Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Uropathogens Isolated at a Private Hospital in Khulna, Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/mediscope.v11i1.71637Keywords:
Uropathogens, Gram-positive cocci, Gram-negative bacilli, Antibiotic resistanceAbstract
Background & objectives: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious diseases affecting all age & sex groups, causing significant morbidity & mortality with a substantial economic burden. Due to the irrational empiric use of antibiotics, resistance is increasing at an alarming rate. Bacteria causing UTIs & their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern varies among different areas & changes frequently over time. This study aimed to identify microorganisms causing UTI at a private hospital in the southern part of Bangladesh & to determine their sensitivity pattern towards commonly used antibiotics. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the clinical pathology & microbiology laboratory at Islami Bank Hospital (IBH), Khulna during the period of January’2021 to July’2021. Clean catch midstream urine samples (MSU) from 221 clinically suspected UTI cases of all age & sex groups were included in the study. Uropathogens were isolated & identified by standard microbiological techniques & susceptibility was determined by Kirby Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: Among 221 suspected UTI cases, 108 (48.8%) were positive for urine culture, of which 103 (95.37%) showed antimicrobial growth. The majority 75 (69.4%) of the culture-positive cases were female. E. coli 50(44.24%) was the most predominant bacterial isolate, followed by Klebsiella 18(15.92%) & Enterococcus 16(14.15%). All Isolated gram-positive cocci (GPC) showed very high sensitivity to Vancomycin (83.3% to 100%), Linezolid (87.5% to 100%) & moderate sensitivity to Meropenem (66.7% to 75%). However, they showed relatively lower sensitivity to Ciprofloxacin, Doxycycline, Gentamicin, and Amoxiclav & very poor sensitivity to Nitrofurantoin (31.3% to 50% only). Levofloxacin had relatively better sensitivity against GPC (S. aureus- 83.3% & CONS- 75%), except Enterococcus. All gram-negative bacilli (GNB) showed a very good sensitivity towards Amikacin & Meropenem, ranging from 77.8% to 100%. E. coli & Pseudomonas were highly sensitive to Piperacillin-Tazobactam (90% & 88.9% respectively). GNB were poorly sensitive to commonly used 3rd generation cephalosporins, Azithromycin, Amoxiclav & Ciprofloxacin. Except for Pseudomonas & Klebsiella, Levofloxacin showed relatively good sensitivity against other GNB. Nitrofurantoin showed lower sensitivity against GNB, except for Pseudomonas (66.7%) & Enterobacter (75%). Conclusion: E. coli remains the most predominant uropathogen. Vancomycin, linezolid, Levofloxacin & Meropenem were very effective against GPC whereas Amikacin, Piperacillin- tazobactam & Meropenem showed good responses against GNB. Empiric antibiotics must be selected based on the current antibiogram of uropathogens in a particular area to prevent the increasing trends of antimicrobial resistance.
Mediscope 2024;11(1): 01-12
Downloads
62
60
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdullah-Al-Faroque, Md. Mokter Hossain, Abu Md. Mayeenuddin Al Amin, Muhammad Ashraful Kabir, Mahabuba Khatun, Jiban Nesa, Md. Zahirul Huq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the Mediscope agree to the following terms that:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Mediscope the right of first publication of the work.
Articles in Mediscope are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0. This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.