Analysis of beef cattle marketing channels under transaction costs in rural Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/ijarit.v11i1.54465Keywords:
Beef cattle, Marketing channel choice, Multinomial logit model, Smallholder farmers, Transaction costAbstract
The study was designed to analyze beef cattle marketing channel choice under transaction costs. Multistage sampling technique was used to acquire primary data. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Multinomial Logit Model. The findings verified that most of the respondents (49%) were selling at the village markets, followed by farm gate and secondary market with 28% and 23%, respectively. The model results revealed that the probability of selling at farm gate and village market versus selling at secondary market increased with season sales, indicating level of market uncertainty. The results affirmed the probability of selling at village market versus selling at secondary market outlet increased with knowledge of buyer and decreased with trust in buyers. Other significant predictors were volume of beef cattle supplied, farmers' experience, and education level. Thus, policies aimed at improving the smallholder farmers’ access to cattle marketing channels should be informed by these factors.
Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. Tech. 11(1): 37-48, June 2021
Downloads
26
42
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Copyright on any research article is transferred in full to the International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology upon publication in the journal. The copyright transfer includes the right to reproduce and distribute the article in any form of reproduction (printing, electronic media or any other form).
- Articles in the International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.