Serological and pathological investigation of brucellosis in dairy cows of Mymensingh district, Bangladesh

Authors

  • SK Dey Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
  • MS Rahman Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
  • UK Rima Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
  • MZ Hossain Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
  • GA Chowdhury Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
  • M Pervin Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
  • MA Habib Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
  • MAHNA Khan Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v11i2.19124

Keywords:

Rose Bengal Plate test, Indirect ELISA, Brucellosis, Histopathology, Dairy cows

Abstract

Brucellosis is a widespread and economically important infectious disease of animals and humans caused by the members of the genus Brucella. The disease is manifested by abortion, birth of unthrifty calves and retained placentae in female animals. The correct and prompt diagnosis is important for controlling and eradicating the disease from animals. This experiment was carried out in the Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh to detect Brucella antibody in dairy cows using Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (i-ELISA) and histopathology. The study was carried out between the periods of January 2012 to September 2012. Placental tissue obtained from aborted cow and internal organs of aborted fetus were used in histopathological study. A total of 190 sera sample were collected with the history of reproductive disorders, like late abortion, retained placenta and anestrous from Veterinary Hospital, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU) and meat market Kewatkhali, Mymensingh. The seroprevalance of brucellosis using RBPT and iELISA were 2.63% and 1.05% respectively. Histopathological study revealed multifocal necrosis in hepatic parenchyma, depletion of lymphocytes in spleen and lymphnodes and distended trabeculi in spleen and lymphnodes in aborted calf, diffuse fibrosis around the placental epithelia and in placental tissues. Distinct histopathological lesions in the liver and spleen of Brucella suspected calf were not evident but the retained fetal membrane showed characteristics fibrosis and reactive cellular infiltration. It needs to adopt nucleic acid based technologies in order to confirm the species of Brucella involved and as well as to avoid cross reactivity of antibodies as seen in RBPT and iELISA.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v11i2.19124

Bangl. J. Vet. Med. (2013). 11 (2): 107-112

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
220
PDF
279

References

Al-Attas RA, Al-Khalifa M and Alqurashi AR (2000). Evaluation of PCR, culture and serology for the diagnosis of acute human brucellosis. Annual Saudi Medicine 20: 224 - 228.

Al-Majali AM (2005). Seroepidemiology of caprine brucellosis in Jordan. Small Ruminant Research 58: 13 18.

Amin KMR, Rahman MB, Sarkar SK, Kabir SML and Akand MSI (2004). Serological epidemiology of brucellosis in cattle of the Mymensingh district of Bangladesh. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 3: 898 - 900.

Bishop GC, Bosman PP and Herr S (1994). Bovine brucellosis. Infectious diseases of livestock with Special Reference to Southern Africa. Vol 2. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, 1053 - 1066.

CDC: Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). Laboratory-Acquired Brucellosis Indiana and Minnesota. Emergency Infectious Diseases 57: 39 - 42.

Corbel MJ, Stuart FA and Brewer RA (1983). Observations on serological cross-reactions between smooth Brucella species and organisms of other genera. 3th international Symposium on Brucelosis; in Develop Biology Standard 56: 341- 348.

FAO (2006). Progress in understanding brucellosis. Vet Record 641.

Franz DR, Jahrling PB and Friedlander AM (1997). Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. Journal of American Medical Association 278: 399 - 411.

Godfroid J, Bosman PP, Herr S and Bishop GC (2004). Bovine brucellosis. Infectious Disease of Livestock 3: 1510 - 1527.

Gul ST and Khan A (2007). Epidemiology and epizootology of brucellosis. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 27: 145 - 151.

Kadir (2010). Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in cattle in some of the selected areas of Naogaon District, M.S Thesis, Department of Medicine, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.

Nahar A and Ahmed MU (2009). Seroprevalence study of brucellosis in cattle and contact human in Mymensingh district. Bangladesh Veterinary Medicine 7: 269-274.

Navarro E, Casao MA and Solera J (2004). Diagnosis of human brucellosis using PCR single nucleotide polymorphisms for rapid identification of Brucella isolates at the species level. Applied Environmental Microbiology 73: 7331 - 7337.

Nicoletti P (1980). The epidemiology of bovine brucellosis. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine 24: 69 - 98.

Nielsen K, Kelly L, Gall D, Nicoletti P, and Kelly W (1995). Improved competitive enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 46: 285 291.

Nielsen K, Smith P, Widdison J, Gall D, Kelly L, Kelly W and Nicoletti P (2004). Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Veterinary Microbiology 100: 25 - 30.

Nielsen K, Smith PYW, Nicolett P, Jungersen G, Stac, J and Godfroid J (2006). Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O: 9 in cattle and pigs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 109: 69 78.

Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B and Carter GH (1994). Brucella species In: Clinical Veterinary Microbiology pp. 261-267.

Radostits OM, Blood DC and Hinchcliff KW (2000). Veterinary Medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, sheep, pigs, goats and horses. 9th edn. Saunders Co. Ltd., London, 877 - 889.

Rahman MS, Han JC, Park J, Lee JH, Eo SK and Chae JS (2011). Prevalence of brucellosis and its association with reproductive problems in cows in Bangladesh. Veterinary Record 159: 432445.

Rahman MS, Huque MF, Ahasan, MS, Song HJ (2010). Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle. Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 33: 113119.

Rahman AKMA, Saegerman C, Berkvens D, Fretin D, Gani MO, Ershaduzzaman M, Ahmed MU and Emmanuel A (2013). Bayesian estimation of true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of indirect ELISA, Rose Bengal Test and Slow Agglutination Test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in sheep and goats in Bangladesh. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 110: 242-252.

Refai MK (2003). Brucellosis in animals and man in Egypt. Egypt Journal of Veterinary Science 37: 1-31.

Shamim A, Alam N, Rahman MS, Rahman MA, Haque F and Hee-Jong S (2009). Korean Journal of Veterinary Service 32(3): 219-225.

Sidell FR, Takafuji ET and Franz DR (1997). Medical aspects of chemical and biological warfare. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General 42: 514521.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-11

Issue

Section

Ruminant Medicine