the antibiotic ceftazidime , 70(68/73%) and ciprofloxacin 50 (63/52%) and gentamicin 48 (52 /50 %) and the antibiotic imipenem 44 (31/46%) were sensitive and disk diffusion method antibiotic ceftazidime, 67(52/70%) and the antibiotic Ciprofloxacin 51(68/53%) and safety antibiotic imipenem 49(57/51%) and gentamicin 48(52/50%) were sensitive.

Conclusion: Statistically significant differences between E. test and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility of there (p<0.05) and disk diffusion method can replace E. test, and also the most sensitive antibiotics, the antibiotics used The study of the isolated Pseudomonas is ceftazidime.

Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.19(4) 2020 p.646-651

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
49
PDF
44

Downloads

Published

2020-04-12

How to Cite

Ahmadizadeh, C., & Pashazadeh, M. (2020). Comparison of two disk diffusion and E-test methods in determining antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in isolated burn infections of Ahvaz City. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 19(4), 646–651. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v19i4.46620

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish in the Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science agree to the following terms that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science the right of first publication of the work.

  2. Creative Commons Licence
    Articles in Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0.This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.