In vitro ruminal fermentation, methane emissions, and nutritional value of different tropical feedstuffs for ruminants

Authors

  • Muhammad Khairul Bashar Department of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Bangladesh. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-5483
  • Eva Haese Department of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7795-1750
  • Nasrin Sultana Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Bangladesh.
  • Markus Rodehutscord Department of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3156-7889

Keywords:

In vitro digestibility; nutritional composition; methane emissions; tropical feedstuffs

Abstract

Objective: This research aimed to evaluate in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane (CH4 ) emissions, and the relationship between the nutritional content and CH4 emissions of tropical feedstuffs to formulate low CH4 -emitting feeds for ruminants. Materials and Methods: Eighteen feedstuffs, including roughages (3 crop residues, 2 silages, 3 common grasses, and 4 leguminous fodder) and 6 concentrates, were evaluated using the Hohenheim Gas Test. Approximately 200 mg of feed were incubated with a rumen fluid-buffer solution for 72 h to test gas production (GP) and 120 mg for 24 h to determine the CH4 concentration in the gas. Digestibility of organic matter (dOM) and metabolizable energy (ME) were calculated using GP data. Results: Leguminous fodder contained the highest crude protein (CP) concentration (166–314 gm/kg dry matter (DM)), followed by common grasses (52–147 gm/kg DM) and silages (94–106 gm/kg DM), but the lowest concentration of detergent fiber fractions. Crushed wheat and maize had higher dOM and ME (87.8% and 90.9%, and 14.4 MJ/kg DM and 13.8 MJ/kg DM, respectively), and their CH4 concentration (% of GP) and CH4 emissions(L CH4 /kg dOM) followed a similar trend asthe other feedstuffs. The dOM and ME of German grass and Ipil-ipil were higher, whereas the CH4 concentration and CH4 emissions were lower compared to crop residues and other common grasses. The CH4 emissions originating from the feedstuffs were positively correlated with the concentration of neutral detergent fiber and GP and negatively correlated with CP. Conclusion: Our result provides an opportunity to select feed ingredients with higher digestibility and concurrently less CH4 emissions in formulating diets for ruminants when using commonly available feed resources in many tropical countries. This may enhance animal productive performances while reducing the impact of animal production on the environment.   

J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 11(4): 924–935, December 2024

http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k842

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
27
PDF
19

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Bashar, M. K., Haese, E., Sultana, N., & Rodehutscord, M. (2024). In vitro ruminal fermentation, methane emissions, and nutritional value of different tropical feedstuffs for ruminants. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 11(4), 924–935. Retrieved from https://banglajol.info/index.php/JAVAR/article/view/81122

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Khairul Bashar, Eva Haese, Nasrin Sultana, Markus Rodehutscord

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).