Nephron-Sparing Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for T1 Renal Mass: Seven Years’ Experience and Outcomes

Authors

  • Md. Waliul Islam Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka
  • Md. Fazal Naser Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka
  • Md. Abul Hossain Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka
  • Md. Muazzam Hossan Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka
  • BM Saiduzzaman Assistant Registrar, Department of Urology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka
  • Mominul Haider Registrar, Department of Urology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jcamr.v8i1.52747

Keywords:

Nephron-sparing surgery, renal cell carcinoma, Open partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Abstract

Background: Nephron-sparing surgery is an accepted treatment modality for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in certain situations.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for patients with a solitary renal tumors of 7cm or less in different institutes in Dhaka.

Methodology: Between June 2013 and October 2020, 23 patients had undergone LPN and 24 patients had undergone OPN for the treatment of solitary renal tumors of 7cm or less in different institutes in Dhaka. Large renal mass (>7cm), multiple tumor and patients with complex renal anatomy were excluded from this study. Patients having previous abdominal surgery were excluded from LPN and all LPN were performed transperitoneally.

Results: Although the mean operative time was longer in the LPN than in the OPN group (134.4±35.36 (45-180) minutes versus 110.56±35.36 (60-165) minutes; P<0.001), the blood loss was comparable between the two groups (130 mL versus 180 mL; P value is not statistically significant). No blood transfusions were performed in either group. The hospital stay was significantly reduced after LPN compared with after OPN (2.8 days (2-6) versus 6.7 days (5-8); P <0.0002). 2 patients in LPN and 1 patient in OPN had positive surgical margins.

Conclusion: This study has revealed that LPN is a feasible and safe alternative to the OPN with better surgical outcomes and similar oncological outcomes.

Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research, January 2021;8(1):70-74

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
19
PDF
30

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Islam, M. W., Naser, M. F., Hossain, M. A., Hossan, M. M., Saiduzzaman, B., & Haider, M. (2021). Nephron-Sparing Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for T1 Renal Mass: Seven Years’ Experience and Outcomes. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research, 8(1), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.3329/jcamr.v8i1.52747

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright on any research article in the Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research is retained by the author(s).

The authors grant the Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.

Articles in the Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and it is not used for commercial purposes.