Prospective Comparison of Conventional External Dacryocystorhinostomy and Endonasal Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy

Authors

  • S M Ahmed Faruque Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Park View Medical College Hospital, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh
  • Ashrafee Noor Badrunnesa Residential Surgeon, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh
  • Prionti Saha Department of Medicine, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh
  • Iftasham Ahmed Mafi 5th Year M.B.B.S Student, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Iftahaz Ahmed Shafi 5th Year M B B S Student, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Md Asaduzzaman Assistant Registrar, Department of Medicine, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v42i4.76322

Keywords:

lacrimal sac, epiphora, chronic dacryocystitis, external dacryocystorhinostomy, endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

Abstract

Background:Epiphora, a common manifestation of chronic dacryocystitis, requires definitive treatment through dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), a surgical procedure aimed at creating an alternative fluid drainage pathway.This study aimed to assess how effective both external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) and  endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (Endo-DCR) are in managing chronic dacryocystitis, with a specific focus on surgical duration, complication rates, and treatment outcomes.

Methods: In this study, sixty participants were prospectively enrolled and evenly divided into two groups. Thirty patients were assigned to the first group and underwent En-DCR surgery, while the second group, also comprising thirty patients, underwent Ex-DCR surgery. Both groups were monitored for a duration of 9 months and assessed for surgical duration, perioperative and postoperative complications, and eventual surgical outcomes.

Results: The distribution of patients across age groups and sexes was similar between the two groups (p>0.05). Clinical features such as epiphora, epiphora with discharge, and epiphora with swelling were comparable between groups. En-DCR group demonstrated significantly less intraoperative bleeding (mean:13.5 ml vs 50 ml; p<0.0001) and shorter operative durations (mean: 20 mins vs 37.5 mins; p<0.0001) compared to Ex-DCR group. Complications such as nasal bleeding and hematoma were minimal in both groups, with no significant differences noted. The final outcome, categorized as success (En-DCR vs Ex-DCR: 76.7% vs 83.3%) or failure (23.3% vs 16.7%), did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion:Both surgical techniques offer feasible alternatives for addressing issues related to nasolacrimal obstruction.

J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2024; 42: 355-362

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
22
PDF
11

Downloads

Published

2024-10-28

How to Cite

Faruque, S. M. A., Badrunnesa, A. N., Saha, P., Mafi, I. A., Shafi, I. A., & Asaduzzaman, M. (2024). Prospective Comparison of Conventional External Dacryocystorhinostomy and Endonasal Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy. Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons, 42(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v42i4.76322

Issue

Vol. 42 No. 4 (2024)

Section

Original Articles

License

Submission of a manuscript for publication implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the publisher upon acceptance. Accepted manuscripts become the permanent property of the Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons and may not be reproduced by any means in whole or in part without the written consent of the publisher.

No part of the materials published in this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Reprints of any article in the Journal will be available from the publisher.