Comparison between Conventional Microdissection and CO2 Laser in the Treatment of Vocal Cord Polyp

Authors

  • - Mohammad Wahiduzzaman Assistant Professor, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka
  • Sayed Farhan Ali Razib Associate Professor, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka
  • Afroja Hossain Lecturer, Community Medicine, SSMC, Dhaka
  • Md Idrish Ali Consultant, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka
  • Md Habibur Rahman Consultant, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka
  • HM Mustafizur Rahman Consultant, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v27i1.53201

Keywords:

Conventional microlaryngeal surgery, CO2 laser, Stroboscopic examination, GRBAS indices

Abstract

Background: Vocal cord polyp usually arises from the epithelium and the lamina propria. Minimally invasive dissection procedures are employed to treat these vocal cord polyp for an effective outcome. Two types of microsurgical techniques were developed gradually and practiced namely, the conventional laryngeal microsurgery, which involves the use of cold instruments and the laryngeal laser micro-surgery.

Objective: To compare the conventional cold dissection and CO2 laser methods in treatment of vocal cord polyp.

Methods: A randomized prospective study was conducted at the Department of Otolayngology- Head & Neck Surgery, at Bangabondhu Sheikh Muzib Medical University (BSMMU) between July 2017 and June 2019. A total of 60 cases were studied on the following parameters: a. Visual analysis on stroboscopy b. Voice analysis –GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) indices c. Duration of surgery d. Peroperative bleeding.

Results: During first postoperative assessment, both groups had the normal symmetrical waves, while 50% of cases still had aperiodicity but all patients had the near normal periodicity in the second postoperative assessment. Regarding glottic closure, during preoperative assessment, almost all patients had incomplete glottic closure due to mass lesion as polyps. During first postoperative assessment, glottic closure was found to be better in group B (83% of cases) than group A (76% of cases), while during second postoperative assessment, all patients of both groups had around 95% glottic closure. The mean duration oflaser technique (7.1 ± 1.1 minutes) was less than the conventional technique time (15.6 ± 1.9 minutes), also mean of operative bleeding of laser technique (zero pack) is less than the conventional two(2 packs).

Conclusion: There is no significant difference between both groups in all parameters except operative time and bleeding, as laser technique has less time and clear field.

Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; April 2021; 27(1): 17-24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
3
PDF
2

Downloads

Published

2021-04-28

How to Cite

Mohammad Wahiduzzaman, .-., Razib, S. F. A., Hossain, A., Ali, M. I., Rahman, M. H., & Rahman, H. M. (2021). Comparison between Conventional Microdissection and CO2 Laser in the Treatment of Vocal Cord Polyp. Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 27(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v27i1.53201

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Original Articles

License

Manuscripts submitted for publication in the Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology must not have been previously submitted or published. Accepted papers become the permanent property of the Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. By submitting a manuscript, the authors(s) agree that copyrights for their articles are automatically transferred to Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, if and when the articles are accepted for publication.

The use, in this journal, of registered trade names, trade marks, etc. without special acknowledgement does not imply that such names, as defined by the relevant protection laws, be regarded as unprotected, and, thus, free for general use.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).