A comparison of three discrete methods for classification of heart disease data

Authors

  • D Chaki Department of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka
  • A Das Department of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka
  • MI Zaber Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v50i4.25839

Keywords:

Classification, Comparison, C4.5 Classifier, Naïve bayes classifier, SVM Classifier, Heart disease data

Abstract

The classification of heart disease patients is of great importance in cardiovascular disease diagnosis. Numerous data mining techniques have been used so far by the researchers to aid health care professionals in the diagnosis of heart disease. For this task, many algorithms have been proposed in the previous few years. In this paper, we have studied different supervised machine learning techniques for classification of heart disease data and have performed a procedural comparison of these. We have used the C4.5 decision tree classifier, a naïve Bayes classifier, and a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier over a large set of heart disease data. The data used in this study is the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Heart Disease Data Set available at UCI Machine Learning Repository. We have found that SVM outperformed both naïve Bayes and C4.5 classifier, giving the best accuracy rate of correctly classifying highest number of instances. We have also found naïve Bayes classifier achieved a competitive performance though the assumption of normality of the data is strongly violated.

Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res. 50(4), 293-296, 2015

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
258
PDF
184

Author Biography

D Chaki, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University, Dhaka



Downloads

Published

2015-12-11

How to Cite

Chaki, D., Das, A., & Zaber, M. (2015). A comparison of three discrete methods for classification of heart disease data. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 50(4), 293–296. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v50i4.25839

Issue

Section

Articles