Study on Intercropping Carrot with Groundnut Under Different Row Arrangements

Authors

  • MRI Mondal Director General, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur
  • F Begum Senior Scientific Officer, Oilseed Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur
  • MM Alam Scientific Officer, Oilseed Research Centre, BARI, Gazipur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v37i2.11223

Keywords:

Intercropping, groundnut, carrot, yield and economic return

Abstract

Burirhat, Rangpur during two consecutive seasons of 2004-05 and 2005-06, respectively, to find out suitable row arrangement of carrot with groundnut for higher yield and economic return. There were six treatments, such as sole groundnut, sole carrot, one row of carrot in between two normal rows of  groundnut, two rows of carrot in between two normal rows of groundnut, two  rows of groundnut alternated with two rows of carrot and three rows of  groundnut alternated with three rows of carrot. Results showed that monoculture  produced the highest yields of individual crops but in intercropping system the  highest groundnut equivalent yield (10.63 t/h and 11.10 t/ha) was obtained from two rows of carrot in between two rows of groundnut. The maximum land  equivalent ratio (1.67 and 1.74), the highest gross return (Tk.212600/ha and  Tk. 248400/ha) and net return (Tk.184881/ha and Tk.211680) were also obtained from the intercropping treatment with two rows carrot in between two normal rows of groundnut. But due to higher cost in this treatment, maximum benefit cost ratio (7.09 and 7.01) was obtained from the intercropping treatment    with one row carrot in between two normal rows of groundnut in both the years.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v37i2.11223

Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 37(2): 215-223, June 2012

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
189
PDF
289

Downloads

Published

2012-07-14

How to Cite

Mondal, M., Begum, F., & Alam, M. (2012). Study on Intercropping Carrot with Groundnut Under Different Row Arrangements. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 37(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v37i2.11223

Issue

Section

Articles