Spectrum of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Findings in Patients with Dysphagia: A Study of 147 Cases

Authors

  • Ramesh Lamichhane Department of Internal Medicine, Jalalabad Ragib Rabeya Medical College Sylhet, Bangladesh
  • Madhusudan Saha Department of Gastroenterology, Sylhet Women's Medical College Hospital Sylhet, Bangladesh
  • Gopal Kumar Yadav Medical Officer, Department of Internal Medicine, Kalaiya District Hospital Bara, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v34i2.61429

Keywords:

Dysphagia, gastrointestinal endoscopy, malignancy.

Abstract

Introduction: This retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study was done to see upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in patients presenting with dysphagia.

Materials and Methods: Reports of patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were retrieved from endoscopy records. Data regarding age, gender, and endoscopic features and impressions were collected. The data analysis was done using IBM SPSS® v21 (IBM, Armonk, New York). Frequency, proportions, mean ± SD, and range were calculated.

Results: Out of 147 participants, the mean age of the participants was 53.46 ± 15.99 years. There was an equal proportion of participants of each gender (50.3% female and 49.6% male). The prevalence of endoscopic abnormalities was 93.8%. Most of the participants had carcinoma esophagus (38.7%, 57) followed by gastritis (35.3%, 52), gastric polyp (10.8%, 16), and duodenitis (8.8%, 13).

Conclusion: Dysphagia is an alarming symptom that warrants prompt evaluation. With diagnostic and therapeutic value, upper GI (gastrointestinal) endoscopy remains a rapid initial effective tool in the evaluation of patients with dysphagia.

Medicine Today 2022 Vol.34(2): 136-139

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
23
PDF
40

Downloads

Published

2022-10-10

How to Cite

Lamichhane, R., Saha, M. ., & Yadav, G. K. (2022). Spectrum of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Findings in Patients with Dysphagia: A Study of 147 Cases. Medicine Today, 34(2), 136–139. https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v34i2.61429

Issue

Section

Original Articles