Outcome of Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Long Segment Anterior Urethral Stricture

Authors

  • Mrinmoy Biswas Department of Urology, Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Sudip Das Gupta Department of Urology, Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mohammed Mizanur Rahman Department of Urology, NIKDU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Sharif Mohammad wasimuddin Department of Urology, Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bju.v19i2.49365

Keywords:

Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty, Uroflowmetry, PVR

Abstract

Objective: To assess the success of BMG urethroplasty in long segment anterior urethral stricture.

Method: From January 2014 to December 2015, twenty male patients with long anterior segment urethral stricture were managed by BMG urethroplasty. After voiding trial they were followed up at 3 month with Uroflowmetry, RGU & MCU and PVR measurement by USG. Patients were further followed up with Uroflowmetry and PVR at 6 months interval.Successful outcome was defined as normal voiding with a maximum flow rate >15ml /sec and PVR<50 ml with consideration of maximum one attempt of OIU after catheter removal.

Results: Mean stricture length was 5.2 cm (range 3-9 cm) and mean follow-up was 15.55 months (range 6-23 months). Only two patients developed stricture at proximal anastomotic site during follow-up. One of them voided normally after single attempt of OIU. Other one required second attempt of OIU and was considered as failure (5%).

Conclusion: BMG urethroplasty is a simple technique with good surgical outcome.

Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 19, No. 2, July 2016 p.64-68

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
19
PDF
27

Downloads

Published

2020-09-23

How to Cite

Biswas, M., Gupta, S. D., Rahman, M. M., & wasimuddin, S. M. (2020). Outcome of Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Long Segment Anterior Urethral Stricture. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, 19(2), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.3329/bju.v19i2.49365

Issue

Section

Original Articles