Comparative Study of Neck Swelling by Clinical, Cytological and Histopathological Examination

Authors

  • Mohammad Idrish Ali Consultant, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Md Mahmudul Huq Assistant Professor, Department ENT & Head Neck Surgery, Khulna Medical College Hospital, Khulna, Bangladesh
  • Momenul Haque Associate Professor, M Abdur Rahim Medical College, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
  • Kamrul Hasan Tarafder Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v26i1.47949

Keywords:

Neck swelling, FNAC, cytological, histological study

Abstract

Objective: In this study 50 patients of neck swelling were studied to compare the findings with clinical diagnosis and histopathological report for its diagnostic compatibility.

Methods: This cross sectional study was done in Department of Otolaryngology –Head & Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from July 2015 to June 2017. Fine needle aspiration cytology, MRI, CT scan, and histopathological examination of postoperative specimen of neck swelling, analyzed data presented by various tables, graphs and figures.

Results:In the present series 50 cases of neck swelling were studied. Out of these 50 cases 19 were male and 31 were female. The male, female ratio was 1:1.63. Age range was 4 – 60 years with maximum frequency in the 4th decade with the 3rd and 2nd in the following suit. Most of the patient were poor. Clinical, cytological and histopathological diagnosis were available in all the cases. The three sorts of diagnoses were compared with each other. Histopathologically 12 cases were tubercular lymphadenopathy. Metastatic carcinoma and lymphoma 5 cases for each. Twelve were nodular goiter, 5 were thyroid carcinoma. Rest were benign, congenital and nonspecific inflammatory conditions. Correct diagnosis were made by FNAC in 45 cases. In the rest 5 cases smear were unsatisfactory in 2 cases and gives inconclusive result, remaining 3 were follicular neoplasm and no definitive result were made which were subsequently diagnosed by histopathological examination as a follicular adenoma in 1 and follicular carcinoma in 2. Sensitivity of FNAC in the diagnosis of neck masses were found 91% for tuberculosis, 100% for metastatic carcinoma also for salivary gland tumour. In case of nodular goiter sensitivity was 92%. But it is only 60% sensitive in case of thyroid malignancy, as FNAC can not demarcate clearly between follicular adenoma and follicular cell carcinoma. But its accuracy in diagnosing papillary cell carcinoma of thyroid was 100%.

Conclusion: Keeping the limitations in mind, FNAC can reduce substantially the need of open biopsy for histopathological examination. Last of all I wish to conclude the study with the popular saying of Stewart “Diagnosis by aspiration is as reliable as the combined intelligence of the clinician and pathologist makes it”.

Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; April 2020; 26(1): 24-30

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
31
PDF
48

Downloads

Published

2020-07-01

How to Cite

Ali, M. I., Huq, M. M., Haque, M., & Tarafder, K. H. (2020). Comparative Study of Neck Swelling by Clinical, Cytological and Histopathological Examination. Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 26(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v26i1.47949

Issue

Vol. 26 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Original Articles

License

Manuscripts submitted for publication in the Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology must not have been previously submitted or published. Accepted papers become the permanent property of the Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. By submitting a manuscript, the authors(s) agree that copyrights for their articles are automatically transferred to Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, if and when the articles are accepted for publication.

The use, in this journal, of registered trade names, trade marks, etc. without special acknowledgement does not imply that such names, as defined by the relevant protection laws, be regarded as unprotected, and, thus, free for general use.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).