Outcome of Arterio-Venous Fistula With and Without Central Venous Catheter in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease

Authors

  • Md Ferdoush Rayhan Junior Consultant, Department of Surgery, Manikganj 250 Bed District Hospital, Manikganj-1800.
  • Luna Ahmed Junior Consultant, Department of Radiology & Imaging, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka-1207.
  • Mina Ahmed Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Chattogram Medical College & Hospital, Chattogram-4203.
  • Reazul Alam Junior Consultant, Department of Surgery, National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital (NICRH), Dhaka-1212.
  • Mohammad Rezaul Hossain Assistant Registrar, Department of Nephrology, Manikganj Medical College Hospital, Manikganj-1800.
  • Dewan Ali Hassan Chowdhury Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, Sylhet Women’s Medical College & Hospital, Sylhet-3100.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/mumcj.v8i2.85801

Keywords:

Arteriovenous fistula, central venous catheter, haemodialysis, end stage renal disease.

Abstract

End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients often need to secure a vascular access for haemodialysis and arterio-venous fistula (AVF) is intended to serve the purpose. However, an AV fistula needs at least 4-6 weeks to get anatomically set and physiologically functional. We observe that a good number of patients undergo haemodialysis by central venous catheter (CVC) before securing an AV fistula. This cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted among 80 patients of ESRD referred to the Department of Surgery, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, between January and June of 2016, to compare early outcome of arterio-venous fistula with and without central venous catheter. Patients having AV fistula with CVC were enrolled in group A (n=40), and patients without CVC were in group B (n=40). The mean age was 59.25±10.95 years in group A and 60.62±10.35 years in group B. A male predominance was observed; male-female ratio was 3.44:1. During follow-up visits, adverse events like erythema, haematoma formation, serous or serosanguinous discharge were found less in group B compared to group A. Among complications, wound infection, pseudoaneurysm, stenosis and total fistula failure (within three months) was observed less in group B. Our study demonstrated that patients having arterio-venous fistula without central venous catheter had better outcome along with less complications than those had A-V fistula with central venous catheter. Hence, A-V fistula first strategy can be implemented with low morbidity in ESRD patients.

Mugda Med Coll J. 2025; 8(2): 118-124

Abstract
16
PDF
4

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Rayhan, M. F., Ahmed, L., Ahmed, M., Alam, R., Hossain, M. R., & Chowdhury, D. A. H. (2025). Outcome of Arterio-Venous Fistula With and Without Central Venous Catheter in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease. Mugda Medical College Journal, 8(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.3329/mumcj.v8i2.85801

Issue

Section

Original Article