Dose-dependent response to phytobiotic supplementation in feed on growth, hematology, intestinal pH, and gut bacterial load in broiler chicken

Authors

  • Md Mustafijur Rahman Ripon Department of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Md Harunur Rashid Department of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Md Moshiur Rahman Department of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Md Faisal Ferdous Department of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Md Shafiul Arefin Department of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Aminatu Abubakar Sani Department of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Muhammad Tofazzal Hossain Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Muslah Uddin Ahammad Department of Poultry Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
  • Kazi Rafiq Department of Pharmacology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh

Keywords:

Growth promoter; phytobiotic; hematology; intestinal pH; gut bacteria; broiler

Abstract

Objective: The present study was aimed to evaluate dose-dependent effects of phytobiotic (Galibiotic) supplements in feed on growth performance, hematological parameters, intestinal pH, and gut bacterial population in broiler chick.

Materials and Methods: A total of 50 ten day old broiler chicks were divided into five groups, namely, Group A as control (without galibiotic), Group B (galibiotic at 1 gm/kg feed), Group C (gal­ibiotic at 2 gm/kg feed), Group D (galibiotic at 5 gm/kg feed), and Group E (galibiotic at 10 gm/kg feed). All the birds were reared for 42 days and samples were collected before and after sacrifice.

Results: Live body weights showed no significant differences between the groups but overall feed conversion ratios (FCRs) of treatment groups were significantly low in Group E having the lowest. Blood samples collected for hematology differed significantly (p < 0.01) among the different groups. Intestinal pH was lower in treatment groups with Group E having the lowest. Cecal total viable count was highest in Group A and lowest in Group E. The cecal coliform count was low in all the treatment groups.

Conclusion: Along with previously published report, it may conclude that the phytobiotic could be used as an alternative to antibiotics due to positive growth performance, lower FCR, carcass quality, and improved gut health of broiler chicks.

J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 6(2): 253-259, June 2019

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
351
PDF
271

Downloads

Published

2019-06-13

How to Cite

Ripon, M. M. R., Rashid, M. H., Rahman, M. M., Ferdous, M. F., Arefin, M. S., Sani, A. A., Hossain, M. T., Ahammad, M. U., & Rafiq, K. (2019). Dose-dependent response to phytobiotic supplementation in feed on growth, hematology, intestinal pH, and gut bacterial load in broiler chicken. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 6(2), 253–259. Retrieved from https://banglajol.info/index.php/JAVAR/article/view/41770

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).