Psychological well-being and coping strategies of the forcefully displaced Rohingya refugees

Authors

  • Mehrin Mostafa Mumu Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
  • Md Reza A Rabby Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
  • Parveen Huque Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v32i2.67675

Keywords:

Refugee, Psychological well-being, Adaptive coping, Non-adaptive coping

Abstract

Despite the immensity and severity of the Rohingya refugee crisis, information on their psychological well-being and coping mechanisms are limited. This work aims to synthesize research on the mental health and coping strategies of Rohingya refugees. Forty-four purposely sampled refugees completed a cross-sectional survey in the form of a structured interview, providing demographic information as well as responses on the Bangla Psychological well-being measure and the Bangla coping scale. The mean score for respondents' psychological well-being was 246.9 (SD = 25.39), while the mean score for adaptive coping was 35.93 (SD = 4.64) and the mean score for nonadaptive coping was 26.29 (SD = 3.76). Results showed a statistically significant difference (t= -2.185, p<.05) in adaptive coping scores between single/unmarried and married participants. Awareness of past traumatic experiences needs to be harmonized with consideration of existing stressors and factors pertaining to future concerns. It is imperative to construct mental health interventions that mobilize the individual and community capabilities of Rohingya refugees.

Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 32(2): 159-166, 2023 (July)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
2
PDF
3

Downloads

Published

2023-07-20

How to Cite

Mumu, M. M. ., Rabby, M. R. A., & Huque, P. . (2023). Psychological well-being and coping strategies of the forcefully displaced Rohingya refugees. Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences, 32(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v32i2.67675

Issue

Section

Articles