Comparison of Three Mycobacterial DNA Extraction Methods from Extrapulmonary Samples for PCR Assay

Authors

  • Khandaker Shadia Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka
  • Shaheda Anwar Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka
  • Sayera Banu Tuberculosis Laboratory, Laboratory Sciences Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research
  • Ahmed Abu Saleh Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka
  • Md Ruhul Amin Miah Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v6i1.14711

Keywords:

Tuberculosis, extrapulmonary, DNA, extraction

Abstract

Sensitivity of the molecular diagnostic tests of extrapulmonary tuberculosis largely depends upon the efficiency of DNA extraction methods. The objective of our study was to compare three methods of extracting DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for testing by polymerase chain reaction. All three methods; heating, heating with sonication and addition of lysis buffer with heating and sonication were implicated on 20 extrapulmonary samples. PCR positivity was 2 (10%), 4 (20%) and 7 (35%) in the samples extracted by heating, heat+sonication and heat+sonication+lysis buffer method respectively. Of the extraction methods evaluated, maximum PCR positive results were achieved by combined heat, sonication and lysis buffer method which can be applied in routine clinical practice.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v6i1.14711

Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2012; 6(1): 9-11

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1048
PDF
745

Downloads

Published

2013-04-22

How to Cite

Shadia, K., Anwar, S., Banu, S., Saleh, A. A., & Miah, M. R. A. (2013). Comparison of Three Mycobacterial DNA Extraction Methods from Extrapulmonary Samples for PCR Assay. Ibrahim Medical College Journal, 6(1), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.3329/imcj.v6i1.14711

Issue

Section

Original Articles