A Comparative Study Between Amniotic Membrane and Hydrocolloid in the Healing of Partial Thickness Burn Wounds

Authors

  • Fatima Farhana Assistant Professor, Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery
  • Sharif Muhammad Mahmudul Hasan Majumder Registrar, Department of Urology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jcomcta.v28i2.78012

Keywords:

Amniotic membrane, Hydrocolloid, Partial thickness burn wound, Healing

Abstract

Background: Management of partial thickness burn wounds is mostly conservative, and rapid wound healing is desirable to obtain a good functional and cosmetic outcome. Wound dressing materials play an important role in maintaining an optimal wound milieu and avoiding complications from delayed healing.

Methods: From January 2018 to December 2018, the study was conducted as a clinical trial over 100 patients at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. The patients who sustained partial thickness burn < 15% TBSA were included in the study, equally allocated between two (2) comparison groups (Group A: amniotic membrane and Group B: hydrocolloid), and the clinical efficacy and functionality of the two groups regarding the rapidity of wound healing, frequency of dressing changes, requirement of analgesics, rate of infections, and need for a skin graft were assessed.

Results: Hydrocolloid dressing showed a shorter healing time (p<0.002), less frequent dressing change (p<0.001), lower requirements of pain medication (p<0.001), and improved patients comfort which were statistically significant. 

Conclusion: Amniotic membrane showed comparable clinical and functional efficacy with hydrocolloid in burn wound healing, with superior healing time and comfort in favor of the later.

J Com Med Col Teachers Asso July 2024; 28(2): 58-64

Abstract
37
PDF
26

Downloads

Published

2024-12-15

How to Cite

Farhana, F., & Majumder, S. M. M. H. (2024). A Comparative Study Between Amniotic Membrane and Hydrocolloid in the Healing of Partial Thickness Burn Wounds. Journal of Comilla Medical College Teachers&#039; Association, 28(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.3329/jcomcta.v28i2.78012

Issue

Section

Original Article