Comparison between outcome of Inside-out & Outside-in mastoidectomy

Authors

  • Md Afzal Karim Consultant of ENT, Sher e Bangla Medical College, Barisal
  • Md Mostafizur Rahman Assistant Professor, Pabna Medical College, Pabna
  • Fatema Nihar Assistant Surgeon, Bagra Union Subcenter, Munshiganj
  • Ahmmad Taous Associate Professor, Pabna Medical College, Pabna
  • Sheikh Mohammad Rafiqul Hossain Assistant Professor, Pabna Medical College, Pabna
  • Abdul Baten Mollah Senior Consultant, General Hospital, Pabna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v24i1.45331

Keywords:

mastoidectomy, Chronic suppurative otitis

Abstract

Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media is a disease that is known worldwide and that is more common in developing countries. Many techniques are available for operating the disease.

Objectives: To compare outcome between Inside-out & Outside-in mastoidectomy.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare outcome between Inside-Out & Outside-in mastoidectomy. Period of study was from July’ 2010 to March, 2012 in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, BSMMU- Dhaka

Result: majority of the patient were found dry mastoid cavity 13(68.42%) and rest were wet mastoid cavity 6 (31.58%).On the other hand in outside–in mastoidectomy dry mastoid cavity were 80.6% and wet were 19.4%. In inside-out mastoidectomy, among 8 attic cholesteatoma cases 5(62.50%) had gained hearing (average 6.66 dB) and 3(37.50%) had no gain or loss of hearing (average 3.89dB); among 11 entire mastoid bowl cholesteatoma cases 3(27.27%) had gained of hearing (average 6.11dB) and 8(72.73%) had no gain or loss of hearing (average 6.87dB)

Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; April 2018; 24(1): 29-36

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
20
PDF
27

Downloads

Published

2020-02-04

How to Cite

Karim, M. A., Rahman, M. M., Nihar, F., Taous, A., Hossain, S. M. R., & Mollah, A. B. (2020). Comparison between outcome of Inside-out & Outside-in mastoidectomy. Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 24(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v24i1.45331

Issue

Section

Original Articles