Comparison of Short-Term Outcome Following Early Versus Conventional Closure of Temporary Covering Ileostomy Stoma

Authors

  • Kazi Md Asif Hasnan Registrar of Colorectal Surgery, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram.
  • Shakera Ahmed Associate Professor of Surgery, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram.
  • Ahsanul Abedin Assistant Professor of Surgery, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram.
  • Nadia Sultana Lecturer of Pharmacology, Dhaka Dental College, Dhaka.
  • Mukut Roy Specialist in General & Minimal Invasive Surgery, Evercare Hospital, Chattogram.
  • Jamshed Giasuddin EMO, Lohagara Health Complex, Chattogram.
  • Tahmina Hossain Assistant Professor of Pathology, Chattagram International Medical College, Chattogram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v35i2.85990

Keywords:

Early stoma closure; Ileostomy stoma; Length of hospital stay.

Abstract

Background: An ileostomy is a surgical procedure in which the small intestine (Ileum) is diverted through an opening in the abdominal wall, creating a stoma to allow waste to bypass the colon and exit the body. Early and conventional closure of ileostomy stomas are strategies to restore bowel continuity after temporary diversion. Early closure, performed within weeks, may reduce complications like dehydration and enhance recovery, while conventional closure, typically after 8-12 weeks, minimizes risks of anastomotic failure. Optimal timing balances patient safety and recovery outcomes. To assess the differences between the standard stoma closure and early stoma closure after a temporary covering ileostomy stoma and the post-operative results of them.

Materials and methods: This quasi-experimental investigation was carried out throughout September 2021 to August 2022. There were 66 patients with temporary covering ileostomies in all, 33 of whom had early closure while the remaining 33 received traditional stoma closure. Patients were monitored after surgery on the first, fifth, and eighth postoperative days, as well as for two weeks after the index procedure.

Results: All the patients were evaluated for wound infection, abdominal distension, anastomotic leakage and Length of Hospital stay (LoH) post operatively. The overall complications were in 1 st  POD (12% vs 33.3%, p=0.039), 5 th  POD (21.2% vs 36.4%, p=0.174 ns), 8 Th POD (21.2% vs 33.3%, p=0.268 ns ) after after 2 weeks (6.1% vs 27.3%, p=0.020). LoH was (93.9% vs 69.7%, p=0.010).

Conclusion: Early closure group showed less complications then conventional closure group. More patients stayed at hospital less then 10 days post operatively in early closure group. So it can be said that early ileostomy closure is possible and can be done to reduce morbidity in patients.

JCMCTA 2024 ; 35 (2) : 164-169

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
0
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

Hasnan, K. M. A., Ahmed, S., Abedin, A., Sultana, N., Roy, M., Giasuddin, J., & Hossain, T. (2025). Comparison of Short-Term Outcome Following Early Versus Conventional Closure of Temporary Covering Ileostomy Stoma . Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers’ Association, 35(2), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v35i2.85990

Issue

Section

Papers and Originals