Outcome Variation of CO 2 Laser and MicrodrillAssisted Stapedotomy in Otosclerosis

Authors

  • Imranul Hoque Registrar, Department of ENT-Head & Neck Surgery, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital
  • Delwar Hossain Professor, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University.
  • Amit Kumar Thakur Research Medical Officer, National Institute of ENT
  • Muhammad Rasedul Hasan Bulbul Indoor Medical Officer, Dept. of ENT & HNS, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College, Faridpur
  • Atiqur Rahman Medical Officer, 250 Bed District Hospital,Chapai Nawabgonj
  • Saad Zaman Registrar, Dept. of ENT & Head & HNS,Cumilla Medical College Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v30i1.77112

Keywords:

Otosclerosis, Stapedotomy, CO2 laser stapedotomy, Microdrill assisted stapedotomy.

Abstract

Background: CO2 laser and microdrill-assisted stapedotomy are widely performed procedures in otolaryngology practice. However, definite information regarding surgical advances, postoperative results, complications and how and in which patients these surgical techniques should be exclusively used is a source of continuous discussion.

Aim: To compare the outcome of CO2 laser and microdrill-assisted stapedotomy in patients with otosclerosis.

Methodology: We enrolled 26 cases as study sample on the basis of selection criteria. All these patients were evaluated by a complete clinical head and neck examination, preoperative oto-microscopic evaluation,pure tone audiometry (PTA) and a high-resolution CT scan.One group of patientswere treated by CO2 laser stapedotomy, and another group by microdrill-assisted stapedotomy. Fisher’s Exact test and Student’s t-test were done as appropriate, and a p-value <0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

Results: Maximum patients 9(69.2%) and 7(53.8%) were in the age group of 20-30 years in Group A (CO2 laser stapedotomy) and Group B (Microdrill assisted stapedotomy), respectively. The difference in the mean postoperative air–bone gap was not statistically significant (p=0.679) between the groups. All surgical procedures compared in our study showed the surgical success of > 90%. In present study, 8(61.5%) and 9(69.2%) of the study subjects presented with tinnitus in the CO2 and Microdrill groups, respectively. 1(7.7%) and 1(7.7%) of the study subjects presented with dizziness in both groups, respectively. At 3 months postoperative follow-up, only 1(7.7%) case in the CO 2 laser group and 4(30.8%) cases in the Microdrill group developed complications. Among them, 1 (7.7%) and 2(15.4%) cases developed permanent vertigo in CO2 and Microdrill groups, respectively. 1(7.7%) case developed chorda tympani injury, and 1(7.7%) case developed worsened tinnitus in the Microdrill group. No significant (p>0.05) difference was observed between the groups regarding postoperative complications at 3 months.

Conclusion: After analyzing the results of the present study, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between CO2 laser and microdrill-assisted stapedotomy in terms of hearing outcome and complication.

Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngology 2024; 30(1): 15-23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
55
PDF
36

Downloads

Published

2024-11-19

How to Cite

Hoque, I., Hossain, D., Thakur, A. K., Bulbul, M. R. H., Rahman, A., & Zaman, S. (2024). Outcome Variation of CO 2 Laser and MicrodrillAssisted Stapedotomy in Otosclerosis. Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 30(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v30i1.77112

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Original Articles

License

Manuscripts submitted for publication in the Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology must not have been previously submitted or published. Accepted papers become the permanent property of the Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. By submitting a manuscript, the authors(s) agree that copyrights for their articles are automatically transferred to Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, if and when the articles are accepted for publication.

The use, in this journal, of registered trade names, trade marks, etc. without special acknowledgement does not imply that such names, as defined by the relevant protection laws, be regarded as unprotected, and, thus, free for general use.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).