Effects of value added tax zero-rated food products on households’ welfare in South Africa

Authors

  • B L Kwebulane Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, North-West University Mafikeng Campus, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa
  • A S Oyekale Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, North-West University Mafikeng Campus, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v11i3.78947

Keywords:

Value added tax, Zero-rating, South Africa, Poor households, Welfare

Abstract

Internationally, the use of Value Added Tax zero-rating to lessen the tax's regressivity is now widely acknowledged. From an economic point of view, it is still debatable if zero-rating is the most economical method of helping the poor. The 2018 1% VAT rate increase in the South African tax system has renewed focus on the need of zero-rating from the viewpoints of equality and poverty. This paper evaluated whether the existing list of commodity items with zero ratings improves welfare and whether or not more items should be taken into consideration for potential zero-rating. The Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit's National Income Dynamics Survey (2018) of South Africa was used in this study. The survey offered pertinent data on family spending on specific items by total spending and income level. The study's conclusions showed that a fair and just tax system required the VAT zero-rating of particular items as a logical and essential step. Most of the items with a zero rating are used by low-income households. However, there are a few exceptions to the rule for fruits and some vegetables. Also, the study commends individually quick-frozen (IQF) chicken portions for zero-rating.

Res. Agric. Livest. Fish. Vol. 11, No. 3, December 2024: 401-415

Downloads

Abstract
228
PDF
370

Downloads

Published

2025-01-07

How to Cite

B L Kwebulane, & A S Oyekale. (2025). Effects of value added tax zero-rated food products on households’ welfare in South Africa. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, 11(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v11i3.78947

Issue

Section

Agriculture