Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in goats in some selected areas of Bangladesh

Authors

  • Md Nuruzzaman Munsi Goat and Sheep Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh.
  • Sonia Akther Goat and Sheep Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh.
  • Md Habibur Rahman Goat and Sheep Production Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh.
  • Md Zakir Hassan Animal Health Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh.
  • Md Zulfekar Ali Animal Health Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh.
  • Md Ershaduzzaman Socio-Economic Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka-1341, Bangladesh.

Keywords:

Brucellosis; seroprevalence; goat; RBPT; c-ELISA

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the seroprevalence of Brucella spp. in goats in some selected areas of Bangladesh.  Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in different goat-populated regions of Bangladesh from July 2017 to June 2018. A total of 208 serum samples were randomly collected from goats in Jashore (n = 50), Jhenidah (n = 22), Tangail (n = 40), Savar (n = 46), Thakurgaon (n = 18), and Bandarban (n = 32) areas. The samples were subjected to determine the presence of antibodies against Brucella spp. by rose bengal plate test (RBPT) and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA).  Results: Overall, the seroprevalence of Brucellosis in goats was 4.33% (n = 9/208) by RBPT and 2.40% (n = 5/208) by c-ELISA. The seroprevalence of brucellosis on the basis of RBPT was 6% (buck: 0%, doe: 6%) in Jashore, 4.5% (buck: 0%, doe: 4.5%) in Jhenidah, 2.5% (buck: 0%, doe: 2.5%) in Tangail, 4.35% (buck: 0%, doe: 4.35%) in Savar, 6.25% (buck: 0%, doe: 6.25%) in Bandarban, and 5.56% (buck: 0%, doe: 5.56%) in Thakurgaon. On the other hand, the seroprevalence of brucel­losis by c-ELISA was 4% (buck: 0%, doe: 4%) in Jashore, 4.5% (buck: 0%, doe: 4.5%) in Jhenidah, 3.13% (buck: 0%, doe: 3.13%) in Bandarban, and 5.56% (buck: 0%, doe: 5.56%) in Thakurgaon. Brucellosis was more prevalent (p > 0.001) in does aging 3–4 years.  Conclusion: Goats from different areas of Bangladesh are caring antibodies against Brucella organisms. Further bacteriological investigations are necessary.

J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 8(1): 123-128, Mar 2021

http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2021.h494

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
26
PDF
16

Downloads

Published

2021-03-06

How to Cite

Munsi, M. N., Akther, S., Rahman, M. H., Hassan, M. Z., Ali, M. Z., & Ershaduzzaman, M. (2021). Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in goats in some selected areas of Bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 8(1), 123–128. Retrieved from https://banglajol.info/index.php/JAVAR/article/view/76020

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Md Nuruzzaman Munsi, Sonia Akther, Md Habibur Rahman, Md Zakir Hassan, Md Zulfekar Ali, Md Ershaduzzaman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).