Effective manuscript revision responses: Best practices for turning feedback into publication success

Authors

  • M Mostafa Zaman Department of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-1342
  • Tanvir C Turin Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i3.84659

Keywords:

peer review, author response, dealing with editors, dealing with reviewers

Abstract

Not applicable

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
0
Article text
0 PDF
0

References

Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-243. PMID: 27683470

Drozdz JA, Ladomery MR. The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future. Br J Biomed Sci. 2024 Jun 17;81:12054. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12054

Elsevier. Reviewer Hub, 2024. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/introducing-reviewer-hub [Accessed on 29 September 2025]

SAGE Publishing. Reviewer benefits, 2022. Available from: https://www.sagepub.com/journals/information-for-reviewers/reviewer-benefits [Accessed on 29 September 2025]

BMJ Open. Instructions for reviewers, 2025. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/pages/reviewer-guidelines [Accessed on 29 September 2025]

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

M Mostafa Zaman, & Turin, T. C. (2025). Effective manuscript revision responses: Best practices for turning feedback into publication success. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 18(3), e84659. https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i3.84659

Issue

Section

Editorial

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.