Evaluating CNN Models for Gait Recognition: A Study on the CASIA-B Dataset

Authors

  • Md Mehedi Hasan Department of CSE, Varendra University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Mohammad Asif Ul Haq Department of CSE, Varendra University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Md Hasan Maruf Department of CSE, Varendra University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Nakib Aman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/gubjse.v10i1.74941

Keywords:

Gait recognition, CNN model, CASIA B dataset, Deep learning, Computer Vision

Abstract

Gait recognition, a form of biometric identification, has garnered considerable interest for its ability to identify individuals from a distance. Yet, its effectiveness depends significantly on the precision of the underlying categorization models. This study thoroughly evaluates many Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models to determine their effectiveness in properly identifying and categorizing gait patterns. We train and test several CNN architectures using advanced deep learning techniques on the widely known CASIA-B dataset, which is a benchmark dataset for gait recognition research. The analyses involve models like as VGG16, VGG19, NASNetLarge, NASNetMobile, EfficientNetB0, and Xception, each well-known for their effectiveness in picture categorization tasks. We evaluate the performance of these models by conducting thorough experiments and detailed analysis, focusing on accuracy, validation loss, and other pertinent metrics. The Xception model demonstrated the highest accuracy of 97.17% of the models assessed. This model frequently surpasses similar models, demonstrating its strength and effectiveness in precisely recognizing gait patterns. On the other hand, the accuracy of other models varied from 9.78% to 93.85%, demonstrating the variable levels of efficacy among various designs. The findings have significant implications for the creation and implementation of gait recognition systems. The high precision demonstrated by the Xception model highlights the promise of CNN-based methods in progressing gait identification technology. Our work highlights the significance of choosing suitable model architectures for achieving the best performance in gait detection tasks. In the future, research may focus on using larger datasets and exploring other CNN architectures to improve the accuracy and reliability of gait detection systems. Our goal is to enhance gait recognition technology to improve biometric identification for security, surveillance, and healthcare applications.

GUB JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, Vol 10(1), 2023 P 17-26

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
136
PDF
116

Downloads

Published

2024-07-15

How to Cite

Hasan, M. M., Haq, M. A. U., Maruf, M. H., & Nakib Aman. (2024). Evaluating CNN Models for Gait Recognition: A Study on the CASIA-B Dataset. GUB Journal of Science and Engineering, 10(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.3329/gubjse.v10i1.74941

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Green University of Bangladesh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in the GUB Journal of Science and Engineering agree to the following terms that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the GUB Journal of Science and Engineering the right of first publication of the work.
  2. image
    Articles in GUB Journal of Science and Engineering are licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. This license permits Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

Copyright and Reprint Permissions

  1. Individual contributions contained in it are protected by the copyright of Green University of Bangladesh.
  2. Photocopies of this journal in full or parts for personal or classroom usage may be allowed provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and the copies bear this notice and the full citation.
  3. Copyright for components of this work owned by others must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted.
  4. Specific permission of the publisher and payment of a fee are required for multiple or systemic copying, advertising or promotional purposes, resale, republishing, posting on servers, redistributing to lists and all forms of document delivery.
  5. Subscribers may reproduce a table of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal circulation within their institutions.
  6. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale and distribution outside the institution. Permission of the publisher is required for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations.
  7. Except as outlined above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, such as electronic, mechanical, photocopying, magnetic recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher.
  8. Permissions may be sought directly from the office of the executive editor of GUB Journal of Science and Engineering through E-mail at gubjse@fse.green.edu.bd.

Notice

  • Responsibility for the contents of an article rests upon the author(s) and not upon the editor or the publisher. Therefore, on responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, product instructions or ideas contained in the material herein.