Effective manuscript revision responses: Best practices for turning feedback into publication success
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i3.84659Keywords:
peer review, author response, dealing with editors, dealing with reviewersAbstract
Not applicable
Downloads
0
0 PDF
0
References
Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-243. PMID: 27683470
Drozdz JA, Ladomery MR. The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future. Br J Biomed Sci. 2024 Jun 17;81:12054. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12054
Elsevier. Reviewer Hub, 2024. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/introducing-reviewer-hub [Accessed on 29 September 2025]
SAGE Publishing. Reviewer benefits, 2022. Available from: https://www.sagepub.com/journals/information-for-reviewers/reviewer-benefits [Accessed on 29 September 2025]
BMJ Open. Instructions for reviewers, 2025. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/pages/reviewer-guidelines [Accessed on 29 September 2025]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M Mostafa Zaman, Tanvir C Turin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.