Classification and regression tree analysis to predict calving ease in Sussex heifers using pelvic area dimensions and morphological trait

Authors

  • Lubabalo Bila Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
  • Thobela Louis Tyasi School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa.
  • Pieter Fourie Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
  • Aphiwe Katikati Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Keywords:

Calving ease; Correlation; Hip height; Pelvic height; Sussex heifers

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between pelvic measure­ments, namely pelvic height (PH), pelvic area (PA), and pelvic width, and linear body measure­ment traits, such as hindquarters width, rump length (RL), hip height (HH), body weight (BW), shoulder height, chest depth (CD), body length, and also calve birth weight (CBW) under different calving ease scores, namely no assistance, gently pull, and hard pull.  Material and Methods: A total of 51 first calf Sussex heifers at 24 months old, weighing approx­imately 440 ± 40.26 kg, were used for this study. Two-year-old bulls (n = 2), weighing approxi­mately 800 kg, were used for mating the 51 heifers with a bull to cow ratio of 1:30 and 1:21. The fertility of bulls was assessed by a private veterinarian before the mating season. Calving ease was scored as follows: 1 = no assistance during parturition (normal), 2 = heifer assistance as gently pull, 3 = heifer assistance as hard pull, 4 = heifer cannot calf, 5 = heifer calved a dead calf, and 6 = heifer calf with the abnormal position.  Results: Descriptive statistics indicated that PH (p < 0.01) and RL (p < 0.05) were positively remark­able and different among calving ease scores. Correlation results of the no assistance Sussex heifers group revealed that CBW was positively correlated (p < 0.05) with PH. Classification and regression tree CART results demonstrated that PH, BW, CD, and HH play an important role in predicting calving ease in Sussex heifers.  Conclusion: The findings suggest that there is an association among PAs and biometric traits. The present study might help farmers select animals with higher PH, BW, CD, and HH during breeding to lower dystocia incidents during parturition. However, further studies need to be carried out in CART modeling to reduce dystocia in a larger sample size of Sussex heifers or other cattle breeds.

J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 8(1): 164-172, Mar 2021

http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2021.h499

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
25
PDF
17

Downloads

Published

2020-03-20

How to Cite

Bila, L., Tyasi, T. L., Fourie, P., & Katikati, A. (2020). Classification and regression tree analysis to predict calving ease in Sussex heifers using pelvic area dimensions and morphological trait. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 8(1), 164–172. Retrieved from https://banglajol.info/index.php/JAVAR/article/view/76040

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Lubabalo Bila, Thobela Louis Tyasi, Pieter Fourie, Aphiwe Katikati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).